A smart ISTJ is capable of using Ti when needed as well as Te, they just don't prefer it over Te. And they are slight more adaptable and can acutally utilize their inferior Ne when necessary (when they realize they need some Ne brainstorming or other things). But I might be wrong. A ISTJ doesn't naturally live in the Ne space, instead they live in the Si space. But when Si doesn't work I think a smart one can shift to using their infeiror Ne. A smart ISTJ is more balanced. They are great with incremental change/innovation to existing systems. ISTJ may still be able to use Ne, not their first inclinnation.

A dumb one on the other hand have less ability to use their inferior Ne "properly" and their Te + Ti may be underdevloped, and they would often not be logical. They are also more rigid in their appraoch and lack the ability to shift.

But I might be wrong, this is waht I think.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

So I was trying to fill out an alignment chart for best books and now I'm focusing on myster as the main genre. I already have Annihilation under Main genre Sci Fi subgnre mystery, and the Name of the Rose (main genre Historical Fiction subgenre Mystery). But I need some recommendations of what would be the best book for the genre blends listed below.

• Main Genre: Mystery, Subgenre: Sci Fi
• Main Genre: Mystery, Subgenre: Horror
• Main Genre: Mystery, Subgenre: Historical Fiction
• Main Genre: Mystery, Subgenre: Adventure (not Annihilation by Jeff Vandermeer, I already have that in another slot)
• Main Genre: Mystery, Subgenre: Romance
• Main Genre: Mystery, Subgenre: Thriller
• Main Genre: Mystery, Subgenre: Literary Fiction

No Spoiliers for any of the books please

So I tried to read The Deluge, but so far it hasn't yet appeled to me. I didn't finish the book. Same thing with The Handmaids Tale (some people say that's a classic but it didn't really appeal to me).

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

I mean a book that had thriller as the main genre over fantasy and fantasy a subgenre

So I was trying to fill out my alignment chart for best books of each genre, and I'm looking for recommendations for historical fictoin romance books. What do you think? I mean their's books where the main plot is romance but it's also historical fiction.

So I was trying to fill out my alignment chart for best books of each genre, and I'm looking for recommendations for historical fictoin romance books. What do you think? I mean their's books where the main plot is romance but it's also historical fiction.

So I'm looking at horror books where the main plot is romance but their is some horror element. A book that is mainly a romance.

To me I was thinking that Si doms are most distrubed by anbydoy that attempts to flip the table. Si/Te (with Ti support) prefers to rely on what has been proven to work. They see the world as it is (the alliances, treaites, etc) and analyze it using Te or Ti. To me they prefer to maintain the wya things are if they're working. That means maintaining relationships with allies, upholding established protocols, and honoring the unspoken social and structural contracts that keep chaos at bay. Because Si perceives the world through a deeply etched matrix of historical data, lived experience, and proven precedents, it treats stability not as a passive state, but as an active, hard-won achievement. When an individual or an external force attempts to abruptly 'flip the table,' the Si dom doesn't just see a change in strategy—they see a reckless disregard for the foundational pillars that prevent systemic collapse.

In this case a Si dom may end up in a infeiror Ne grip (I think), they just can't stop thinking of negative scnearios. I assume a weaness of a ISTJ is adapting to black swan events, they could be very good in foreign policy as long as everything is predictable, logical, structured, and doesn't devaite from the staus quo too much. Whenever someone comes in and doesn't play by the expected rules, Si doms end up feeling uncomfortable. To me Si dom's biggest weakness is when the they can no longer rely on "the way things are" or the rulebook.

High Introverted Sensing (Si) users comprise a significant portion of the college-educated, white-collar workforce—including doctors, lawyers, accountants, and nurses. The lazy stereotype that all "Sensors" automatically favor radical anti-establishment movements misinterprets their core cognitive wiring.

While Extraverted Intuitives (Ne dominants) can comfortably entertain the theoretical possibilities of a systemic shake-up (not saying they neceeasiry approve of it), Si dominants often view anything chaotic, rule-breaking things as a destructive force smashing the very structures that ensure society functions. Because their inferior $Ne$ manifests primarily as a focus on worst-case scenarios, they perceive the disruption of established norms not as an exciting evolution, but as a direct path to systemic collapse. Consequently, rather than seeing potential for renewal disruption, their anxiety triggers catastrophic projections of societal breakdown and institutional ruin. When faced with a leader or an environment that completely disregards rules, skips established protocols, and acts unpredictably, the $ISTJ$ can be pushed into a state of high stress. This triggers an inferior Ne grip, where their dominant logic is overwhelmed. Instead of generating constructive solutions, their mind acts as a radar solely for negative possibilities, spiraling into catastrophic projections where they can only see all the catastrophic ways the situation could go wrong.

An ISTJ does not blindly stick to a broken system forever. When their dominant Si gathers enough historical data to realize that an existing framework is no longer functioning efficiently, they can consciously tap into their inferior Ne.

• They use it to foresee potential risks.
• They apply it to design carefully calculated, incremental changes.
• The goal is always to update the system "by the book" to ensure continuous operational stability, rather than tearing it down.

PS I might be wrong, so feel free to correct me with your own expeirneces. I'm might be right or I might be wrong. But the summary of this is that ISTJ's prefer stability and incremtnal change and dislikes radical change or anything that creates chaos or problems in existing systmes or disregarding the way things are or rules. ALso don't refer to any specific political figure either.

SCENE START

SETTING: A sun-drenched beach. The air is thick with salt and the roar of the surf.

CHARACTERS:

• SEAN (Se): Focused, kinetic, grounded in the immediate physical environment.
• NED (Ne): Distracted, imaginative, constantly synthesizing abstract connections.
• SID (Si): Methodical, relies on past experience and patterns.
• NIA (Ni): Visionary, detached, focused on the unfolding trajectory of the future.

(SEAN is crouching near the water’s edge, letting the wet sand ooze between his toes. NED is standing nearby, staring at the horizon. SID is pacing, observing the rhythm of the tide.)

SEAN: (Points to the shoreline) Look at that. The tide’s pulling back way too far. It’s barely whispering against the rocks now—usually, it’s hitting that driftwood stump by this time of day.

NED: You know, that receding water reminds me of a giant inhaling before a scream. It’s like the ocean is playing a game of cosmic hide-and-seek. If we added a few degrees of lunar gravity, or maybe subtracted the friction of the continental shelf, could the ocean just... detach? Like a liquid gear slipping out of place? Everything is connected to the spin of the planet, really. Just like a marble rolling in a bowl.

SID: (His expression tightens, eyes scanning the horizon with a grim precision) It’s not a game, Ned. I’ve seen the records, the accounts from ’04 and the older journals. That specific recession—the way the seabed is exposed like an open wound—is a precursor. The global pattern of a displacement wave. It’s happening.

SEAN: (Standing up abruptly, his eyes scanning the horizon intensely) I don’t see any wall of water yet, Sid. Just a lot of wet sand and crabs scurrying for cover. But you’re right, the air feels… heavy. The birds have gone dead silent.

NED: (Oblivious, tracing patterns in the air) What if the crabs are actually communicating a frequency we can’t hear? It’s like a telegraph system. Or maybe the ocean is just resetting its memory? If we tweak the variables—

SID: (Shouting) It’s a tsunami! Move! Now!

(A low, guttural roar begins to vibrate the sand under their feet. SEAN looks up, his pupils dilating as he catches the first glimpse of a dark, jagged line on the horizon.)

SEAN: (Acting instantly) That’s not a tide. That’s a monster. Ned, move!

(SEAN grabs NED by the collar, dragging him toward the dunes. NED stumbles, still blinking in confusion.)

NED: Whoa, wait! Is it a simulation? The ripple effect implies—

SEAN: (Hard, urgent) Stop thinking! Run!

(CUT TO: A high-rise rooftop overlooking the coast. NIA stands perfectly still, hands resting on the railing. She is watching the distant, inevitable destruction with a calm, focused intensity. She has been there for an hour, a small, packed bag at her feet.)

NIA: (To herself, voice quiet but certain) The convergence point was absolute. The seismic data matched the precursor cycles perfectly. It wasn't a possibility; it was a destination.

(She watches the wave crest, her face unmoving as she adjusts her footing, already looking toward the path of safety she had mapped out long before the others even stepped onto the sand.)

SCENE END

Feel free to comment if you'd like, any comment is infe.