Anthropic 2T IPO and VCX SPV impact.

VCX currently has about 22% of its asset value in Anthropic via 2 SPVs which are marked to the 900B valuation round. RIC rules for CEFs dictate concentration limits which we have discussed here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/VCX_Fundrise/comments/1tvvr3z/rics_rule_around_vcx_and_my_best_guess_on_price/

At that time the consensus seemed to be that you don't have to liquidate anything if an asset appreciates. That was clearly wrong since one SPV out of the 3 was sold in the previous quarter. u/JB-M88 here was helpful enough to point out that according to the Federal Register it is a value test and not a cost basis test and it will trigger a liquidation which is exactly what happened.
https://www.reddit.com/r/VCX_Fundrise/comments/1w2sup8/comment/p6z6ctp/

So now the question is if Anthropic IPOs at any number above 1.1T what happens since we breach the 25% limit? VCX cannot sell the shares on IPO day due to the lockup. Does this mean that they will be forced to sell another SPV before hand (and will that be at a discount to the 900B round like the last sale)? I welcome any thoughts that people may have.

There is also the other liquidation for the OpenAI SPVs on the horizon for the same reason if the talk of another round ever materializes.

Tell me how VCX ever gets back to even $35 on the back of these facts?

reddit.com
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 5 days ago

PWRL moves forward the unlock (24 Sep) and declares 6% dividend on NAV

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2052053/000121390026102338/ea0306345-01_497ad.htm

“The Countdown Is Over
** **
The original shareholder lock-ups were temporary - designed to support an orderly direct listing and the development of a public market for PWRL. That job is done.
 
Effective September 24th, we are waiving all remaining lock-up restrictions in PWRL’s lock-up agreements with non-affiliated shareholders, roughly two months ahead of schedule. PWRL is now a public fund, and from here we should be judged on the things that matter: NAV, portfolio decisions, realizations, reporting, and how we treat shareholders. That is exactly where we want to be.”

Does the language sound familiar? They’ve declared a dividend at 6% to help with the price for the next quarter. Buybacks didn’t do the trick so a new strategy.

reddit.com
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 22 days ago

VCX ATM NAV Impact

https://preview.redd.it/kx0qyf1h3qph1.png?width=1026&format=png&auto=webp&s=20efbebf47c98e397574ce65901680cd51c8e482

VCX published the ATM filing on the morning of the September 10th. The previous day VCX had closed at $37.59. The last published NAV for September 8th 2026 was $21.70 with 35,797,138 shares outstanding. We are getting close to breaching 30 which sits almost halfway from the $38 when the ATM started. The table above shows how the volume has been (it took all of about 4 days, the power of selling pressure, they will keep selling above $22). About 1.8 million shares. ATMs would typically do no more than 10% of the daily volume (likely less but let's go with the high number). This means they have so far sold about 180k shares at an average price of about $32, which raises $5.76 million. This would lead to an uplift of 16 cents to the NAV. Let's assume the rest of the way down is the same. So we get about 30 cents lift to the NAV and a great $12 million worth of investable cash!! And then it shall be what has been going on with these below.

https://preview.redd.it/98a2r4oh4qph1.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=705c9505f6739cbcf5d3b5e341aad83f5f0d4315

https://preview.redd.it/ikn2fy7k4qph1.png?width=687&format=png&auto=webp&s=62767423e1f8b796bc8bd2fc18c0caf639adde64

Been heck of a ride I tell ya. Good for the ones who were able to cash in while it lasted! MBAs and Money Ninja's can now keep promoting the stock on their subs/blogs.

reddit.com
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 30 days ago

PWRL 40-APP filing and possible VCX implications?

This just dropped. PWRL had launched a second fund called PWRL Fund II. Now they are filing for relief from RIC rules so that both the funds can co-invest in SPVs which is otherwise prohibited by law. It is worth reading this.

I am wondering how this impacts what has been going on with the VCX Anthropic stake which was sold. As a lot of people have speculated here that it could be VCX-II or OVF, I wonder how the same issues highlighted in this PWRL filing impact the assessment of what has gone on the VCX side. The only plausible way they sold at below secondary market value (which is what the books suggest since the $965B round gain was not booked on the sale) would have been a sale to a related entity.

Anyone have thoughts on this?

sec.gov
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 1 month ago

VCX N2 dropped today.

Some highlights:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1867090/000121390026098443/ea0266821-03_n2asr.htm#sai_001

https://preview.redd.it/n13xeuj4cloh1.png?width=967&format=png&auto=webp&s=d06695b0d19c9a3b2ad447426ec7ee304df8c81c

The Adviser may seek recoupment from the Fund of any fees waived or expenses paid or reimbursed to the Fund for a period ending three years after the date of the waiver, payment or reimbursement, subject to the limitation that the recoupment will not cause the Fund’s Operating Expenses to exceed the lesser of (a) the expense limitation amount in effect at the time such fees were waived or expenses paid or reimbursed, or (b) the expense limitation amount in effect at the time of the recoupment. On January 14, 2026, the Board, at the Adviser’s recommendation, approved terminating the Expense Limitation Agreement as of the listing of the Fund on the Exchange.

They still have some glaring errors which I hope they correct via an amendement:

https://preview.redd.it/s1gtdrskcloh1.png?width=968&format=png&auto=webp&s=a2ed6fe69ab76b191e2d0a76e58981047d762e6c

For some reason the NAV is still mentioned as $18.97 as of June end. Further it seems like no material change in the NAV as of yesterday. So it is still at $21.70.

https://preview.redd.it/zzluinf5dloh1.png?width=948&format=png&auto=webp&s=df3bb36c7fcf46c9be2b4247ca3ae014c09c08e0

They have always had an ATM authorization but they haven't started yet.

EDIT: Now we know that NAV was indeed $21.70 on Sep 8 and the ATM has started
https://www.reddit.com/r/VCX_Fundrise/comments/1wcifcz/vcx_424b2_out_atm_is_on_nav_still_2170_as_of_sep_8/

u/Fit_Equal6932 — 1 month ago

DXYZ Fund manager bought stock last week!

Filing just dropped and those candles are due to this. He bought about $1.7 million worth over 3 days.

sec.gov
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 1 month ago

Flagship Fund shareholder Report out, 1.16 million VCX shares back on the ledger as of June 30th.

Previous quarter for comparison:
https://cdn.sanity.io/files/ivaqw3e8/production-public/2e06b948b8210b5f36ad1cb519e2aabd1fd5a1b5.pdf

The balance of shares is mentioned here https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1777677/000177767726000056/xslFormNPORT-P_X01/primary_doc.xml

to be exactly: 1163216.03000000

This is as of June 30th, they resumed selling in July and based on what we know there are 480k shares yet to be sold/reported sold per the 144 filings.

If you look at the filings above these shares were handed over to Plume, a tokenization company in March for a promissory note. These shares are now back, we are not sure about the motivations. The VCX valuation in March at $575 would have tripped the concentration limit issues so was this done as a way to get around those, we simply don't know and I don't think we will ever get the answers from the management.

Nonetheless the mystery of the missing shares is solved. The fund is down 100mm in assets between the 2 quarterlies. The other curious thing is that the fund also has a stake in Fluidstack that is exactly the same size as the VCX Fluidstack holding. Screenshots for everything in comments.

cdn.sanity.io
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 1 month ago

HODL VCX Forever 🚀

For the sake of balanced coverage and to gauge the interest of holders (since these kinds of posts are always a hit and get many more likes than the sensible seeming ones). Please upvote to your hearts content.

FULL DISCLOSURE: With all the new information I am comfortable going short come Monday. I’ve already sold my 8200 VCX shares as of Aug 21st.

reddit.com
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 2 months ago

Say something, do something else!

So why was 1/3rd of Anthropic in VCX sold at a discount to the 380B valuation mark?

u/Fit_Equal6932 — 2 months ago

Stay away from snake oil sellers and their pathetic attempts at covering their ass!

These were not proforma estimates based on the March 31 snapshot, the dude never looked at the N-PORT and used the Feb 15th VCX website table which was missing 250 million or 40% dilution for the last minute VCX investments before listing. He claims to have worked at Goldman Sachs IPO division. He is not listed on FINRA BrokerCheck (all current and former securities industries professionals can be looked up) I had pointed out his error in a comment on his blog but he censored it.

WARNING!! This guy has gone back and edited the whole post instead of a new one to explain the situation. Here is the original, I had the foresight to preserve evidence.
https://archive.ph/Lzhj2

Some gems from his edited post:

"That includes the thing I have not seen reported anywhere. VCX Quietly Sold A Third Of Its Anthropic Position during the quarter, at the old price, right before marking the rest of it up."

I have alerts for filings and pick them up within 3 minutes. I posted the deets just five minutes later. I bet you this guy read all this from my post and now claims "I have not seen reported anywhere". He doesn't have the smarts to read a goddamn filing and uses AI. While a bunch of us here combed through the last 4 N-PORTS by hand to understand what happened. VCX N-PORTS and filings are the most opaque ever, they literally have renamed some of the SPVs to make it harder to connect the dots between sequential filings. Go look at DXYZ filings for comparison and the valuation notes and you shall understand what I mean.

"Why did it happen? Nobody knows, and I want to be careful here."

"The vehicle was a third-party SPV, so it may have simply reached the end of its life and distributed on its own schedule rather than Fundrise choosing to sell. It could be deliberate risk management, trimming a position that had roughly doubled. It could be something else."

Fundrise never saw the double return. They sold at a discount to the stale value. Ben Miller needs to explain this. This guy overlooks all of this. Never poses a question to Fundrise management which every investor should now after how the filings have panned out. Then he says this:
"As someone who worked in finance, is an LP in multiple tier-one VC funds, and lives in San Francisco where half my friends run money, I'm confident the demand for this IPO will be extraordinary."

He is intimately involved in VC funds and has friends everywhere yet he doesn't know why SPV was liquidated and speculates nonsense. He should be well aware of these things based on his claim and it is a simple matter of getting the info through his sources in the VC circle about HOF Capital. Yeah he runs VC firms, half his friends run money and the best investment he could find and all he ever talks about is Fundrise lol!

"VCX deployed $64.3 million during the quarter. About $54.3 million of it went into vehicles whose legal names identify no underlying company at all. The fund says so itself, right in the schedule: the legal name of an investment vehicle may not identify the underlying company to which the fund has economic exposure."

"Private funds structure through SPVs for real reasons, including access. But it does mean the thing you're actually buying got harder to see, not easier, in the first full quarter after the fund went public."

"That scarcity is on a countdown clock. SpaceX is already public. OpenAI is targeting 2027. Anthropic has filed and will likely list at the end of 2026. Every IPO gives investors a way to buy each company directly, so the premium should erode over time."

"The author has no obligation to update this report." Yet he did, what a pathetic sack!

Did he ever tell anyone on his blog the common sense stuff I have been warning y'all:
https://www.reddit.com/r/VCX_Fundrise/comments/1tvvr3z/rics_rule_around_vcx_and_my_best_guess_on_price/
https://www.reddit.com/r/VCX_Fundrise/comments/1t5lc7d/spv_valuation_complexities_for_tickers_like_vcx/

I don't even claim to have worked at GS yet even I could see through the risks and this guy claims to have worked on IPOs and has no understanding of risks, he just builds castles in the sky. Classic con-artist.

Looks like he keeps coming back with his proxy accounts to downvote this. I don't care, I personally won't take his advice, but if people think this is useful context then they can upvote this post.

u/Fit_Equal6932 — 2 months ago
▲ 15 r/VCX_Fundrise+1 crossposts

VCX N-PORT out NAV prints @ 21.70, surprise datacenter markdown.

Fund-Level Comparison

Metric Mar 31, 2026 Jun 30, 2026 Change
Total assets $701,493,299.35 $813,141,712.26 +$111.6M (+15.9%)
Total liabilities $22,575,190.72 $36,173,350.34 +$13.6M
Net assets (NAV) $678,918,108.63 $776,968,361.92 +$98.1M (+14.4%)
Cash & equivalents $75,717,714.39 $60,828,531.65 -$14.9M
Monthly total return (final month reported) 3.89% 14.39% —
Net unrealized appreciation (final month reported) $24,527,255.74 $86,104,132.74 +$61.6M
Holding Mar 31, 2026 Value Jun 30, 2026 Value Change % of NAV (Mar → Jun)
Vantage Data Centers – VDCM 2025-AZ D (9M principal) $9,096,660.00 $8,943,405.30 -$153,254.70 (-1.7%) 1.34% → 1.15%

Updates (as I dig more):
Anduril is another surprise markdown, down from 37.35 mm to 26.8 despite a new 2x round. This is bizarre. I wonder if this is an SPV haircut issue or not. It is reported via 8VC ANSE SPV, now 3.4% of the fund.

HOF Capital AG Follow On, LLC which was one of the 3 Anthropic SPVs in the fund and was 5.3% of the fund as in the last N-PORT has been liquidated and is missing in the current N-PORT. This is further confirmed by looking at the ledger. Fund had 15 million less cash at hand than last time 15 million more debt and made 65 million in new investments, that shortfall is exactly what liquidating the 36 million SPV would fill in the gap. For the other SPVs the markup is only 2.27 and not 2.4 as implied by the 380 -> 900 revaluation. So those have a haircut built in.
EDIT to above: If you take the Visual Layer exit as well then it means the exit from Anthropic and Visual layer paid about $34 million in total for the two investments which were valued at $41 million in the previous N-PORT, this means those were sold at a 20% discount to the last N-PORT.

Here is another bombshell and one of the other main explanations for NAV printing below projections. March N-PORT SpaceX piece at 1.25 trillion valuation was $26.85 million, on June 30 when SpaceX closed at $171 the company market cap was $2.25T so you would expect a markup of 1.8x but we see the actual mark at 33.1 or just 1.23x, that is a huge haircut! ~30%

Ramp revalued +33% exactly like the RVI markup, this was also a markup we hadn't anticipated. This is good but means we lost more elsewhere.

Debt increased, we have 5 reverse repo agreements with Barclays totaling 30.5mm as opposed to 3 in the prior cycle totaling 15.9mm so a net addition of 14.6mm

Complete picture: The NAV came in lower than the projections for 4 main reasons.

-One of the 3 Anthropic SPVs were liquidated (off the books now, previously 5.3% of the fund),

-SpaceX had a huge haircut (1.23x vs 1.8x we expected implying 30% haircut),

- Anduril markdown by 30%

- Doubling of debt from 15 to 30 million.

3 of the 4 star holdings have had issues in this valuation cycle as you can see, and this comes back to treating SPVs very carefully. We don't know how the OpenAI SPVs will shakeout. So there you have it. People who were calling us out for not knowing our math and undervaluing things at 24-25 can have it now and it has printed $21.70

Regarding Service Titan which had an IPO in Dec 2024 the fund sold all the stake before March of this year so they kept the stock for about a year. So they sold in 6 months past the lockup. This is the only example we have of a listed holding that was liquidated. We shall see what happens with SpaceX.

And I do get to say I have told y'all about this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/VCX_Fundrise/comments/1tvvr3z/rics_rule_around_vcx_and_my_best_guess_on_price/
https://www.reddit.com/r/VCX_Fundrise/comments/1t5lc7d/spv_valuation_complexities_for_tickers_like_vcx/

https://hofcapital.com/team
This is HOF Capital, VCX's OpenAI and Anthropic SPV, I dunno how much of a special access it is to just call these guys with a bag of cash and get in on an SPV.

P.S.: Thinking more about this as to why the NAV underperformed so much for even the most bearish of our estimates. I think there is a lot of leeway in valuation methodology. Before listing any new markup used to be perfectly reflected in the NAV using just the new valuation round for a holding and you could calculate it and get the same number. This made all of us treat it as a good and simple way to project the future NAV. It suited them since the fund had to list and they could update based on the best case scenario and not show the haircuts. But now that has changed since we've had a couple of liquidation events, the skeletons in the closet that are the SPV haircuts are tumbling and this underperforms even the most sober estimates.

sec.gov
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 2 months ago

DXYZ NAV updates @ $34.30 (June 30) Anthropic 14.4%, 3 new investments.

Portfolio Deployment Update

 

Subsequent to the quarter ended June 30, 2026, we continued to actively deploy capital. As of August 27, 2026, we fully closed 3 additional investments representing approximately $169.0 million in added portfolio exposure, as described below, which we funded using our existing cash and cash equivalents.

 On August 13, 2026, we invested an additional $150.0 million in Goanna Capital 26E LLC (invested in OpenAI Group PBC Class A Common Stock).

 On July 16, 2026, we invested $15.0 million in Magnitude FSTK, LLC (invested in Fluidstack Ltd Series B Preferred Shares).

 On August 4, 2026, we invested $4.0 million in Boom Technology, Inc. through a Simple Agreement for Future Equity.

At-the-Market Offering

 From April 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026, we sold a total of 17,191,674 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $34.25 per share under the Open Market Sale Agreement^(SM) with Jefferies LLC. The net proceeds as a result of these sales of common stock were $715,442,732, after deducting commissions and fees.

A $10 lift to NAV in a quarter ($24.56 -> $34.30) while picking up the OpenAI stakes from 2% to about 9%. Longer term the NAV has gone from $4.86 to $34.30 in 28 months so about 7x return.

sec.gov
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 2 months ago

"this hasn't happened yet, but we see it playing out with BMNR. for 3 weeks straight they bought back their shares at a discount to NAV"

https://www.reddit.com/r/FundriseInvestors/comments/1w0884h/question_texted_from_a_friend_who_followed_me/
Since I can't comment there, two points:

  1. We are now comparing VCX to BMNR a crypto YOLO ticker, not an investment.
  2. Money for buying back VCX from where Vincenzo? I thought there was no cash anymore. Did you see how the buybacks are going for PWRL?
u/Fit_Equal6932 — 2 months ago