

Revisiting "The Verdict": The one bit of blatant misinformation that made me put the whole thing in the Junk bucket.
Tbh there was also the bit where Diane Dimond proudly reveals her own copies of the books she thought Michael should be imprisoned for owning. But I digress.
The documentary falsely claimed that this painting is a recreation of The Last Supper by Leonardo da Vinci, with Michael taking the place of Jesus Christ.
It also edited the photo of the painting, placing a spooky black cloud around the edges.
How can anyone expect detractors to be taken seriously, when this kind of nonsense is their standard tactic?
The figures in the painting aren't the Apostles.
There's no food or wine on the table.
The commissioned artist has stated emphatically that no such comparison was asked for or intended.
The bare minimum of research was ignored.
Like Leaving Neverland and numerous other anti-MJ hit pieces, The Verdict should never have been called a "documentary".
Yes, documentaries always include some facts in preference to others.
Yes, documentaries always go along with a certain point of view.
But a film that openly presents verifiable fictions as if they are verifiable facts, should not be qualified as a "documentary".
Like Leaving Neverland, it's a fantasy.