
What is this 2025 ‘Til Tuesday album?
It’s just a few instrumental songs.
This link only shows one song, but if you search around you can find three more. One is Now Or Never.

It’s just a few instrumental songs.
This link only shows one song, but if you search around you can find three more. One is Now Or Never.
I saw it at Wal-Mart today. It seemed to just be some art with a light under it - no cutouts or 3D depth look.
I saw it at Wal-Mart today. It seemed to just be some art with a light under it - no cutouts or 3D depth look.
I have the bottom two and can vouch 100% for their quality. Here’s all of them.
At one point near the beginning, Q has you look into a device and tells you it will take some time for your lenses to be created (edit: calibrated). I wasn’t quite sure what he was talking about and just moved on.
When you first start using the watch and a Q-Lens HUD came up on the screen, I was so used to so many other games hand waving how you could see a HUD that I didn't give it a second thought.
Then I realized that what Q was doing was developing contact lenses that allowed Bond to see the watch HUD.
Was I the only one that didn’t connect these things?
My wife just pointed out that something I’ve always done may be related to my ADHD. (I’m in my late 50s and was officially diagnosed about 12 years ago).
I can’t read one book at a time. On the table next to my chair, I usually have a stack of 5-6 books and at least one magazine, all different subjects. I read like 20 pages out of one, and then I get bored and have to switch to another book. Then around 20 pages from that book, on and on. When I go on trips I bring multiple books with me. I tried just using a Kindle but I like the different feeling of the books and magazines, almost like a fidget.
Is that an ADHD thing or is it just a personal quirk of mine?
I’ve got 2,000 combined in both games and have zero interest in this.
It just doesn’t look much like a Horizon game to me. I’m also not interested in a live service game.
No hate towards anyone who is excited about this, I just don’t get it.
Concerning the scene where K is running through the DNA records of the child, couldn't K just compare his DNA to the child’s DNA? That would tell him instantly if he was the child.
According to the canonical description of Ana’s backstory, Deckard and the replicant freedom group “scrambled the birth records, making it seem that the pregnancy produced twins, a boy and a girl with identical DNA, and that the girl died young.” This would lead me to believe that the DNA is correct, just the metadata is mixed up.
That means the DNA in the archive is real, the girl’s DNA appears twice, one entry is labeled male, one entry is labeled female, and the the female entry is marked as deceased.
Because the DNA itself was real, K could have compared it to his own, checked the sex markers, run a familial match and reconstructed a phenotype (in a world that advanced), and gotten a rough idea of what the child looked like. Right?
He would have immediately learned the child was female, the DNA didn’t match his, and the ‘boy’ record was a decoy.
I only caught this during my fifth or sixth watch. Am I missing something?
This is the best description I’ve seen of the developer’s mindsets when they started designing BioShock Infinite, and why they made some of the changes they did. From Game Informer, Issue 210, October 2010.