u/Cosmo-kawaii

We are Fandom forged or mirroring music, finding hidden games within games, counting toes, searching game code and reading a plethora of non-canon books.

The argument about the fnaf 1 date is just a biased as that of the unwithereds vs. Classics, people are too set in their ways. We all believe that fnaf 1 takes place in 1993 because matpat used wage measuring, all while we have the only CANON book suggesting that Ralph (who worked before mike) was working at Freddy's in 1989. In honesty it is sad to see that we cannot look to change our opinions when new evidence appears, choosing to disregard it as non-canon, an easter egg or simply because some sprites dont match.

That being said, id like to support my claim as to why fnaf 1 takes place in 1989:

- in the week before ralph commonly references films made in 1988, something that most likely would've been out of fashion by 1993.

- our main evidence for 1993 can only be found by taking sources from outside the fnaf universe.

- Fnaf 2 opens 2 years after the supposed closure of the 1983 location, assuming fnaf 1 opens in 1989 this continues the trend of being able to renovate and open a pizzeria within 2 years.

This is only a minute amount of evidence supporting my claim

All in all, we CANNOT simply dismiss evidence just because it is not directly called evidence.

EDIT: I mean to state that fnaf 1 location had to of opened in 1989, I am open to believe that fnaf 1 takes place later, assuming TWB is Ralph's last week, still doesnt explain why he'd be referencing 1988 films in 1993 though.

bascially the after credit scene,

I really want them to have a newspaper flyby that says fazbear opens new pizzeria, then i want to see some development of FFPP (fnaf 6). itd be even better if lefty was used to capture the puppet in the fnaf 3 movie.

Now ive always been interested in williams family relation, I never through he truly cared for them but I did belive that the emmense loss of control following each of their deaths brought him to finally comit more retched acts.

So what do we thing about Willtwistedcare does it hold up as a somewhat credible theory, or has it become a theory that is just horrid as Willcare?

We all know that history in fazbear ent. tends to repeat.

Under 2 primary ideas, golden freddy caused the bite of 87, and William set up the toys to kill someone (personally i believe that he intend for them to kill a child, and his programming failed hence why they are only aggresive to adults) on that fateful day.

William afton continues his research on the distance of possession, remant, memorant during the DCI, in an aims to recreate Charlie's death. A few days later continuing his efforts to put his son back together, he aims for a child to be put into the mouth of 'fredbear' with 4 bullies wearing animtronic masks (only this time they arent mask - they are the real thing). This would recreate the same circumstances his son went though. Unfortunately his plan does not go through, the animtronics ( possibly due to the MCI or DCI's possesion/semi-possesion of the toys) instead kill an innocent day guard, locking him in the jaws of fredbear.

How it happened is only speculative but the idea of 4 bullies, I.e animatronics putting someone in the mouth of fredbear in an aims to "fix" CC is very possible.

Thank you!