The Gig Is Up: UNC Health Does an About-Face on BidShift
▲ 27 r/chapelhill+1 crossposts

The Gig Is Up: UNC Health Does an About-Face on BidShift

The Gig Is Up: UNC Health Does an About-Face on BidShift
https://www.theassemblync.com/news/health/healthcare/unc-health-bidshift-nurses-tech-platform-auction/

The hospital system’s plan to make nurses bid against each other for extra shifts ignited a social media firestorm and was quickly abandoned. Still, some fear the attempt signals what’s ahead.

by Johanna F. Still | September 17, 2026 | The Assembly

When UNC Health invited the 4,000 nurses working in its Chapel Hill hospitals to join a new system in July to pick up extra shifts, it did not go over well.

Using the software program BidShift, UNC’s hospitals planned to match nurses who were willing to work extra hours with units that needed more help during hard-to-fill shifts.

These shifts—mostly on nights, weekends, and holidays—were offered at premium rates, roughly $10.50 above normal hourly pay. They were entirely optional and available only after nurses hit their baseline hours. 

But that was less than the roughly $13-an-hour premium UNC Health had been paying most nurses to fill coverage gaps, and it was about a third of the $35-per-hour premium the hospital offered before the pandemic, one senior UNC charge nurse told The Assembly. 

“I guess they thought we couldn’t do basic math,” said the nurse, who requested anonymity to avoid retaliation.

The extra compensation would also decrease incrementally as nurses “bid” against each other for the shifts. UNC staffing assured its nurses that it would consider other factors, such as skill levels, when making final decisions. But, generally speaking, if a nurse volunteered to work on Thanksgiving for $10.50 an hour above their normal rate, he or she could “lose” that shift to someone willing to work for less. 

Word of UNC’s plan to implement BidShift went viral soon after it posted the first open shifts July 22. In a swarm of online skepticism, critics described it as “dystopian” and “cartoonishly evil.” 

“Work more, for less!” one nursing content creator sarcastically told his 8,000 TikTokfollowers. “What’s not to love?”

UNC Health initially defended its use of the platform. “Participation is completely voluntary,” spokesperson Alan Wolf wrote in an August 4 statement to The Assembly. But by August 7, the health system relented. In an email to employees, UNC Medical Center’s president, Min Lee, called its initial description of how BidShift worked “a mistake.”

“Work more, for less! What’s not to love?”

nursing TikToker

“I am truly sorry for the confusion and angst this has caused,” she wrote. 

Between statewide nursing staffing shortages and growing skepticism over the role artificial intelligence will play in health care, UNC’s timing couldn’t have been worse. Some nurses fear algorithmic staffing signals what’s ahead.

A ‘Desperation Premium’

Staffing a hospital is unlike other workplaces. Patient traffic can be unpredictable, skill sets are specialized, the stakes are high, and the doors never close. Nurses are the backbone of any hospital setting. 

And, compared with many other professionals, state-licensed nurses have considerable flexibility in where and when they work. Demand in certain regions is often so high that nurses can supplement their incomes by hopping between facilities and taking temporary assignments where they’re needed most, instead of staying in a full-time role at one location. 

Hospital managers can expect certain units to be busier at certain times, and they know which shifts will be tougher to fill. They typically set work schedules six weeks in advance, balancing each unit for skills and experience levels. But when someone calls out, or there’s an unexpected rush, it can be a scramble to fill shifts.

That is the problem BidShift, which launched in 2002, was created to address. Its algorithm lets hospitals fill shifts more reliably and for less money than they’d shell out for travel nurses, who often make considerably more than staff nurses. While that might have seemed like a great idea two decades ago, the cultural optimism about how technology can make life easier and more efficient has since soured. 

Amanda Daering, a Florida-based staffing strategist, said the dawn of artificial intelligence-driven software programs has tempted executives to implement such platforms more broadly. “This was rolled out in a time in which people are feeling particularly cautious,” she said. “AI is moving really quickly. What does that mean for me? What does that mean for my job?”

Daering warns that the cost savings for employers may come with unintended trade-offs: She compared BidShift to “cog work,” where workers feel replaceable, similar to what customer service reps have experienced with offshoring.

Just before the BidShift news spread, author and activist Cory Doctorow, a guest on comedian Jon Stewart’s podcast, criticized the use of different platforms that also invite nurses to bid for shifts. Gig nursing apps offer nurses single shifts at participating facilities; BidShift, on the other hand, is intended only to facilitate shift coverage for staff nurses.

Doctorow cited findings claiming some gig nursing platforms use personal data, like nurses’ credit card debt, to offer lower hourly rates. 

“I am truly sorry for the confusion and angst this has caused.” 

 Min Lee, UNC Medical Center’s president

“It’s a desperation premium,” he said in a clip that garnered 2.2 million views on TikTok.

It’s unclear whether gig nursing platforms are actually mining nurses’ data to pay them less. A representative of ShiftKey, one of the largest such platforms, told The Assemblyit doesn’t use data in this way. 

A representative of symplr, the Texas-based software firm that owns BidShift, said the firm doesn’t and has never had access to the personal financial data of its client’s employees.

Researchers who have studied other platforms, like ride-sharing, have long warned of the potential for algorithmic wage discrimination. Some scholars assert that companies use large personalized datasets purchased by third parties that can include their employees’ shopping habits, credit reports, and more to determine how much they are paid.

And in recent months, federal regulators have taken notice of variable pricing schemes that charge customers different prices for hotel rooms or plane tickets based on their personal data. 

While UNC quickly walked back from BidShift, the ordeal has left some still on edge. 

‘Moral Distress’

While BidShift has been around for decades, its use in North Carolina appears relatively rare.

Bonnie Davis Meadows, president of the North Carolina Nurses Association, hasn’t encountered BidShift or other similar platforms like ShiftKey. As far as Meadows knows, most staffing decisions are still made the old-fashioned way—by humans. And that has generally worked.

“The only time it’s hard is when you are in the thick of it,” she said. 

But nursing is an incredibly difficult job, and even before the pandemic, Meadows said, nurses were overburdened. Then COVID-19 triggered an exodus of skilled nursing labor, with many choosing early retirement over increasingly stressful work conditions. That put more work on the nurses who stayed.

A recent policy paper in the North Carolina Medical Journal highlighted how low staffing can, in turn, limit the level of care nurses can offer their patients, putting them in a state of “moral distress.”

“At some point, you get so beaten down with the moral injury of knowing you’re being asked to do more than is humanly possible that you change professions,” said Hannah Drummond, National Nurses United’s chief nursing representative at Mission Hospital in Asheville. “I know people who left to go work in breweries and in food service.”

A survey of health care employers in North Carolina found that close to half of their registered nurses quit in 2024 and that one in eight open positions remained unfilled. If that trend continues, researchers estimate the state will face a deficit of 12,500 registered nurses by 2033. 

Stakeholders often describe the labor mismatch as a “shortage.” But Drummond said that framing is misleading. There’s a shortage of good nursing jobs, she said–not a shortage of good nurses.

“The hospital industry has manufactured this shortage,” she said. “That’s one less body that you have to pay to be on the unit.”

Federal data show a statewide surplus of people qualified to work as nurses. As of May, more than 111,100 registered nurses were employed in North Carolina, earning a median annual wage of $84,350. About 170,000 nurses have an active license, which must be renewed every two years. That means about 59,000 are effectively sitting on the sidelines. 

“Everyone says, ‘Oh, they’re just waiting to come back,’” said Matthew Kuhn, a Pinehurst-based traveling nurse practitioner. “That’s not the case. I think that many of these folks are burnt out.”

Since the pandemic, hospitals have tried to reduce their reliance on travel nurses. But for that to happen, executives need to hire—and retain—more full-time nurses. 

“It feels like a spiral,” Kuhn said. 

A Scarce Resource

Whether the price of a scarce resource is going up or down, auctions can be efficient tools for distributing it, said Alfredo Romero, chair of the Department of Economics at North Carolina A&T State University.

In the case of BidShift, the hard-to-fill shifts—rather than a nurse’s labor—are treated as the scarce resource.

“Efficiency is not a bad thing,” Romero said. “But from the fairness point of view, it might be, depending on how the rules of the game were set.”

“Everyone says, ‘Oh, they’re just waiting to come back. That’s not the case. I think that many of these folks are burnt out.”

Matthew Kuhn, traveling nurse practitioner

For nurses who have been working under a traditional staffing model, changing the system can prompt distrust, Romero said. “If I don’t know how these shifts are being allocated, then the outcome is unfair.”

Online, incensed commenters frequently suggested the UNC nurses should unionize. But as a state-owned health system, UNC Health’s nurses in Chapel Hill are considered state employees who aren’t allowed to bargain or collectively negotiate the terms of their employment.  And yet, they managed to effectively shut down UNC’s plan.

“Even without the ability of workers to organize, they were still able to create enough social backlash,” Romero said. 

‘The Same or Higher’

After the online dustup, UNC Health leaders introduced a different program using symplr’s platform that it calls Carolina Premium Shifts, according to internal materials The Assembly obtained. Under the system rolled out August 7, nurses don’t bid against each other, and the advertised price for unfilled shifts doesn’t drop as demand rises. It hasn’t announced the change publicly.

According to the internal memo, pay for these rebranded extra shifts is “the same or higher” than the rates offered through previous systems. Depending on a nurse’s experience level, it amounts to a premium of roughly $14 an hour.

UNC Health declined to make someone available for an interview or to address what prompted the change, but Wolf, the system spokesperson, sent a statement: “UNC Health strives to be a great place to work for all our teammates. Any new policies or initiatives are done to support our teammates and ensure we remain competitive.”

A Chapel Hill charge nurse, who also requested anonymity to avoid retaliation, said her colleagues readily scooped up shifts as soon as they were posted under the new system. “They were picking them up on the spot,” she said. 

Many critics worried that BidShift could undermine nurses’ base pay—not just at UNC, but everywhere. If hospitals more widely embrace reverse auctions to award extra shifts, they fear it could eventually drive wages down, since priority goes to the lowest bidder. 

The charge nurse feels those anxieties are overblown. Still, she was grateful the ordeal prompted UNC to take her team’s concerns seriously. 

“We felt like they smoothed it over,” she said.

 

u/IdealistNC — 4 days ago
▲ 1.9k r/ncpolitics+9 crossposts

Bidshift: Who’s really to blame the nurses who bid lower, or the hospital that created the bidding system?

UNC Hospitals is changing how premium shifts are assigned. Instead of offering a set bonus, nurses can request an open shift at the pay rate they want. If the shift stays open, other eligible staff can request it for a lower premium rate. In most cases, the lowest bid gets the shift, although managers can still choose someone else based on the unit’s needs or the nurse’s skills and experience. UNC says the goal is to make staffing more consistent across the health system, but the change has sparked debate among nurses because it encourages bidding against each other for extra shifts.

u/IdealistNC — 2 months ago
▲ 148 r/ncpolitics+6 crossposts

nc healthcare system: mutually benefits insurers and massive hospital systems at the expense of patients and taxpayers?

see below news articles. the most recent news is BS: how state workers's premiums are rising 5% but they will "save $" by "incentivizing" them to use UNC Health. UNC Health is basically a monopoly with excessive costs that include double-billing (charging exorbitant hospital fees on top of provider fees) and has a history of lack of transparency (in 2018, NC’s treasurer requested provider contracts from UNC Health, UNC Health sent back a document containing ~200 pages of almost entirely blacked-out, redacted pages.)

~~~
Premiums to rise 5% for State Health Plan; state workers to be pushed to UNC for care. (Jul 2026)
https://www.wral.com/news/nccapitol/north-carolina-state-health-plan-vote-on-premium-increase-preferred-providers-july-2026/

The health care didn’t change. The office hasn’t moved. Why is UNC now charging more (March 2023)
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article272637989.html

When your doctor’s visit comes with a hospital fee — but no hospital. As hospitals buy up medical offices and specialty clinics, hospital facility fees for routine doctor’s visits catch patients off guard (September 2024)
https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2024/09/23/hospital-facility-fees-but-no-hospital/

Stop the facility-fee shakedown (May 2026)
https://www.carolinajournal.com/opinion/stop-the-facility-fee-shakedown/

North Carolina Hospitals Charge Families Huge Price Markups for Common Shoppable Services, Hide Prices from Patients
https://www.shpnc.gov/what-the-health/nc-hospital-price-transparency-report

Gene Woods, CEO of Atrium Health’s parent company, gets a 49% pay boost, to $25.8 million. Woods’ compensation eclipses what other major North Carolina health-system CEOs earn. (November 2025)
https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2025/11/28/gene-woods-ceo-atrium-advocate-49-perecnt-pay-boost/

HOSPITAL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. A Decade of Growing Wage Inequity Across Nonprofit Hospitals
https://www.shpnc.gov/nonprofit-hospital-executive-pay-report/download?attachment

Unanimous NC Senate backs UNC Health changes, despite 'monopolistic' concerns. The UNC Health bill also says new hires won't be part of the state retirement system, and it would let the system shift all employees onto a new health plan. (May 2023)
https://www.wral.com/archive/20838335/

UNC Health Care’s response to a public records request left NC’s treasurer in the dark (September 2018)
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article217608650.html

Treasurer frustrated by lack of transparency from UNC Health Care. (August 2018)
https://www.carolinajournal.com/treasurer-frustrated-by-lack-of-transparency-from-unc-health-care/

u/IdealistNC — 3 months ago
▲ 103 r/carrboro+4 crossposts

Stein creates bipartisan healthcare affordability commission

link to article and other related articles below.

thoughts? although it's encouraging to see governor Stein (D) and treasurer Briner (R) teaming up, I'm skeptical any real change will be made, especially anytime soon. the executive order specifically tasks the commission with "promoting competition." if they are serious about that mandate, they have to address the massive elephant in the room: the unchecked power of healthcare monopolies like UNC Health and Duke Health, especially here in the Triangle.

If this commission wants to deliver actual relief to NC folks, their top targets should be:

  1. breaking up hospital monopolies like UNC Health and Duke Healthtrue affordability comes from free-market competition, not consolidated corporate healthcare. right now, giant systems use their immense leverage to swallow up independent practices, destroying choices for North Carolinians and running small-business doctors out of the market. 
  2. outlawing (like some other states have) their "double-billing" practice which tacks on an exorbitant hospital/facility fees on top of the doctor's provider fee.
  3. reining in runaway executive compensation. it’s impossible to take "affordability" claims seriously when nonprofit and state-affiliated health systems are paying their CEOs millions of dollars a year.

~~~

Stein creates bipartisan healthcare affordability commission
https://www.carolinajournal.com/stein-creates-bipartisan-healthcare-affordability-commission/

The health care didn’t change. The office hasn’t moved. Why is UNC now charging more
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article272637989.html

When your doctor’s visit comes with a hospital fee — but no hospital. As hospitals buy up medical offices and specialty clinics, hospital facility fees for routine doctor’s visits catch patients off guard
https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2024/09/23/hospital-facility-fees-but-no-hospital/

North Carolina Hospitals Charge Families Huge Price Markups for Common Shoppable Services, Hide Prices from Patients
https://www.shpnc.gov/what-the-health/nc-hospital-price-transparency-report

Gene Woods, CEO of Atrium Health’s parent company, gets a 49% pay boost, to $25.8 million. Woods’ compensation eclipses what other major North Carolina health-system CEOs earn.
https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2025/11/28/gene-woods-ceo-atrium-advocate-49-perecnt-pay-boost/

HOSPITAL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. A Decade of Growing Wage Inequity Across Nonprofit Hospitals
https://www.shpnc.gov/nonprofit-hospital-executive-pay-report/download?attachment

Unanimous NC Senate backs UNC Health changes, despite 'monopolistic' concerns. The UNC Health bill also says new hires won't be part of the state retirement system, and it would let the system shift all employees onto a new health plan.
https://www.wral.com/archive/20838335/

u/IdealistNC — 3 months ago
▲ 721 r/ncpolitics+4 crossposts

Where is our tax $ going? To provide handouts to the wealthy. New data shows NC private school vouchers are turning into a handout for the wealthy while local schools pay the price, "New data confirms NC school voucher expansion disproportionately benefits wealthy private school families"

link to full article and some snippets further below. Because the state lifted the income caps, taxpayers are now writing checks to families who never spent a single day in public school and were already comfortably paying private tuition.

~~~

https://www.ncjustice.org/new-data-confirms-nc-school-voucher-expansion-disproportionately-benefits-wealthy-private-school-families/

"The startling takeaway is this: a whopping 87 percent of new school vouchers in 24-25 went to families who have never attended a public school.

The data confirms voucher opponents’ predictions of who would benefit from 2023 legislation eliminating income caps and prior public school enrollment requirements. By making the program “universal,” the General Assembly always intended the voucher program to benefit disproportionately wealthy families who had already enrolled their children in private schools. For context, the median household with a child in private school earns nearly double the typical household in North Carolina.

This new data places North Carolina’s program near the top of state voucher programs when it comes to paying private school families to do something they were already doing."

u/IdealistNC — 3 months ago
▲ 249 r/TrueCarolina+5 crossposts

10 Reasons NC’s Income Tax Cap Amendment Is A Bad Deal For The State’s Future

Link to full article, and other articles, further below.

Thoughts? Considering NC is a red state, I shouldn't be surprised how it shits on its people.

The income tax cap amendment is a smokescreen and political distraction designed to hide the reality: North Carolina lawmakers are rigging the system for the ultra-wealthy and corporations (*corporations who already enjoy one of the lowest tax rates in America*) while completely abandoning their responsibility to the people.

*North Carolina has the one of the lowest corporate income tax rates in the nation (currently at 2.5%) and is scheduled to eliminate it entirely by 2030*

While NC residents deal with one of the highest costs of health care, toxic drinking water, starved public schools, and stagnant minimum wage ($7.25/hr which hasn't increased since 2009) the legislature's priority is to pass a constitutional amendment that legally prevents the state from ever properly funding a fix. They are using the promise of "low taxes" to mask a systematic, permanent betrayal of the public's health and future.

~~~

10 Reasons NC’s Income Tax Cap Amendment Is A Bad Deal For The State’s Future

https://ncbudget.org/10-reasons-ncs-income-tax-cap-amendment-is-a-bad-deal-for-the-states-future/

History of PFAS Contamination in North Carolina

https://www.nrdc.org/media/history-pfas-contamination-north-carolina

NC Attorney General Jackson on Chemours, EPA agreement: 'This is an insult' to eastern NC

https://www.wunc.org/environment/2026-06-24/nc-attorney-general-jackson-chemours-epa-agreement

North Carolina has most expensive health care in the country, report says:

https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2024/07/02/nc-highest-health-care-costs-nation/74280249007/

How the State Starved Our Schools

https://triangleblogblog.com/2026/03/24/how-the-state-starved-our-schools/

Repealing North Carolina’s Corporate Tax is an Even Worse Idea Than You Think

https://itep.org/repealing-north-carolinas-corporate-tax-even-worse-idea/

Minimum wages are increasing in nearly half the states this year

Voters in several states, including deeply red ones, chose to make significant boosts this year. NC is not on the list
https://ncnewsline.com/2025/01/13/minimum-wages-are-increasing-in-nearly-half-the-states-this-year/

u/IdealistNC — 4 months ago
▲ 195 r/chapelhill+3 crossposts

State AG sues company over ‘black water’ near an East Durham elementary school

The state says black water and toxic chemicals have been found at the site of Brenntag Mid-South, Inc. in East Durham. The company failed to clean up the pollution, prompting legal action.

The state is suing a chemical distribution company it says is illegally dumping pollutants from its East Durham facility into local waterways. N.C. Attorney General Jeff Jackson and the N.C. Department of Justice, representing the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality, filed a lawsuit Tuesday against Brenntag Mid-South Inc., a distributor of industrial chemicals and ingredients.

State officials are demanding that the company, which has a facility at 2000 E. Pettigrew St., immediately contain the alleged contamination and submit a cleanup plan within 30 days. In November, Brenntag was cited by state officials for failing to clean up leaking barrels on the property. According to the lawsuit, recent testing showed the chemicals enter a stream that runs behind Burton Magnet Elementary School, through Burton Park, and feeds into Third Fork Creek and Jordan Lake, the drinking water supply for over a million people. According to the lawsuit, the environmental investigation began last April following an anonymous complaint alleging chemical leaks, dumping and poor housekeeping at the Brenntag site. When DEQ inspectors visited the facility, they found leaking storage drums and tanks, and noted that the site’s groundwater remediation system was turned off. In dry weather conditions, state investigators saw “black water” pooling at a stormwater outfall and flowing into the creek. The city posted a notice prohibiting visitors at Burton Park from wading or playing in the creek. The park joins a list of contaminated parks in the city. Currently, there are five parks in Durham closed due to lead contamination.

Demand for accountability Aidil Ortiz, a community organizer in Old East Durham, lives near the Brenntag facility. For months, she and other residents have been trying to raise awareness and hold Brenntag accountable. “I want to see our city made whole for all the money they’ve ever spent trying to chase the faces of this issue,” she said. “When everyday residents in Durham break rules, we get lights shut of, water shut off, we get fees and fines, liens on our home. When multi-national companies mess up, they get decades to figure it out.” Ortiz said the company has not given neighbors any communication about clean-up plans. Most neighbors have only heard about the problem from residents who attended monthly city Environmental Affairs Board meetings and shared information with others. “The site has been used for many things,” she said. “Once you assume ownership of a property, you’re responsible. I don’t get out of that responsibility and get to put my hands in the air and be innocent.”

‘Severe’ environmental damage Water testing by the state Division of Water Resources confirmed severe environmental destruction. Samples taken downstream revealed a drop in dissolved oxygen levels below the state’s legal standard of 4.0 mg/L, creating conditions hazardous to aquatic life, the lawsuit reads. In February, groundwater assessments found volatile compounds like acetone and ethanol, a human carcinogen, far exceeding state groundwater standards, according to the lawsuit. Officials said Brenntag has had multiple chances to self-correct before the state escalated the matter to the courts. The November violation demanded a corrective action plan, but as of Monday, the company had failed to stop the discharges. “Brenntag has had plenty of time and opportunity to clean up its act so that our water doesn’t get contaminated,” Jackson said in a statement. “It hasn’t.” The News & Observer contacted Brenntag for a comment Wednesday but did not hear back. The lawsuit asks Durham County Superior Court to force the company to halt the illegal discharges, implement containment measures and absorb the costs of the action.

newsobserver.com
u/IdealistNC — 4 months ago
▲ 219 r/FayettevilleNC+5 crossposts

NC Attorney General Jackson on Chemours, EPA agreement: 'This is an insult' to eastern NC

A proposed federal consent decree between Chemours and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency likely fails to provide further protections to communities downstream of the chemical company's Fayetteville Works plant, N.C. Attorney General Jeff Jackson said in an interview with Wednesday.

"This is an insult to the people of eastern North Carolina. It does practically nothing for the state. It sends a message that the EPA doesn't really care about groundwater contamination," Jackson, a Democrat, told the N.C. Newsroom.

"As Attorney General, we're going to do everything we can to actually make sure that Chemours is held responsible for the remarkable and extensive groundwater contamination that they allowed to occur in our state."

The consent decree, filed Tuesday, requires Chemours to conduct additional monitoring at the Fayetteville Works facility from which the company and its predecessors are alleged to have illegally discharged so-called forever chemicals into the Cape Fear River.

The agreement covers alleged releases of a number of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, which are commonly known as forever chemicals because their chemical makeup allows them to persist in nature. Scientists have linked the chemicals to a number of adverse health impacts, including certain cancers.

Chemours employees in 2017 told North Carolina officials that they and employees at DuPont, which owned Fayetteville Works before spinning Chemours off, discharged forever chemicals into the Cape Fear River beginning as early as 1980.

Much of the $450 million agreement covers facilities in other states, including $280 million to supply drinking water near the New Jersey and West Virginia facilities and $60 million to control discharges and emissions at Washington Works in West Virginia. 

The decree would also mandate that Chemours spend $90 million over the next 15 years to control PFAS releases at the three plants, including Fayetteville Works. Part of that, however, is that Chemours can receive up to $36 million in credits if state level regulators such as the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality require that the company install pollution controls to reduce PFAS emissions or discharges. 

The agreement, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, is not yet final and is open to public comment for the next 30 days. The proposal also covers alleged releases at plants now belonging to Chemours at Washington Works in Parkersburg, West Virginia, and Chambers Works in Deepwater, New Jersey.

As part of the agreement, Chemours would need to hire an independent engineer to evaluate the processes involving GenX, create a flow chart of Chemours' operations and identify any potential release points. The engineer would also be tasked with quantifying the potential release of GenX over a calendar year. 

"Fayetteville Works is required to capture 99.5% of GenX emissions, including HFPO-DA byproduct emissions. Given the significant investment made in emissions control technologies at Fayetteville Works over the past decade, the site is well suited to meet this requirement," Jess Loizeaux, a Chemours spokeswoman, wrote in a statement.

Under the proposed agreement, Chemours will also pay a civil penalty of $22.5 million. 

Chemours' market cap is about $3 billion.

"Through this commitment, Chemours will better control PFAS at its plants, allowing the company to continue its manufacturing operations while protecting communities in North Carolina, West Virginia, and New Jersey from PFAS exposure. This agreement ensures that the company will manufacture these critical materials in a responsible manner," Adam Gustafson, the U.S. Department of Justice's principal deputy assistant attorney general for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, said in a statement.

North Carolina's Department of Justice was not party to the consent decree, Jackson said, even though it "absolutely" would have wanted to be.

"This is a major issue to our state. We wanted U.S. DOJ and EPA to hold Chemours' feet to the fire because that's what the state deserves. They decided to completely stand down here, abdicate," Jackson said.

Mary Helen Moore

/

NC Newsroom 

Attorney General Jeff Jackson speaks during a Council of State meeting, Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025, in Raleigh, N.C.

NC consent decree already in place

Those investments were largely mandated under a still-in-effect consent decree the chemical manufacturer reached with the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality and environmental watchdog Cape Fear River Watch in February 2019.

That agreement has resulted in Chemours taking a number of measures to significantly reduce forever chemical discharges and emissions, including the installation of a thermal oxidizer that captures and destroys PFAS, resulting in a 99% reduction in GenX emissions. It also led to Chemours' construction of a 1.5-mile long barrier wall and installation of water treatment system meant to capture and treat 99% of contaminated groundwater underneath the facility. 

"When crafting the settlement agreement, Chemours’ existing Consent Order with NC DEQ was taken into account, along with the work that has already been done to significantly reduce PFAS emissions from Fayetteville Works," Loizeaux wrote.

The EPA agreement focuses too narrowly on GenX, said Jean Zhuang, a senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, particularly when research indicates that Chemours is continuing to release many other short-chain PFAS into the environment.

"It really reveals that this settlement is really acting as a shield for the company and is there to try to protect it from liability for all of the harm it's caused," Zhuang said.

Jackson, the N.C. attorney general, said his team is still working through the agreement but believes that it does little to actually protect communities in North Carolina. 

If North Carolina receives a third of the discretionary spending that can be split among the three plants, Jackson said, that would be $30 million over 15 years, or $2 million annually. By comparison, Chemours officials have said the thermal oxidizer at Fayetteville Works cost somewhere around $100 million when it was built nearly a decade ago.

"Even if there is a little bit of money here, it doesn't actually go to the State of North Carolina. The State of North Carolina isn't in the driver's seat on determining how it should be spent to remedy the groundwater contamination. The terms of this are totally favorable to Chemours," Jackson said.

wunc.org
u/IdealistNC — 4 months ago
▲ 109 r/carrboro+3 crossposts

Nonprofit hospital CEOs would face pay limits under bill advancing in NC Senate

this part from the article is the clincher, "Under the bill, a nonprofit hospital’s CEO could make up to $14 million if the company’s lowest-paid employee made $35,000 per year."

https://www.wral.com/news/nccapitol/lawmakers-propose-pay-limits-for-nc-non-profit-hospital-ceos-atrium-wakemed-june-2026/

Nonprofit hospital CEOs would face pay limits under bill advancing in NC Senate

Senate Bill 978, introduced as a merger between WakeMed and Atrium Health was being formulated, would cap compensation for chief executives of nonprofit hospitals at 400 times the wage of the lowest-paid employee. 

Posted 6:38 PM Jun 11, 2026  Updated 9:06 PM Jun 11, 2026

North Carolina lawmakers are zeroing in on executive pay at the state’s nonprofit hospitals — a proposal that could cause at least one healthcare executive to take a massive pay cut. 

Senate Bill 978, which advanced out of the Senate Health Care Committee Thursday, would cap compensation for chief executives of nonprofit hospitals at 400 times that of the lowest-paid worker. 

The bill was introduced in late April, as a proposed merger between WakeMed and Atrium Health was being formulated, and made public in early May. The deal has drawn scrutiny and calls for more oversight from state and local officials, including several who warn it could raise the cost of care for some patients. 

u/IdealistNC — 4 months ago