What Fallacy is this?
Basically? The responder focuses mostly on the outcome to downplay the claim.
Claimant: I think Steven may have had an advantage in the contest because he was allowed to see the criteria in advance.
Responder: But he only took third place.
~ ~ ~
Claimant: That was a risky turn you took. You shouldn't do that again, you could have gotten hurt if someone kept running.
Responder: But we made it.
~ ~ ~
Claimant: You scared me!
Responder: I was trying to get your attention.
Claimant: By shouting at me?
Responder: Well it worked, didn't it?
The Responder is not responding directly to the Claimant, who is criticising methods.