u/Few_Rest2638

To elaborate, I’m trying to make a Entente vs Reichspakt Cold War scenario, and the only real places that can really be a socialist major power are India (which I’m going to give to the Entente) and China, which would thus mean that I should logically have the LKMT win there to ensure at least one major socialist power, but it feels a bit too close to irl, and I personally find the Federalists or Manchu coup Qing more interesting, but I think most people wouldn’t find it interesting and might think I’m doing it out wish political wish fulfillment or something like that. So would people find thing’s interesting anyway or otherwise care or should I just have the LKMT win. Sorry if this is weird or annoying

Sorry for asking so many questions, it’s because I’m trying to set up a Cold War scenario and have it matched by the game, something that can’t happen if WW3 happens for obvious reasons

Also this is an excuse to say I wish the Nightmareists had custom country paths too. sorry

Because I don’t really know the lore unlike in TNO, sorry

but what would the most Iconoclastic answer to Theodora‘s question at the start

and have been wondering of each mutually exclusive/choice projects, what ones would be the lest morally bankrup, considering many like the ones on Vheabos VI all seem pretty bad, and wanted to hear people opinions on these decisions and their reasoning

 

and I know the tag is Warhammer 3, but I want to know if it’s the case in the other games as well

Edit: Thanks everyone