As the title says, and it would be pleasurable if you answer this with a link or direction

I am curious about y'all as community so I'll ask some few questions.

1. What do you think of Made in Abyss? Besides it's great story, how about the arts about the characters, and stuff.

2. Have any of you heard of BigGaming64? If so, do you like him, or nah, or even do you hate him?

3. What some of you played blood, flesh & concrete, and did you consider it to be very good, or bad?

4. Would you rather watch pure phycological torture porn for straight hours and half with no breaks at all, or interact with an anti-proship person (which is a stranger that you have zero knowledge on, and vice versa for the stranger)

5. What actually qualify as proship? Like is it just shipping ships that's problematic, or In a problematic way?

6. Would you like to see a cruel character idea I have, or nah?

Bleaching — in linguistics — is the loss or removal of part of the (semantic, grammatical, etc) content or a word or morpheme [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bleaching\].

First, I am criticizing certain types of people who do this, not all of you don't this, nor does all men, women, and non-binary.

Anyways, in TikTok, or in this place, I kinda think that people starting to misunderstand what misogyny, or misandry is meant to be; I understand they meant it like "discrimination based on [certain gender]" but misogyny, and misandry is just hatred against certain gender so if you hate someone because they are that gender isn't exactly discriminative, because it doesn't specify if it's all, or one person.

Also some of you are starting to use it like a slur, like something that isn't desirable to be called as such which is not a good idea because that's means people will hide their sexism, which maybe sounds great but the sexism would become subtle, which would make it harder to notice it.

This brings me to another point, the "there's a man" trend is kinda either pointing out seemingly obviously misogyny which is the main focus, but oftentimes, they literally pointing out obviously misogyny, or something linguistics like "mermaid" and "merman" even tho maid isn't mean like that, and mermaid etymologically means "maid of the sea".

Okay, I will say that I am not saying that misogyny doesn't exist, but I am also not saying that misandry doesn't exist, both clearly exist; the trauma that comes from both aren't exactly equal but they are still valid traumas, so I will say that I am not trying to invalidate someone's trauma.

Like in a philosophical sense, but in a survival sense.

What ideology or philosophy makes you survive, live, or thrive in life? Pretty sure it's all of them, and not of them at the same time I guess.

Another thing, is the main difference between Surviving, Living, and Thriving could be comfortablity? Am I wrong, or are there any other interpretations?

I have two OCs in a place called Anyplace and I want some feedback to what you think about the character

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DzsFQ6iMWfJEw90nlacsd\_4FeLzJZBokTz4IL67OxrY/edit?usp=drivesdk

I have a theological magic system named "Denir" which is about constructing, and/or creating vows with deities which is I first made the construction of a deity.

The process of constructing a deity is a two large steps, which are the first step is to establish the Essential Form: which is the deity's most basic framework like what concept do they control, contains, or embodies.

How to do establish an essential form is by either Apotheosization (simply just claiming something as a deity), Theocrasization (merging two or more deities to create one or more deity, or confusing a deity for being another deity), Theogonization (create a theographic literature, similar to the holy books, or mythos of multiple mythology), Theomorphization / Idolization (by claiming that an idol, or something physical is a deity and the rest came from cultural symbolism from the idol), and/or Theonymization (naming a deity).

The next step after establishing the essential form is to create the canonized form, which isn't exactly essential but is essential for creating an actualized and averagely powerful deity.

How to make a Canonized Form of a deity is mostly make the deity famous, at least be known or preferably believed by hundreds or thousands, and they are basically have a Canonized Form.

The benefits of Canonized Form is that you can actually form a vow to the deity, in which you become a priest [will explained later], but the byproduct is that the deity will have agency, personality, behaviors, mannerisms, ideologies, philosophy, or more which can sometimes work against you, the Constructor

Constructorhood / Proto-priesthood

As you create a deity, you become a constructor or also known as a proto-priest, as you are technically the first devotee of your constructed deity, which has the potential of being the priest of said deity, but how you become an official priest is by creating a vow with the deity.

Also you could get power from the vow with the deity which would be explained later

Official Priesthood

To become a priest of a deity or of your own constructed priest, you will need to create a vow between you and the deity of choice. Your priesthood can become obsolete if the deity desire so, or if you break your vow

Vows

Vows are often a list of promises that you make between you and the deity of you chosing. Vows can also include conditions (or also called commandments), trades, and/or other stuff.

There are punishments for breaking a vow, in which you are mercy to whoever you broken over.

Warlockry: to be a warlock or oathbreaker, you will be punished to what ever the deity desires to do to you

Divine Disgrace: a deity who breaks their vow are called divine disgracer or oathbreaker, and they will be punished to what ever the priest desire to do to the deity

As in the swedish store? That's in real life, not SCP-3008.

Also another thing: do y'all like the SCP foundation for LGTBQIA representation, or something else entirely

Is there a language that is possible for being purely idiographic/ideographic language, without phonetics?

​

It would be a conceptual idea but again sign language exists so yes there's such a thing, but a further question is a conlang that exists without phonetics in the beginning

What I mean that philosophy (like nihilism, absurdism, and etc), religion (like Christianity, Buddhism, and etc), and queer identity (like gay, lesbian, and etc) are something that should be debated like a professional (nor business like, but in a well-mannered, or proper, or just none barbarian) philosophical debates about philosophy.

​

Like to argue properly you need like reasonable evidence or assumption about someone's identity; and ask question or criticize about what you want to argue about the person's identity.

​

I do understand why the LGTBQIA+ community don't like questioning or challenging someone's identity within their community, because it was, and still used to "fix" them which is a stupid idea, and generally a hypothetical and bigoted idea, which is very common in bigotry

"I love you like a daughter.

I love you like a son.

I love you like a father.

I love you like a mother.

I love you like a parent.

I love you like a friend.

I love you like a stranger

Oh how much I love you, you beast, you mermaid, you siren, you wretch thing but I love you like a partner.

I love you like a consort

I love you like a spouse.

I love you like a business.

I love you like an angel.

I love you like a devil.

I love you like God.

My love, you are so... you dryad, you relative of Kuchisake-onna, my love you are so lovely like a carrion flower, but again I still love, like a psychopath.

I love you like a sociopath.

I love you like a racist.

I love you like a slur.

I love you like a corpse.

I love you like a ableist.

I love you like a paraphile.

Oh do you know how much exception that makes, I love you even if your my target of my hatred, you abnormal and atypical goods. I love you so strangely, I love you, you alien, I will love you romantically, sexually, romantically, queerplatonically and unusually"

I am bored

And I am annoyed by the misandry and heterophobia situation where they are being you know, denying the existence of misandry and heterophobia.

It's a term, while fictional terms exist, these are not fictional terms, they are terms in English, misandry is hate towards man, heterophobia is fear of or aversion/resentment toward heterosexuals, or at least that's one of the definition.

I know about the argument of the difference between their counterpart (homophobia and misogyny), as they are systemic and global, but again, hatred is still bad and discrimination is even worse.

I am not denying, women are killed everyday or any days of the year and gays are harmed or hurt because they are gay, and women are abused or tortured by men like rape, SA or sexual harassment or murder or catcalling, and gays are also get killed or even illegal in some countries, but again, generalization and immediately assumption is bad right?

Then why generalize and immediately assume men are misogynist and straights are homophobic, or they do the same like all the others.

Also isn't that the same excuse used by racists? Generalizing black or asian people?

I am not talking about all of the misandrist or heterophobic — and by extent, not all women, men, queer people or straight, I am talking to and about the people who deny the existence of the concept such as misogyny and heterophobia.

Hello I am new to this subreddit and I have a conlang that doesn't have a constructed phonetics, nor does it have any phonetics in that manner, and I am using Orangia as the placeholder name

I currently have 16 glyphs (which I use to refer to letters) which are separated into two sections, variable and non-variable glyphs

Here's the alphabet with the 16 glyphs

Alphabet

Sections

A word (or ↑→) have three sections, left sect., middle sect. and right sect.

In a regular situation, the left sect. is fully replaced with middle sect., but unless it's a given or personal name or is the starting ↑→⋮⋯ of a sentence, in which the beginning glyph will be switched to left sect.

Right sect. is always replaces the last 5–2 glyph of a ↑→⋮⋯ or doesn't replace if the ↑→⋮⋯ is lower than three glyphs. Any ↑→⋮⋯ that is longer than five glyphs — which has two right sect glyphs — will have more right sect. glyph per glyphs; six glyphs have three right sect glyphs, seven glyphs have four right sect glyphs, and eight glyphs have five right sect glyphs, but anything more then no more will be added

Exception: if the ↑→⋮⋯ is standalone or isn't meant to connect with any other ↑→⋮⋯, then all of the glyphs will become middle sect.

Left Sect.

⇐

⇖

⇑

⇗

⇒

⇘

⇓

⇙

≎

≋

Middle Sect.

←

↖

↑

↗

→

↘

↓

↙

≏

≈

Right Sect.

⋯

⟍

|

⟋

—

⋱

⋮

⋰

≍

~

None Variable Sect.

These are Section for glyph that have no variation except itself

↻

↺

↷

↶

⊶

⊷

As the flower blooms around me, as I run around with fear and carelessness in antinomy, when the fleshy greens touches my leg, I hear the dits and dahs, and I lay down in the greens and reds. I sleep

"As I chosen a lifespan of any degree, I chose the lifespan that is adjusted to a large dog, maybe 12–16 years to live its life... I don't exactly remember the lifespan of a dog"

I have a poem that is named "A Drop of Blood" and the reason why I think it would be controversial is because of the beginning

Here's the poem

"I do wonder how it feels to punch someone's skin. How it feels to cut or scape their skin to see their flesh or blood. How it feels to kill someone with my bare fist or with an object. And how it feels to move around the organs. To bloodlet, or to lacerate, or to desecrate... am I violent?... I'm not exactly angry or enraged, actually, I think I would be calm yet breathing hard... I'm also not malicious or malevolent, I don't want to harm but I'm not exactly benevolent either... I'm not grief-stricken either, I haven't lost any loved ones yet... I'm not twisted enough to view it as love or nurturing... I'm not emotionless, I think I am... curious!"

I do have to clarify that I don't encourage such behaviors or even support it, and also do not say remove the graphics description of violence because it's the whole point of the poem, violence is bloody and curiosity based violence is in its extreme or unchecked, will be graphic