Have you ever encountered profeminist online censorship? Can you give some examples of this?
Do you think that the new nonsense like "digital violence" and massive attempts to restrict the internet (ID, age verification and even chat surveillance) around the world is somehow connected to feminists' desire for even greater censorship?
https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/1t624wx/ukraine_is_a_global_surrogacy_hub_but_that_could/
All of a sudden, a lot of negative comments appear.
What is more, it happens almost at the moment of publication.
These users often subsribe to the same subs.
Ordinary people get the impression that almost everyone is against surrogacy. While plenty of polls, even in the most surrophobic countries, prove the opposite.
This is yet one completely overlooked point, which is a consequence of the lack of consolidation.
This is one of the reasons why bans on surrogacy are being passed so easily.
That's why gays post "they made surrogacy more difficult. I cried all night." and agencies jump from one location to another one.
Maybe it's to time to do something, before it's too late?!
upd: this is also harassment of families and IPs.
When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".
Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.
Is it because of patriachy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?
And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?
https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/2048048508062634078
After this tweet was published, a huge number of feminist reposts appeared, claiming that wars and forceful mobilizations and conscriptions are only men's guilt and women are not blame for anything. Even though women weren't mentioned at all in this post. It was also accompanied by a huge amount of gaslighting and ridicule towards men. It's high time to evaluate whether this is true, especially in 2026.
The most common claim that women don't start wars. However, historians debunked it. Quotation from Tanya Basu's book "European Queens waged more wars than Kings" reports that "28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power, as compared to the reign of a king."
The majority of women voted for male-only conscription in referendums in Austria and Switzerland.
Female president of Lithuania actively promoted male-only conscription in 2015. Female leaders of Brazil, Switzerland, Finland, South Korea, Taiwan, Moldova, Turkey, Myanmar, etc. haven't abolished conscription and haven't made it gender neutral.
Feminists canceled MRAs they are all far right, homophobes, transphobes (while it's European feminism is rapidly becoming homophobic and transphobic). That's why people are even afraid of calling this misandrist horror out.
And finally we need to address to not only the indifference but even the mockery of the thousands of adbucted men. Do they really have no male relatives at all? And after all this, feminists demand that men support their issues? This is blatant sexism!
Who will speak about it?
https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/2048048508062634078
After this tweet was published, a huge number of feminist reposts appeared, claiming that wars and forceful mobilizations and conscriptions are only men's guilt and women are not blame for anything. Even though women weren't mentioned at all in this post. It was also accompanied by a huge amount of gaslighting and ridicule towards men. It's high time to evaluate whether this is true, especially in 2026.
The most common claim that women don't start wars. However, historians debunked it. Quotation from Tanya Basu's book "European Queens waged more wars than Kings" reports that "28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power, as compared to the reign of a king."
The majority of women voted for male-only conscription in referendums in Austria and Switzerland.
Female president of Lithuania actively promoted male-only conscription in 2015. Female leaders of Brazil, Switzerland, Finland, South Korea, Taiwan, Moldova, Turkey, Myanmar, etc. haven't abolished conscription and haven't made it gender neutral.
Feminists canceled MRAs they are all far right, homophobes, transphobes (while it's European feminism is rapidly becoming homophobic and transphobic). That's why people are even afraid of calling this misandrist horror out.
And finally we need to address to not only the indifference but even the mockery of the thousands of adbucted men. Do they really have no male relatives at all? And after all this, feminists demand that men support their issues?
This is blatant sexism! Who will speak about it?
https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/2048048508062634078
After this tweet was published, a huge number of feminist reposts appeared, claiming that wars and forceful mobilizations and conscriptions are only men's guilt and women are not blame for anything. Even though women weren't mentioned at all in this post. It was also accompanied by a huge amount of gaslighting and ridicule towards men. It's high time to evaluate whether this is true, especially in 2026.
The most common claim that women don't start wars. However, historians debunked it. Quotation from Tanya Basu's book "European Queens waged more wars than Kings" reports that "28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power, as compared to the reign of a king."
The majority of women voted for male-only conscription in referendums in Austria and Switzerland.
Female president of Lithuania actively promoted male-only conscription in 2015.
Female leaders of Brazil, Switzerland, Finland, South Korea, Taiwan, Moldova, Turkey, Myanmar, etc. haven't abolished conscription and haven't made it gender neutral.
Feminists canceled MRAs they are all far right, homophobes, transphobes (while it's European feminism is rapidly becoming homophobic and transphobic). That's why people are even afraid of calling this misandrist horror out.
And finally we need to address to not only the indifference but even the mockery of the thousands of adbucted men. Do they really have no male relatives at all? And after all this, feminists demand that men support their issues?
This is blatant sexism! Who will speak about it?
https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/2048048508062634078
After this tweet was published, a huge number of feminist reposts appeared, claiming that wars and forceful mobilizations and conscriptions are only men's guilt and women are not blame for anything. Even though women weren't mentioned at all in this post. It was also accompanied by a huge amount of gaslighting and ridicule towards men. It's high time to evaluate whether this is true, especially in 2026.
The most common claim that women don't start wars. However, historians debunked it. Quotation from Tanya Basu's book "European Queens waged more wars than Kings" reports that "28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power, as compared to the reign of a king."
The majority of women voted for male-only conscription in referendums in Austria and Switzerland.
Female president of Lithuania actively promoted male-only conscription in 2015. Female leaders of Brazil, Switzerland, Finland, South Korea, Taiwan, Moldova, Turkey, Myanmar, etc. haven't abolished conscription and haven't made it gender neutral.
Feminists canceled MRAs they are all far right, homophobes, transphobes (while it's European feminism is rapidly becoming homophobic and transphobic). That's why people are even afraid of calling this misandrist horror out.
And finally we need to address to not only the indifference but even the mockery of the thousands of adbucted men. Do they really have no male relatives at all? And after all this, feminists demand that men support their issues?
This is blatant sexism! Who will speak about it?
https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/2048048508062634078
After this tweet was published, a huge number of feminist reposts appeared, claiming that wars and forceful mobilizations and conscriptions are only men's guilt and women are not blame for anything. Even though women weren't mentioned at all in this post. It was also accompanied by a huge amount of gaslighting and ridicule towards men. It's high time to evaluate whether this is true, especially in 2026.
The most common claim that women don't start wars. However, historians debunked it. Quotation from Tanya Basu's book "European Queens waged more wars than Kings" reports that "28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power, as compared to the reign of a king."
The majority of women voted for male-only conscription in referendums in Austria and Switzerland.
Female president of Lithuania actively promoted male-only conscription in 2015. Female leaders of Brazil, Switzerland, Finland, South Korea, Taiwan, Moldova, Turkey, Myanmar, etc. haven't abolished conscription and haven't made it gender neutral.
Feminists canceled MRAs they are all far right, homophobes, transphobes (while it's European feminism is rapidly becoming homophobic and transphobic). That's why people are even afraid of calling this misandrist horror out.
And finally we need to address to not only the indifference but even the mockery of the thousands of adbucted men. Do they really have no male relatives at all? And after all this, feminists demand that men support their issues?
This is blatant sexism! Who will speak about it?
https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/2048048508062634078
After this tweet was published, a huge number of feminist reposts appeared, claiming that wars and forceful mobilizations and conscriptions are only men's guilt and women are not blame for anything. Even though women weren't mentioned at all in this post. It was also accompanied by a huge amount of gaslighting and ridicule towards men. It's high time to evaluate whether this is true, especially in 2026.
The most common claim that women don't start wars. However, historians debunked it. Quotation from Tanya Basu's book "European Queens waged more wars than Kings" reports that "28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power, as compared to the reign of a king."
The majority of women voted for male-only conscription in referendums in Austria and Switzerland.
Female president of Lithuania actively promoted male-only conscription in 2015.
Female leaders of Brazil, Switzerland, Finland, South Korea, Taiwan, Moldova, Turkey, Myanmar, etc. haven't abolished conscription and haven't made it gender neutral.
Feminists canceled MRAs they are all far right, homophobes, transphobes (while it's European feminism is rapidly becoming homophobic and transphobic). That's why people are even afraid of calling this misandrist horror out.
And finally we need to address to not only the indifference but even the mockery of the thousands of adbucted men. Do they really have no male relatives at all? And after all this, feminists demand that men support their issues?
This is blatant sexism! Who will speak about it?
When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".
Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.
Is it because of patriachy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?
And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?
When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".
Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.
Is it because of patriarchy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?
And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?
When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".
Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.
Is it because of patriarchy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?
And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?
When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".
Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.
Is it because of patriarchy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?
And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?
When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".
Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.
Is it because of patriarchy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?
And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?
ILGA Europe have not included surrogacy in its annual reports but have included artificial insemination.
That is, biological parenthood doesn't matter for gays, but it does for lesbians.
Surrogacy must be addressed as an LGBTQ issue. And opposition to surrogacy is a form of homophobia. Lack of this is one of the main reasons why things are so bad with surrogacy in Europe. It is highly unlikely that they are unaware that today surrogacy is perhaps the only way to build families. As gay couples across Europe report that adoptions have become extremely difficult, if not impossible.
Why such disregard for us? Why on Earth is Spain dark green? For torturing gay families?
Gay men have completely lost their identity. And bi men are never taken seriously at all in the mainstream LGBTQ organizations. It is we who must determine our rights and not allow others to impose them on us.
Plus, servility to anyone who calls themselves a feminist, even if they cause a colossal damage. That's why ILGA Europe is afraid to include surrogacy as it could cost them politically, but isn't afraid of losing G and B(m) at all. Or simply don't want to do it in spite of the obvious demand for it. and instead of protesting, gays write on forums "They made surrogacy more difficult. I cried all night." And also upvote biased reports like that. Or repost it. Of course, it's about LGBTQ people.
Why is there such disregard for our most important issues in these LGBTQ organizations? Gay couples can't create families. What could be more important? Could this be changed? Or is everyone content with this grim situation?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEGgFJNbNW4
Where is gender equality? Feminists say they fight for gender equality. This pretty much violates gender equality. But they do nothing.
MRAs could protest against it, but feminists cancelled MRA.
Who will protest against it?