AITA for not wanting shared money used for “family generosity” without agreement?
My wife and I are both in our early 30s. We have been together for about 10 years and married for about a year.
We often argue about money and her family. In her family, it seems normal to be very generous, refuse money, pay for others during outings, or treat reimbursements as gifts. I am not against helping family and I do not want to count every cent. But I see a difference between deliberately giving a gift and automatically paying with shared money.
One example: we have bees and produce honey. My wife’s mother sometimes sells our honey to her coworkers. My wife says her mother should just keep the money. I find that strange because it is our honey, our work, and our costs. I would have no issue gifting her honey or saying, “You can keep the money this time.” But I do not think the money should automatically become hers just because she sold it.
If I pick something up for someone in her family for around €30–40, I see that as something to be reimbursed unless we agreed it was a gift. My wife thinks that in a family, this can simply be gifted.
Once, her family helped us while we were away. Their expenses were around €25. Shortly afterwards, they gave us a money gift. My wife still transferred them significantly more than their actual expenses. To me, it felt like she was trying to “pay back” a gift immediately.
Another time, we looked after an older family member from her side for two days. We bought small items, brought food, and drove there several times. Direct costs were around €40–50 plus driving. Afterwards, that person offered to invite us for coffee and cake. I would have accepted because it was voluntary. My wife did not want to, so we paid for ourselves.
At a family outing with several adults, we ended up paying the entrance fees for everyone, even though it had not been clearly discussed as our invitation. Later someone else covered a small thing, but it did not feel proportional.
There was also a larger family gift where we were expected to contribute more. Someone much closer to the recipient contributed much less. The recipient is not financially worse off than we are, so I found the expectation difficult.
My wife says I am being stingy and that “this is how family works.” She also says that if you suggest an activity, you should be prepared to pay for everyone. I disagree. To me, “Do you want to do something together?” is not automatically “I am paying for everyone.” An invitation should be clear.
I am fine with generosity when it is conscious and agreed upon. What bothers me is when shared money, shared products, or shared work are treated as automatically available for her family, while accepting voluntary invitations or reimbursements feels almost forbidden.
AITA for wanting reimbursements to be allowed, voluntary invitations accepted, and larger gifts or money decisions involving shared resources discussed beforehand?