u/alettriste

Deje el nombre de la pastelería por si alguno pregunta. Me gusta el alfajor. Siempre primero el clásico, con azúcar I palpable. La galleta es bastante dura. A mi me gusta así (sisi, ya se como suena).

Primera vez que lo veo, en un chino. No es barato (3000), pero esta bastante bien. El chocolate es apenas una pintura con aerografo, bien finito. No está mal (soy fan de los de maicena o jorgito con glaseado así que se imaginan). DDL tradicional, bastante rico y las galletas no joden. Abundante. Yo le doy un 6.5 porque es caro por lo que trae, pero si no estaría muy bien.

I did run some simulation on this. I only ran the first 5 pulls up to the safety lane. First pull is "burst tire" free, so we have 4 pulls with a 25% chance of getting a flat tire in each. I performed 5000 simulated runs (several times, python), and the chances of getting a puncture before reaching the first safety lap are in the order of 68%. 2 out of 3 attempts will fail.

I guess we can mostry agree on this. What you also get from the simulation, however, is the chances of SEVERAL CONSECUTIVE failed runs up to the first safety lap.

Of all failed runs (67 of all attempts), individual failed runs (a failed run followed by a succesful one) are the most commom, 33% of the failed runs are followed by a successful one. Which means, 67% of the failed runs will be followed by ANOTHER FAILED run. For example, 6 consecutive failed runs happen in the zone of 6%, not usual but not impossibe. I have "seen" in the simulation up to 20 consecutive failed runs.

So.... this is the math.

My take? I need gold for fuel, not for freebies. I run only to the first safety lap. If I reach it, its all free, if not, I just lost a couple of minutes.

I find unbelievable that a company like Siemens would allow such a bulls**t comparison in a Linkedin article. But definitively, SIEMENS decided to say this... Mind it, I am a simulations engineer, and I am "pro simulation", but this is so very wrong it reaches lunacy levels. I commented in this post that the SR-71 was ALSO designed by hand...

Fast16, a 2005 malware that purportedly tampered with "calculation and simulation software". In the article thet mention LS-DYNA.

>Strategic sabotage rather than generic espionage

>According to SentinelLabs, the patching patterns suggest the driver was designed to hijack or influence the execution flows of precision calculation tools used in civil engineering, physics, and physical process simulations.

>Fast16’s tampering, the cybersecurity firm notes, would result in alternative outputs being produced, aiming for strategic sabotage.

>“By introducing small but systematic errors into physical‑world calculations, the framework could undermine or slow scientific research programs, degrade engineered systems over time, or even contribute to catastrophic damage,” SentinelLabs says.

>A wormable component allowed the threat to infect other systems on the same network and prevent the sabotage from being discovered by verifying calculations on a different machine.

>“The engine relies on a compact set of just over a hundred pattern-matching rules and a small dispatch table, so it only inspects bytes that are likely to matter,” SentinelLabs notes.

>The cybersecurity firm identified three high-precision engineering and simulation suites potentially targeted by Fast16, namely LS-DYNA 970, PKPM, and the MOHID hydrodynamic modeling platform, but has yet to identify binaries in the driver’s crosshairs.