u/PlaneAttention9814

I want to preface this by saying I'm currently questioning, I'm not exactly sure what's true and what's not, this sort of topic though has been on my mind for several years

I have seen a lot of Hell NDE (Near Death Experience) videos, and I came across this compilation recently which basically cuts up several different experiences and puts them together, which goes to show how extremely similar they are

For example, what's consistently reported is suddenly falling down extremely fast and landing in Hell, the smell, demons with yellow eyes in particular, the idea of just knowing where you are and why others are there, and even the idea that it felt so real and the insistence of how real it felt

There's even an explanation for why other people experience different NDEs, with one person saying there's demons who deceive people into thinking it's peaceful until they reveal the person is in Hell (this could explain any NDEs where people believe they meet any other gods)

The sheer amount of these stories, being extremely similar, and the fact a lot of these people seem sincere in the way they tell the stories (some even crying), it definitely could seem like they genuinely experienced something very real

I've even seen it explained (not in the video though) that the reason that demons are torturing and not being tortured is because the final judgement hasn't come, and that when it does, then the demons will be tortured too

This was the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhuHfebMOJ4

Recently had come across a substack of this guy Ethan Muse, guess he's some sort of Catholic apologist that tries to prove the religion using argumentation based around "miracle"

To clarify, I'm not Chrisrian, and neither am I an atheist, but I do know atheism and skepticism go hand in hand, and so was just curious if people had gone through this man's arguments before and what they thought of them (I searched the man's name up before but most of what I came across was just Catholic posts about the guy)

I'm specifically curious how people view his work on the "Miracle of Fatima", which he has gone in-depth to defend (even trying to posit an argument that there was no failed prophecy because it was actually conditional, and going into extreme detail to try and argue that)