
storybloq's approach to using fable efficiently: it plans and reviews, opus implements in parallel
A couple of months ago I posted about storybloq, a session manager for Claude Code that I built. It keeps your project state (tickets, issues, handovers, notes, lessons) as plain files in a .story/ folder in your repo, so a new session picks up where the last one left off instead of starting from zero.
Using Fable to write out every implementation is a waste.
Fable should do to the thinking: the plan, the spec, and the review.
So in Storybloq's orchestration you can do that.
Fable plans the work, turns each backlog item into a full spec, and holds the review gates, then hands the implementation to a fleet opus agents running in parallel.
You get fable's judgment on every decision without paying fable rates to type out the code.
That is the core of what shipped today, orchestration. You point it at your backlog and fable drives the opus agents through it, with a plan review before any code is written and a review of the actual diff before it ships.
Two other things make this hold up on a real project.
Federation, for multi-repo setups.
If your app is more than one repo (backend, client, a shared package), storybloq reads across all of them: what is blocked on what, what to work on next across the whole system instead of one repo at a time.
If you work across repos I really recommend it. It is the change I use most.
Team mode.
Several people and their agents can share one .story/ backlog through git without clobbering each other. Concurrent edits to the same file merge field by field instead of leaving conflict markers, and it tracks who is working what so two agents do not grab the same item.
Put together: set up a multi-repo backlog in storybloq, break down your project into tickets and phases in a roadmap, then let fable drive opus agents through the items in parallel, gated on the plan and the diff.
Free to try, source-available on npm
npm install -g u/storybloq/storybloq.
Built with Claude Code.