u/Dry-Peanut-2479

What the heck is this about?
Is this another thing on the whole there goes your talent thing?

Why animals?
I am genuinely confused, what are they depicting themselves taking parts off of animals, that most of them need those parts to survive.
Like a tiger needs their stripes to help hide them in their environment.
A pangolin needs their armour, cause it’s the main way they protect themselves from predators.

Honestly, if this is about that stupid meme, this person is taking it too far.
Animal cruelty real or fake isn’t cool.

What are your thoughts?

Edit: I forgot to mention that this were taken from multiple posts all by OOP, I just thought it be better to combine that into one post rather than multiple.

This is one of the worst comparisons I’ve seen, so they’re comparing horses getting replaced with cars to ai, what?

Are they gonna compare how planes replaced boats for travelling across the ocean next?

I have a friend who has horses and they explained that it’s a lot of work to take care of a horse. So it makes sense that cars replaced them, even then where I live horses are still used for entertainment rides, and stuff like that.

I genuinely don’t understand why they think it’s quantity over quality when it comes to art.
What are your thoughts?

The furry is very unnecessary, but they just used the google au overview for the definition.

Why? It takes like an extra 5 seconds to scroll down to find the dictionary definition.
Also word definitions change depending on how they’re used.

What are your thoughts?

I’m pretty confused on what this is trying to convey, or be a discussion about.
OOP had it tagged as a discussion post, but I am failing to understand what it is a discussion about.

What are your thoughts?

Both of these drawings are of one of my favourite characters spawn.
I think both drawings look great.

What do you think?

I really tried for a solid 10 minutes to try and understand how this represents antis breaking subreddit rules, I felt like a was having a stroke the entire time.

But even then, I don’t think they can say anything, when they have been documented breaking subreddit rules.

What are your thoughts?

Seriously, why are you poking at the warhammer 40K community again. There is so much wrong with this, and man I didn’t wanna go on a rant today, but here we go.

1. Those are the admechs, not tau. Tau are the blue space communist. And the Admechs are heavily against ai, in lore they see it as the highest form of tech heresy.
2. They don’t worship gork, and Mork.
3. Those are demons of slaansh, and i am not gonna go into detail about them for lore reasons, but they are far from demons of nurgle.

Edit: she seems to be arguing in the comments of her post with incorrect warhammer lore. Please GW copyright strike witty it would be funny.

Thank you for reading my rant.
What are your thoughts?

I haven’t heard of a time when antis invaded pro ai spaces.
But I have heard many, many times when pro ai invaded anti ai spaces, you can’t get mad at us for doing something, then turning around and doing the exact same thing. Thats not how things work.

Let’s not forget that you ai bros entered cara (an anti ai space) and then scrapped the entire website.

What are your thoughts?

Mine are called the punishers, and they’re a loyalist successor chapter of the iron warriors. They are used as mercenaries, and assassins by the high lords of terra, and the inquisition. They feature no imperial icons or decorations, cause they haven’t completed their penitence yet.

Each time they do a job for the high lords they get closer to completing their penitence. The one defining feature of them is the skull they paint onto their chest plate.

Edit: I forgot to mention that they were inspired by the punisher.

I’m honesty confused at how this person thinks we are the ones posting the ragebait.
Now I know I’am posting ragebait here, and that could be seen as counter intuitive, but I’m only second hand posting it.

Also what Is the addiction to representing themselves as anime cat girls, and us as orks.
I’m genuinely don’t understand why.

What are your thoughts?

As a digital artist this is stupid.
I got in an argument with witty and she never gave a reason that digital art isn’t art, that she gave everyone else.

What are your thoughts?

No, we don’t work for you.
Most of us are just amazed at how stupid someone can be.

Also you make a stupid, and insane take.
And now we know that you lurk on these sub Reddits.

What are your thoughts?

Ok, this is a really stupid take.
I’am a indie game dev, and coding is not the same as ai “art”. I still have full control over the code, and what I want it to do.

I spent hours troubleshooting, and tweaking it until it works. Apparently there are “similarities”, but they are very very different from each other.

Like when it comes to ai “art” the computer does everything.

Whereas coding I’am doing all the work, and the computer is just running that code, I can even stop it mid run time if it starts to break. I don’t think you can do that with ai “art”.

What are your thoughts?

This makes me very angry.

This is not something you take lightly. They’ve probably have never felt the pain, and the hurt of losing the ability to do the things you love, or watching someone you care about losing their ability to do the things they love.

I have watched people I care about lose their ability to do their hobbies, and interests. It really hurts watching them go through that.

It’s just showing that some ai-bros lack empathy.
I’am stop here before the post gets emotional for me.

What are your thoughts?

He’s all done, and ready for tabletop.
I would like an advice on how to paint flames, this was my first time doing it, and love to get some tips to help improve my technique.

They’re comparing two things that are very different.
There’s a different between getting your art stolen, and drawing someone inappropriately.

I’ve had my art stolen before and it sucks. But it’s disgusting for them to then make fun of people who are upset that their hard work got stolen.

What are your thoughts?

Remind me again who posted those warhammer comics trying to push a narrative, with characters and ips you don’t own.

Kinda odd that from those comic posts this doesn’t seem to apply to her. Also the fact that she made fun of people for reusing meme templates, but doesn’t that fall under what she’s claiming?

What are your thoughts?

Who said we’re ourselves comparing to SA victims? That’s not something you use lightly.

Having your art run through AI sucks, but it’s nothing compared to SA.
So according to witty artist aren’t allowed to complain, and talk about how it hurts having your art run through AI.

What are your thoughts?

Who the hell does she think she is?
Like seriously she’s just pulling this out of thin air.
I didn’t know someone could be this detached from reality.

I would also like to point out something, and maybe it’s just me. But does her OC when she makes posts like this kinda look like spawn.

What are your thoughts?

I saw this on my Reddit feed, even though I purged it of ai ragebait. Guess the system isn’t perfect, but anyway witty here is saying that Because digital art uses a computer it isn’t art.

What do you mean? The fourth and fifth picture I drew digitally. I drew them in blender with its 2D animation mode, and I drew them with the effort I would if I was drawing them with pencil and paper.

So I guess by her odd standards they aren’t art.
What are your thoughts?