u/brownhawker

their e4 is limited to elitist snobs who think they’re baroque pearls in a sea of trash that no one has the depth to understand (but they don’t want to be understood to begin with because to have anything in common with the plebian masses is repulsive.) Only a hyperspecific flavor of SX4 (probably someone like luckovich) could ever really relate to this description, no SO4 or SP4 acts like this. their asses probably type clear SO4s as e9. speaking of e9, their e9 definition is incredibly broad “everything and yet nothing”. their “everybody is a sheeple but me” thing they outline so hard for e4 is a common trait found in other types, but they say that’s the defining neurosis of e4. the defining neurosis of e4 is false lack and envy, not that; somehow they looped back around to describing something like e2/false abundance, or i guess like e5..

also their stupid "being a 4 is not:" list describe things that all suit e4’s. it is true that those things don't make someone an e4 but they especially apply to fours so it's just STUPID. ALSO THEY TYPE EVERY SINGLE MOTHERFUCKER E9. SO9 ASHNIKKO AND SP9 MEGAN THEE STALLION ARE IDIOTIC TAKES

by the way.. e4 is not a rare type. sure they think they're special but they're not. don't try to rare-ify it and indulge their "fundamentally different" complexes... all the heart types are fairly common. if any type is rare it's the e8s 🦄

I previously typed myself as ILI, but my best friend has told me a few times that she thinks that I am wrong and that I'm actually SLI. After finally listening to her and doing more research into socionics, I think that she could be right. The only problem is that it's VERY contradictory with other parts of my typology (LVEF and INTP). I'm really confident that I'm right about my psychosophy placements, but not so confident when it comes to MBTI. Would it still be a huge contradiction if I retyped in MBTI and stayed SLI LVEF? Do I just need to reconsider ILI? I've never had a contradiction in my typology be this big before.

My best friend (pompom) is a 2 who has directly stated that they are "a bum who brings no help and provides nothing to the world"

Here are her suggestions:

the reformer/the perfectionist -> the critic. but also the perfectionist is fine enough

the helper/the giver -> the flatterer/coddler/pamperer

the achiever -> the performer maybe

the individualist/the artist -> the melancholic

the investigator -> the hermit, like the arcana card. (also the crab)

the loyalist -> the skeptic

the enthusiast -> the quack (double entendre, because sevens are frauds & are talkative so they quack a lot)

the challenger -> the rebel

the peacemaker -> the accomodator i don't know. peacemaker is fine i guess