
Combat-focused characters when they roll bad
I never thought I would play as worf in a non Star Trek game

I never thought I would play as worf in a non Star Trek game
>Happy to be playing werewolf
>Attack PenteX agent with glee
>He explodes when I kill him
>Take 7 agg damage
>Can't soak it because I am metis in crinos
>Instantly die to lack of rage
10/10 would get overconfident in WtA20th again
You can tell Stig is Garou because he believes he's invincible, creates a situation that hurts him, and then frenzies about it. (Deciding to "honorably" duel what he thought was a harmless human only to get a silver cut and immediately frenzy)
Very Garou coded, bravo vince
It has taken several test flights (And a brave sacrifice by Jebediah Kermin) but I finally managed to have a crew do a fly-by of the Mun and make it back home safe. Very proud (I am doing a science sandbox as my first go at KSP)
I almost feel bad for the kindred of Fairbanks in my upcoming mage game
With special guest: The Garou Nation
I know that having 1 dot in any sphere is theoretically not bad at all and lets you percieve a lot, but does it really? If you only have 1 arete for instance, then you are only rolling a single d10 to pull off the amazing feat of perception assuming you dont incur extra paradox
Why would you attempt to use any spheres outside of overly long rituals when your paradigm severely limits their use, failure can kill you, and success just gives you information you could have gained from making a normal skill test?
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
Moral ambiguity? In World of Darkness? Nonsense, we should just larp as crusaders and deus vult