Conspiracy theory: they gave us a FM paper
No way this was a pure maths paper bro I refuse to believe it
No way this was a pure maths paper bro I refuse to believe it
Hello,
I am currently working on a Discord bot named Ralph for a game project. Right now, I'm mainly focusing on a Murder Mystery game.
I'm building off some assets from an old project, but this version will be high quality, complete with custom voice-overs, rich story arcs, and unique roles.
However, I'm turning to you, the community: what else would you like to see from a game bot on Discord?
Hello,
I am currently working on a Discord bot named Ralph for a game project. Right now, I'm mainly focusing on a Murder Mystery game.
I'm building off some assets from an old project, but this version will be high quality, complete with custom voice-overs, rich story arcs, and unique roles.
However, I'm turning to you, the community: what else would you like to see from a game bot on Discord?
Thanks!
Hi, I am from Karachi.
I worked at this company that I will keep anonymous for about four months. During this time, I asked to go on three different leaves. Please note that the contract they made me sign only asked compensation for unauthorised leaves, not authorised. All my leaves were authorised by HR. After my intern period of four months was up, I was supposed to receive stipend. However, one of the heads of the company fired me the day I was supposed to get my stipend (He is the Co CEO). They want me to compensate for a whole entire month because of the leaves (again, not mentioned in their contract or by them anywhere and is also more than the number of days leave I took). Since, I said no, they fired me for “poor quality of work” (work they showed no objection to before). They are not paying me. I want to go public with this story since the involved is an educational platform however, they have already threatened legal action. (They are a relatively small company, 5-6 actual employees). The reason I want to go public is to put some pressure on them to release my payments. I was wondering if any good legal consulting firms in Karachi would be willing to provide me with legal advice.
Dear everyone,
I am writing on behalf of thousands of A-Level students in Pakistan and around the world who have been affected by Cambridge International's handling of the 2026 examination series.
I will not be discussing every reported paper leak. Instead, I want to highlight a few of the most significant incidents and explain why so many students have lost confidence in the integrity of this examination session.
On 29 April 2026, Cambridge conducted 9709/12 (Mathematics Paper 1, Variant 2). More than 12 hours before the examination, the entire paper was already circulating online and was accessible to anyone. A breach of this magnitude undermines the fundamental principle of a fair examination.
The following day, the Business Studies examination was also leaked. Cambridge has not acknowledged this leak despite evidence of the paper circulating online. In the days that followed, Computer Science Paper 1 and Mathematics Paper 5 (Statistics) were also compromised. Several additional papers were reportedly leaked during the same examination series.
Although approximately twelve papers were reported as leaked, Cambridge officially acknowledged only three: Computer Science Paper 1, Mathematics Paper 1 (Variant 2), and Mathematics Paper 5 (Statistics).
Cambridge's response varied significantly between subjects.
For Computer Science Paper 1, candidates received an assessed mark based on their performance in Paper 2. For Mathematics Paper 1, Cambridge organised a retake. For Mathematics Paper 5, Cambridge initially announced that candidates would receive an assessed mark based on their performance in Paper 1. Students were also given the option to withdraw from the examination.
Students made life-changing decisions based on that announcement.
Many withdrew because Statistics was one of their strongest papers and they did not want it replaced by an assessed mark. Others walked out of the examination altogether. By that stage, students had already witnessed leaks affecting Mathematics, Business Studies, and Computer Science. After weeks of uncertainty, confidence in the examination process had been severely damaged.
Cambridge also announced that candidates receiving assessed marks would be eligible for a free retake. Students relied on those assurances when deciding whether to sit or withdraw from examinations.
Cambridge has since reversed its position and announced that Mathematics Paper 5 will be marked normally, despite previously acknowledging that the paper had been compromised.
This decision carries significant consequences.
Cambridge awards grades using grade thresholds, which are determined by the overall performance of candidates. If a compromised paper is graded in the usual way, candidates who had prior access to the questions could artificially increase overall performance and raise grade thresholds. Honest candidates would then be competing against results influenced by an examination whose integrity had already been compromised.
Students who withdrew after Cambridge's original announcement also face serious disadvantages. Their decisions were based on official guidance that was later changed, leaving many without the outcome they reasonably expected when they made those choices.
Fairness, consistency, and transparency are the foundations of every examination system. Students dedicate years of hard work, invest substantial financial resources, and build their university applications around the expectation that examinations will be conducted securely, and that official decisions will remain consistent.
When examination papers repeatedly leak, when responses differ from subject to subject, and when official policies change after students have already made irreversible decisions, confidence in the examination process is inevitably damaged.
Thousands of students now face uncertainty through no fault of their own. They deserve clear explanations, consistent decision-making, and outcomes that reflect the principles Cambridge expects students themselves to uphold.
If you believe examinations should be secure, fair, and credible, please help raise awareness of the issues surrounding the 2026 A-Level examination series. Every student deserves an assessment process they can trust.
I cannot link the article, unfortunately.
From the article:
>Multiple paddock sources have suggested that McLaren and Max Verstappen are in the closing stages of a lengthy negotiation for the Dutch driver to swap from Red Bull, despite the apparent shutdown of the rumours by CEO Zak Brown.
>Verstappen’s rear wing failure at Silverstone on Sunday, and consequent lack of points scoring, means that it is no longer mathematically possible for him to be in the top two positions in the Drivers’ Championship by the summer break.
>It is widely believed that Verstappen needs to be in the top two positions in order for him not to be able to activate his escape clause, which would allow him the freedom to explore options elsewhere on the grid despite his existing contract that is in place until the conclusion of the F1 2028 season.
>In June, Verstappen travelled to Red Bull’s headquarters in Austria to hold talks with the senior shareholders of the company, including Mark Mateschitz from the Austrian minority, and Chalerm Yoovidhya from the majority Thai side – Yoovidhya having made a rare trip from Dubai in order to engage with Verstappen as Red Bull sought reassurances from him that he will remain at the team in 2027.
>PlanetF1 understands that Red Bull was seeking to buy Verstappen out of his escape clause, to write out the option from his arrangement, but the Dutch driver refused this.
>As reported by Dutch publication De Limburger, and corroborated by PlanetF1, this refusal is said to have angered Red Bull as its star driver keeps them dangling on commitment.
>It’s understood that the situation has devolved to the point that an angered Mateschitz has indicated a desire to sever ties, although this stance is not believed to be shared by CEO Oliver Mintzlaff, who is eager to retain Verstappen until 2030.
>A sticking point in the matter is believed to be on the topic of loyalty: Red Bull feeling it has done enough to earn greater loyalty from Verstappen, given the freedom and salary he has been afforded during his decade with the senior team, while his camp is said to have lost faith in the team despite the changes made in upper management last year following the dismissal of former team principal and CEO Christian Horner.
A switch to Mercedes now appears off the table, with the Brackley-based squad set to stick with an unchanged line-up of George Russell and Kimi Antonelli, but a rumour that refuses to go away is that of a switch to Mclaren, which was first reported by British publications last month, despite insistence last week from CEO Zak Brown that both Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri’s names are “engraved” on their seats.
>At Silverstone, PlanetF1 asked Brown what could tempt Verstappen about the McLaren team, and what his squad might have that Red Bull cannot give him.
>“I haven’t really thought about that because I’ve got two drivers in the seats,” Brown said.
>“So, what I couldn’t offer him was a seat in my race car. But I think McLaren’s an awesome team. So is Red Bull, and so is Alpine, and so is Ferrari. The Formula 1 teams are amazing.
>“I think we’ve got a unique environment, but as do all race teams. But we’ve got a great race team that’s had a lot of success, and I think it’s a good place to work, whether you’re a racing driver or a team principal or a mechanic, or whatever you may be at Team McLaren.”
>The current understanding is that it’s Oscar Piastri’s seat that is the one in question, with Lando Norris’s seat secure as the reigning F1 World Champion. Piastri finished third in last season’s title charge, with his bid faltering in the final third of the season after having been in a commanding lead after the Dutch Grand Prix.
>Commenting on the rumours himself last weekend, Piastri said, “For me, it doesn’t mean much. Obviously Max is the talent he is, and looking around. I’m very happy with where I am.
>“I’ve been told multiple times that the team are happy with me and I trust them. So, for me, it doesn’t really mean much. A contract is in place as well. I’m just trying to build on the success I’ve had.”
>But, while that may have been the case at the time, Piastri’s slipping to sixth place in the Drivers’ Championship after Silverstone is said to make him vulnerable to a contractual option on McLaren’s side, and Verstappen’s discussions with McLaren regarding the seat currently occupied by the Australian are said to have advanced significantly – to the point where prominent sources have suggested a deal, believed to initially be for three years, is “imminent”.
>Indeed, some sources even suggested that Red Bull was primed from its side to make a driver announcement this week – the implication being that of a Verstappen decision being made.
>Aside from McLaren’s competitive level, which is currently quite similar to Red Bull’s, the attraction of the Woking-based squad would likely be in the strength of its overall personnel and technical department, including the chance to reunite with former Red Bull colleague Rob Marshall, now the team’s chief technical officer and designer. Verstappen could also be reunited with Lambiase, who is set to take up the role of director of racing, although paddock whispers suggest he is set to take on the role of team principal as a succession plan for when Andrea Stella moves on in the future.
>There is also the fact that McLaren’s racing activities encompass far more than just Formula 1, potentially giving the Dutch driver the opportunity to compete at hypercar level in World Endurance Championship events.
>Officially, the door is shut on a potential Verstappen move, but, when approached by PlanetF1, multiple sources have failed to rule out the possibility of a deal being reached. But sources close to Piastri insist there is no reason for concern on his side, given the existence of a contract and the comments from Brown last week.
>But the existence of a contract doesn’t always mean certainty for a driver. While different circumstances due to his ongoing struggles, in 2022, McLaren bought Daniel Ricciardo out of his seat as the Australian held a contract for ’23, with the two sides holding amicable discussions to ease Ricciardo out – opening the door for Piastri’s arrival in the first place.
>Should the rumours play out as accurate and Verstappen does end up signing for McLaren, the most likely outcome for Piastri would be that of a straight swap as the Red Bull seat becomes available.