The Shared History of Iran and Azerbaijan
One thing that has always surprised me:
The Safavids united the Turkoman tribes around them, and large numbers of Turkic tribes from Anatolia rallied to their cause. As long as they ruled, they remained a constant challenge to the Ottomans, partly because many Anatolian Turkic tribes were inclined toward Alevism.
Nader Shah emphasized his Turkic roots, reportedly treated the Mughal emperor favorably because of their shared Turkic background, and even proposed peace to the Ottomans by saying, “We are all Turkmans.” Some contemporary sources also describe him expressing contempt for the Persian population of cities like Kashan and Isfahan.
The Qajars openly identified with their Turkic origins. Agha Mohammad Khan spoke of his Turkic ancestry, and numerous European diplomats noted that the Qajar elite preferred speaking their own language—the Turkic language they had inherited from their ancestors.
So what I find puzzling is that many Persian nationalists and pan-Iranists today still celebrate these dynasties as symbols of Persian history.
These rulers often elevated Turkic elites, identified themselves as Turkic, and in some cases looked down on Persian urban populations. Persian poets of the time even wrote verses lamenting that the “barbarian Qajars” were coming to slaughter them. Yet today they’re presented as great Persian dynasties.
What would Cyrus the Great have thought?
If anything, leave these Turkic dynasties to us.
They were our ancestors, not yours.