Male-dominated vocabulary, and wondering if "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" is part of that?
Ooookaaay, so I might be looking too deeply into this. But I recently learned that language is a literally man-made construct, something controlled by dominant groups, according to Muted Group Theory, and one example is that our lexicon is more appropriated towards men than women, and this goes for people in minority groups as well. Stuff like "leveling the playing field" is male-oriented because sports are stereotypically a male interest. I heard someone say "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," and under this new lens, I was thinking it sounded a little masculine for some reason. Would this be an example of the male-dominated lexicon? Or are my perceptions of it overcompensating a bit for confirmation bias?
Since it's not clear, I'm talking about the construction of the phrase, not the implication that men fix everything. Same with the sports metaphor, that was something my book gave an example of. I am not claiming women are not into sports. I of course do not believe either of these things, and I'm sorry that my wording was so confusing about that.
EDIT: Okay, I think I need to address some things. When I say "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," I am not thinking of women not being able to fix things. That's crazy that people are assuming that from my wording. I was speaking from a point of view that the way it's constructed feels masculine for some reason. Evidently I'm looking too much into this.
And this is all stuff I just learned about. It was a concept called Muted Group Theory, with the proposition being that language is defined and practiced under the control of the dominant group. One instance is how few words are used as slurs against me versus how many words are used as slurs against women. The Muted Group Theory is talking about how marginalized groups don't have as much say in the lexicon, even positing that most words in the dictionary are made by men, with words made by women being dismissed (I can't find evidence of this, so I'm skeptical).
They're approaching it as, women need to adjust their speech around men vs around women. It has a few testimonies from women that are high-ranking in their companies, and one talks about how she had to lower her voice and use sports metaphors in order to connect with her male counterparts. This goes for minority groups, as well. They can't speak their own ideas in their own way and language. They have to engage in code-switching to be heard, or else they are ignored or dismissed.
That's what it was about. That's all I was asking about.