Lala Firing Back At Mauricio
Lala put out a whole “clapback” podcast episode today responding to Mauricio calling her a liar, but I think the nuance here is important. Mauricio wasn’t calling her a liar for saying he DM’d her — he literally posted the DM himself. He was calling her a liar for the way she framed it publicly.
Lala said she never opened/read the message, yet she also shared that he asked her to get coffee — which naturally created a certain implication around the interaction. The issue is, the coffee line was at the end of the DM. So if she never actually read the message, how did she know that detail?
That’s why this feels less like an outright lie and more like intentional framing. Lala is incredibly media savvy and knows exactly how to present something in the most headline-generating way possible while still leaving herself wiggle room later. Listening back, it honestly felt like she knew the story would spark speculation, discourse, headlines, and podcast clicks… and it did. Now there’s an entire follow-up episode about it and everyone’s talking.
Not really taking either side because Mau DMing her at all is still a little weird. But if he felt she was intentionally presenting the exchange in a misleading way to imply something flirtier than reality, I can understand why he publicly pushed back. Curious what everyone else thinks.