u/DqkmTwks

"I love you like a daughter.

I love you like a son.

I love you like a father.

I love you like a mother.

I love you like a parent.

I love you like a friend.

I love you like a stranger

Oh how much I love you, you beast, you mermaid, you siren, you wretch thing but I love you like a partner.

I love you like a consort

I love you like a spouse.

I love you like a business.

I love you like an angel.

I love you like a devil.

I love you like God.

My love, you are so... you dryad, you relative of Kuchisake-onna, my love you are so lovely like a carrion flower, but again I still love, like a psychopath.

I love you like a sociopath.

I love you like a racist.

I love you like a slur.

I love you like a corpse.

I love you like a ableist.

I love you like a paraphile.

Oh do you know how much exception that makes, I love you even if your my target of my hatred, you abnormal and atypical goods. I love you so strangely, I love you, you alien, I will love you romantically, sexually, romantically, queerplatonically and unusually"

I am bored

And I am annoyed by the misandry and heterophobia situation where they are being you know, denying the existence of misandry and heterophobia.

It's a term, while fictional terms exist, these are not fictional terms, they are terms in English, misandry is hate towards man, heterophobia is fear of or aversion/resentment toward heterosexuals, or at least that's one of the definition.

I know about the argument of the difference between their counterpart (homophobia and misogyny), as they are systemic and global, but again, hatred is still bad and discrimination is even worse.

I am not denying, women are killed everyday or any days of the year and gays are harmed or hurt because they are gay, and women are abused or tortured by men like rape, SA or sexual harassment or murder or catcalling, and gays are also get killed or even illegal in some countries, but again, generalization and immediately assumption is bad right?

Then why generalize and immediately assume men are misogynist and straights are homophobic, or they do the same like all the others.

Also isn't that the same excuse used by racists? Generalizing black or asian people?

I am not talking about all of the misandrist or heterophobic — and by extent, not all women, men, queer people or straight, I am talking to and about the people who deny the existence of the concept such as misogyny and heterophobia.

Hello I am new to this subreddit and I have a conlang that doesn't have a constructed phonetics, nor does it have any phonetics in that manner, and I am using Orangia as the placeholder name

I currently have 16 glyphs (which I use to refer to letters) which are separated into two sections, variable and non-variable glyphs

Here's the alphabet with the 16 glyphs

Alphabet

Sections

A word (or ↑→) have three sections, left sect., middle sect. and right sect.

In a regular situation, the left sect. is fully replaced with middle sect., but unless it's a given or personal name or is the starting ↑→⋮⋯ of a sentence, in which the beginning glyph will be switched to left sect.

Right sect. is always replaces the last 5–2 glyph of a ↑→⋮⋯ or doesn't replace if the ↑→⋮⋯ is lower than three glyphs. Any ↑→⋮⋯ that is longer than five glyphs — which has two right sect glyphs — will have more right sect. glyph per glyphs; six glyphs have three right sect glyphs, seven glyphs have four right sect glyphs, and eight glyphs have five right sect glyphs, but anything more then no more will be added

Exception: if the ↑→⋮⋯ is standalone or isn't meant to connect with any other ↑→⋮⋯, then all of the glyphs will become middle sect.

Left Sect.

⇐

⇖

⇑

⇗

⇒

⇘

⇓

⇙

≎

≋

Middle Sect.

←

↖

↑

↗

→

↘

↓

↙

≏

≈

Right Sect.

⋯

⟍

|

⟋

—

⋱

⋮

⋰

≍

~

None Variable Sect.

These are Section for glyph that have no variation except itself

↻

↺

↷

↶

⊶

⊷

As the flower blooms around me, as I run around with fear and carelessness in antinomy, when the fleshy greens touches my leg, I hear the dits and dahs, and I lay down in the greens and reds. I sleep

"As I chosen a lifespan of any degree, I chose the lifespan that is adjusted to a large dog, maybe 12–16 years to live its life... I don't exactly remember the lifespan of a dog"

I have a poem that is named "A Drop of Blood" and the reason why I think it would be controversial is because of the beginning

Here's the poem

"I do wonder how it feels to punch someone's skin. How it feels to cut or scape their skin to see their flesh or blood. How it feels to kill someone with my bare fist or with an object. And how it feels to move around the organs. To bloodlet, or to lacerate, or to desecrate... am I violent?... I'm not exactly angry or enraged, actually, I think I would be calm yet breathing hard... I'm also not malicious or malevolent, I don't want to harm but I'm not exactly benevolent either... I'm not grief-stricken either, I haven't lost any loved ones yet... I'm not twisted enough to view it as love or nurturing... I'm not emotionless, I think I am... curious!"

I do have to clarify that I don't encourage such behaviors or even support it, and also do not say remove the graphics description of violence because it's the whole point of the poem, violence is bloody and curiosity based violence is in its extreme or unchecked, will be graphic