u/GINTAMAZZZZZZ

I just noticed another connection between Puppet and Faded-text in the logbook

In FNAF2 we have the easter egg of when Puppet is freed, it will cause hallucinations to the cameras, showing a FADED out translucent Puppet on your camera screens (see first 3 images)

So we have a direct connection between Puppet and being faded out translucent layer and affecting physical things super-naturally (the cameras)

But then in UCN Scott actually brings this detail back, with Nightmarionne, who fades in and out depending on if you have your cursor on it

Might Faded-text really be Puppet after all?🧐🔍

One thing I have always wondered, is why Scott replaced Jeremy with Cassidy in the novels, and what the reason behind it is.

As with FNAF6 + logbook, he established these 6 names from the games. Jeremy being Bonnie, and Cassidy being another distinct spirit.

But then with the fourth closet, he decides that in the novel universe, he replaces Bonnies spirit Jeremy, with instead the other spirit Cassidy and makes her Bonnie instead.

The big question is, why did he have to do this in the novel universe?

And I think it might tell us something about who Cassidy is in the games, by how he had to do this decision.

What's most interesting about the decision, is that he replaced a GameName with another GameName, meaning the Jeremy's name doesn't exist in the novels then. Meaning we have then an example of a Name only existing in one continuity and not the other.

-

We have an example of 1 name (Jeremy) not being used by both continuities, and it being replaced by the name Cassidy specifically in its place.

-

Since in the novels he has replaced a GameName with another GameName, there now is a GameName removed, and a void in its place.

-

What fills this void, is the name Charlotte, a name that doesn't appear in the games just the novels. Just like how the name Jeremy doesn't exist in the novels.

And what name was used to replace Jeremy's name? Cassidy

And what was the name used to fill the void of Jeremy's name being replaced by Cassidy? Charlotte

There is some connection between the names, Cassidy, Jeremy and Charlotte. And having to replace names and switch around or remove between continuities.

-

I see this connection between the 3, the Trinity of Cassidy, Jeremy and Charlotte:

- Puppet doesn't exist in the novels (Cassidy in games) (Jeremy doesn't exist in novels either)

- Therefore had to remove Jeremy to make room for her (That's why Jeremy was erased)

- Jeremy name is now removed and is a name only in the games, not novels.

But since we replaced a GameName with a GameName, removing a GameName in the process, we need to see what name would have filled in that void that was created by Scott removing a GameName, which name fills this void?

And the name that fills this void, is Charlotte. Which is a name like Jeremy's that only appears in one continuity, is the name that fills in this void, suggesting to me that Cassidy is the name of the Puppet in the games, and that's why he had to do all of that.

CassidyPuppet is invitable✅🎁😁

Something I have never understood, is how it seems like a large portion of the community are certain that, even though Edwin very explicitely said he will NOT try to recreate David specifically, they still think he decided to do it anyways

I genuinely don't know where this certainty comes from
:

The story and timeline goes like this:

- David dies

- M1-Fiona suggests for Edwin to make another mimic endo, like her, to be David

- She keeps insisting on it, even though he keeps saying no

- Eventually Edwin snaps, and says "For the last time, NO! It wouldn't be him.". Saying he will NOT do it. Then realizing how stupid he has been, having a robot raise his kid and his current life situation, then gets then angry at M1-Fiona. Says she isn't REALLY her, and says he NEVER wants to hear from her again, EVER.

- This is presumably when he locks M1-Fiona down into the basement

- Edwin at this point is struggling financially, his business is failing, and he has to try to save it somehow, so he tries to make M2 as a product. An Endo that can fit inside any costume or character

- This project gets leaked by the employees working there, the employees know about M2 project as it's a product he is planning to recreate and sell, but that it simply is just not ready yet

- Then mysteriously as he is trying to make another Mimic program (possibly due to Davids spirit, as this is the tape played right before we see his spirit), it suddenly, begins mimicking David. Making Edwin infurated, and lash out and destroy it.

:

So this is the timeline we know, and I don't know where in this timeline people got the idea that Edwin changed his mind (??) and just decided to try to make specifically David again when he said very clearly he will not

1. There is literally 0 evidence he decides to change his mind on it. In the tape he literally says he will NOT do it with 100% certainty, he is so sure about himself that he literally locks away Fiona as he has come to the realization that it isn't actually really them, it's like a character lesson for him.

For him to off-screen, and randomly change his mind with no explanation given, lacks any evidence so
:

2. People use the fact that M2 being created, inherently means he wanted to recreate David specifically again. But not much supports this, and there's a lot of evidence against this

- The employees of the company knows about the M2 project and is part of the companies projects, this doesn't make sense if it's only something personal he was developing by himself. The sales pitch Fazbear got even said stuff like "an Endo that can fit in any costume and any character", which sounds like a product description, and this is what was leaked by the Murray employees

- Then the big counter point being too, that if he really did change his mind, even knowing it's not actually him, and decided he wanted this. It doesn't make much sense that he gets infurated the second M2 begins mimicking David, if this was his sole reason for making M2, why would he instantly get angry when it does the thing he wants it to do and has been trying to get it to do so lol
:

I am not saying it is impossible btw, it's entirely possible, it's just that it's a leap to make and lacks evidence, and there is tons of counter evidence to it.

So I am just very confused why a lot of people treat this as a fact, I think this is the interpretation nearly all FNAFtubers have, yet I don't see there being nearly any evidence for it

It could be that I have missed some detail somewhere too though, so feel free to share if you think there's something important I have missed🙂

Something I haven’t seen anyone mention before is how in the FNAF3 minigames the Puppet seems to have jumped Minigames

As each minigame belongs to a dead child, except mysteriously Mangles quest

Happiest Day = Golden Freddy spirit
BB’s air adventure = Freddy spirit

Mangle’s quest = No spirit here

Chica’s party = Chica’s spirit
Stage01 = Foxy’s spirit
Glitch Stage01 = Bonnies spirit

And with the big Puppet being there in mangles quest

And there being 2 spirit children in Happiest Day, Puppet and Golden Freddy spirit

My interpretation of this is that the Puppet spirit jumped minigame from Mangle’s quest, over to Happiest Day, and is now there with Golden Freddy kid and wants to help him

Something I noticed that I have never seen anyone talk about before is how with FFPS + Logbook (which released at the same time), Scott was very focused on in the game universe giving every significant character something relating to their Name, except mysteriously, the Puppet / Henry's Daughter🤔

Micheal = We get his name revealed in the SL cutscene leading up to FNAF6, Mike logbook

HenRY = We get a direct hint to this characters name with HRY and what we learn about him

Baby = We get the reveal that her name is Elizabeth, for the first time in the ending

Core 4 Animatronics = We get their names on their names on their graves

Purple guy (Forgot to include in image) = Was revealed to be Afton in SL, but in credits of FNAF6 William Afton

Crying Child = In the logbook he is asked if he can remember his Name, which he responds IT'S ME (The important part being his Name being referenced)

??? Mystery character = A mysterious spirit, who knows who it is, is given the name "Cassidy"

So as you can see, every significant character in the FNAF6 story gets their Name directly referenced in some way through the games continuitiy. Scott wanted to make a reference to every significant characters name in the game continuity, every single significant character in the FNAF6 story

But do you notice how one very important character to the FNAF6 story is mysteriously missing here?🤔

The Puppet / Henry's daughter. There is 0, not a single reference to her name in the games + Logbook. Isn't this really weird?

EVERY other significant character to the FNAF6 story get their name referenced in FNAF6 + Logbook, everyone, except for some reason The Puppet.

But is this really the case? Did Scott really make a reference to 10 other characters Names but just left out Puppet's name?

Well.. we do have one odd out name, "Cassidy".

This odd one out name, that appears in the logbook, belongs to a character we don't really know who is, all we know about them is:

- Is more aware than Crying Child

- Is there together with Crying Child

- Wants to help him out, and references to Happiest Day (Which we know is directly first and foremost connected to Crying Child)

- Mysteriously draws a Puppet-like toy too

All of these details, actually perfectly aligns with the Puppet / Henry's daughter interestingly enough. Isn't that interesting how all these characteristics of "Cassidy" perfectly aligns with the Puppet?🤔

So wait..

What if Scott didn't actually mysteriously leave out leaving any direct reference to Puppets name in the games continuity

And what if this "Cassidy" spirit, that has so many overlaps with the Puppet, actually just is the name of the spirit posessing the Puppet

Maybe these 2 odd out details, are meant to actually fit together.

That is my interpretation, but feel free to disagree. And to anyone that does disagree though I would like to ask them if they also find it odd how Scott made sure to reference 10 game continuity characters Names directly, but for some reason, decided to exclude the Puppet's name and make no direct reference to her name at all, isn't that at the very least an odd detail?🙂

TLDR;

Scott goes out of his way to reference the Name directly of All 10 significant characters, but for some reason.. leaves no reference at all to the Puppet spirits name, or did he? Could it be that the mysterious "Cassidy" name, actually belongs to the Puppet?

I have always found it interesting how on the first page, she draws the phone that belongs to Crying Child. But then on the second page she asks about 3 other toys too, one of them mysteriously being a Puppet toy, why would she draw a Puppet toy, did she have a Puppet toy?🤔

My theory behind this is that:

1st page = For Crying Child:
- Phone toy that belongs to Crying Child

- A boy doll since he's a boy

2nd page = Cassidy's toys:

- A Puppet in a box toy

- A girl doll since she's a girl

Under my interpretation, I think she drew this Puppet-like toy because it's something from her memories, that she is Henry's daughter and her name is Cassidy

But to those who don't think Henry's daughter is faded text, I do wonder why Cassidy or Scott for that matter, had Cassidy draw very significantly a Puppet toy, which I feel like has to mean something🤔

I am a 100% CassidyPuppet believer and the only big counter arguments to it has been

"But the 100% reliable The Ultimate Guide and Character encyclopedia calls her Charlotte implied for games too"

So I do wonder how funny it would be if the (HOPEFULLY) improved character encyclopedia straight up just calls her Cassidy and throws fanon Cassidy into the shadow realm lol

Something I never see people talk about is the fact that Crying Child's response to being asked his name, is spamming IT'S ME throughout the word search, and then asking the 2nd spirit (Cassidy) who they are and what their name is

Isn't this a pretty big piece of evidence Crying Child is Golden Freddy? As he is spamming

IT'S ME lol

I don't see anyone talking about it, but it's actually been an unusually long time with 0 information on what the next game / DLC is

In the last 5 years the longest we have had to wait without knowing what the next project is, is 2 months and 5 months, while right now we have gone 11 months without knowing at all what the next game is

Do any of you guys know when we could expect an announcement for the next game?🤔

For a while now a counter argument I have heard for BV being the Happiest Day reciever is that in FNAF World even though Yellow eyes says the pieces are in place for him, he still needs to find them

And people have used this line to mean that BV is actually finding the pieces to set up Happiest day for someone else, and that if it was for him, he wouldn't need to find them, he would just recieve the pieces.

And I just thought of a detail that I don't know how I didn't think of sooner.

Earlier in the game, when our task for the game is given, the whole purpose behind the clock route, is to help a "him" specifically "find his way". So the game actually already establishes that whoever the "him" is (BV), doesn't just do nothing and then Happiest day just happens to him, he is still the one that ultimately in some way needs to "find his way", and we are helping him with that

I am so glad I discovered this detail😊