i am building glyph.software - Turn your idea into a brand you can actually ship -
logo, design system and Vibe code easily.
There is a viral claim going around that every single AI prompt "drinks a full bottle of water." I wanted to see if that was true, so I built waterusedbyourAi a private, open-source browser extension that dynamically estimates the footprint of your chats.
The reality is that individual text prompts consume a fraction of a milliliter, not liters. This extension calculates the footprint based on token count, matches it to model profiles, and applies local grid electricity mixes and datacenter cooling overhead estimates.
Key features:
I wanted to build something highly polished and transparent. The code is fully open-source and easy to compile or install. Check it out and let me know what you think!
Repository: https://github.com/sumitttt4/waterusedbyourAi
A few weeks ago someone emailed me asking if my product could do one specific thing.
It wasn't planned, but it sounded useful, so I spent a couple of evenings building it. When it was done, I replied with "it's live now." Nothing. Never opened the email. Never logged in again. Completely ghosted me.
I was honestly annoyed because I kept thinking, "Why did I even spend time on this?" Then, maybe a week later, someone else signed up and used that feature almost immediately. Then another.
Neither of them was the person who originally asked for it. Weirdly, it changed how I think about feature requests. Now I don't look at who is asking as much as whether the problem probably exists for other people too.
Curious if anyone else has had something similar happen.
A user reached out asking for a feature that wasn't on my roadmap.
I spent a couple of days building it and let him know it was ready.
Never heard back.
I honestly thought I'd wasted my time.
Then two completely different customers signed up because that exact feature already existed.
It was a good reminder that the person asking for a feature isn't always the person you're building it for.
Has this happened to anyone else?
Every version gets compliments.
None get customers.
At this point I genuinely can't tell if the problem is the design, the positioning, or the product itself.
Glyph generates a complete brand identity (logo, colors, typography, guidelines) from a startup idea.
Would love brutally honest feedback:
What would stop you from trying it?
Link: glyph.software
If you landed on a site that promised:
"Build a launch-ready brand in minutes."
would you try it?
I've spent months building Glyph and weeks redesigning the homepage, but conversion is still much lower than I'd expect.
Looking for honest feedback before I redesign it for the 8th time.
Link: glyph.software
Update : Thank you so much for the advice i thought about all and updated a lot of things now
Earlier i forgot to add my conversion is lower (in 3 months i had revenue of 427$) so i posted this rn i added one time fee that is $59 reduced it from $99 let's hope now
Thank you again :)
I've spent the last few months building a branding tool for founders and studying hundreds of startup landing pages.
Drop your website below and I'll give you 3 actionable branding suggestions.
Could be:
- positioning
- typography
- colors
- messaging
- trust signals
- first impressions
No sales pitch. Just honest feedback.
The prompt of ui designing is the hardest part for me I don't know how to make a good design with prompt or what to prompt for an exact feature.
For most of the features I don't know the name of what is called how you guys design a clean ui with Lovable ?
The biggest vibe coder has said this so i thought why not ask vibe coders what they're doing.
i can not believe i can build this clean landing page with just one prompt man
Here is how i did it -
-> i went to glyph.software first created a brand identity
-> grabbed the vibe coding prompt from there
-> pasted this into the gemini canvas for just checking the result and im stunned
here is the link of gemini canvas - https://gemini.google.com/share/3d95adab9b9a
you can check out and decide this is so good for my workflow
It wasn't the product.
It was the brand.
So I built Glyph. Here's what it generated today (in replies)
That halftone sphere is computed dot by dot from the brand color. The spiral logo is parametric geometry — mathematically unique per brand, not picked from a library.
Full system exports too. Tailwind tokens, color scales, typography, brand board PDF.
14 paying customers. $427 revenue. Built solo.
What are you building this week?
Every MVP I shipped looked like a side project.
Not because the product was bad. Because I had no brand. Generic colors, random font, logo that looked like a favicon I found online.
Designers quoted me $500-1K. I said no every time.
So I built Glyph. Generates a complete brand system in 5 minutes logo, colors, typography, Tailwind tokens, brand board. Not mockups. Actual code you paste into your project.
3 months later:
14 paying customers
$427 revenue
Zero ad spend
Built completely solo
The thing that surprised me most founders don't want a logo. They want to stop being embarrassed by how their product looks when they show it to investors or post it on Twitter.
That's the real problem Glyph solves.
Shipped a parametric geometry logo engine this week. Mathematically generated marks Lissajous curves, golden ratio spirals, harmonic ribbons. Logos that actually look designed, not generated.
To anyone shipping an MVP this month — don't let the brand be the reason it looks unfinished.
Keep shipping.
The idea is simple:
Instead of generating just a logo, generate an entire brand system for a startup.
Logo, colors, typography, UI direction, and brand guidelines.
Would love to hear what you'd want in something like this.
I think founders spend too much time thinking about logos.
The real problem is consistency.
You can have an average logo and still look professional if your:
colors are consistent
typography is consistent
UI follows the same style
marketing assets match
Most MVPs fail at this.
That's why I've been building a tool that generates an entire brand system instead of only a logo.
Here's an early preview of Site : Glyph
Am I completely wrong here?
been using Antigravity for coding lately and overall its been good but there's this one thing that's been lowkey stressing me out
it deletes things from my codebase without telling me
happened multiple times now and every single time i had this mini heart attack moment of "wait did i write that or not" and then slowly realizing yeah i did write that, it was right there
the thing is i've caught it every time so far. partly because i'm paranoid enough to keep checking manually, partly luck. but that's not the point
the point is i shouldn't have to be paranoid. i shouldn't have to babysit every run wondering what it quietly removed this time. if you're making changes to my code just TELL me. that's it. that's the whole ask. even one line. "hey i removed this function because xyz" and i would have zero complaints
additions feel intentional. deletions feel like a mistake that got confident
and the worst part is that it doesn't feel like a bug. it feels like the model just assumes it knows better and doesn't think the removal is worth mentioning. which in some ways is scarier than a bug
still using it because honestly nothing else comes close for how fast i can move. but man this one behaviour is eating at me
if anyone else is using it just please stay on top of your git. seriously. every run
i've been building a brand audit tool for a few months and i've run it on hundreds of sites by now.
same mistakes keep showing up:
these three things alone are silently killing conversions on most startup sites.
drop your URL below. i'll tell you which ones you're making and how to fix them. free, no signup.
https://glyph.software/brand-audit if you want to do yourself then try it here
hit 200 signups on my AI branding tool today. feb to may, steady curve, never dropped.
SEO, reddit, and a free brand audit tool that google, perplexity and chatgpt started citing on their own without me doing anything.
the free tool was the best thing i built. took two days. outperforms everything else i spent weeks on.
12 paying customers so far. lifetime plan only after i watched monthly subscribers churn in the same week. that one change made a big difference.
still early. still figuring things out. but 200 feels like something worth sharing.
happy to answer anything about the growth side or tech stack.
SaaS - glyph.software for creating the brand identity for your site
Quick reality check.
Drop your project with:
Also answer this:
Why would someone pay instead of using ChatGPT, a spreadsheet, or doing it manually?
Here’s mine:
I’m building Glyph - https://glyph.software
It turns a startup idea into a brand system: logo direction, colors, typography, brand board, and AI builder prompt.
For indie hackers and SaaS founders who need a clean brand direction before launching.
Revenue so far: $408.
Share yours. I’ll give honest feedback where I can.
I used to think SEO is something you do later, after the product is already working.
But honestly, for small SaaS products, I think SEO should start early.
Not in a complicated way. Just basic things:
Social posts can spike and disappear in one day. SEO is slow, but if it works, it keeps bringing people while you’re not posting.
I’m starting to think every SaaS should have at least 5–10 useful SEO pages before worrying too much about fancy growth hacks.
Curious how others here got their first organic users.
Did SEO work for you early, or did it only start working after months?
Hey everyone,
I’ve been working on a tool called Glyph.
The idea is simple: you type what you’re building, and it generates a complete starting brand system for it not just a logo.
It creates things like:
this is my site's card - if u want for your site you can create free or dm me
I built it because I kept seeing founders spend too much time stuck on “how should this project look?” before even launching.
Glyph is not meant to replace a designer. It is more like a fast starting point when you need a brand direction, landing page vibe, and usable assets quickly.
There’s a free preview, so you can try it without paying.
Would love feedback from other builders here:
Does this feel useful for early-stage projects, or is branding something you still prefer doing manually?
Link: https://glyph.software
