Why I Sold the Sennheiser HD 660S2, Then Bought It Again
▲ 1 r/EverymanAudio+1 crossposts

Why I Sold the Sennheiser HD 660S2, Then Bought It Again

Buying the same pair of headphones twice probably sounds like a perfect example of the never-ending audiophile chase.

In my case, it was more complicated than that.

I originally bought the Sennheiser HD 660S2 when I was still very new to the headphone hobby. I had come from the Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro and had spent far too much time reading reviews that made the Sennheiser sound like it would completely transform my listening experience.

I expected an immediate wow factor.

It never arrived.

https://preview.redd.it/23p567hof5ih1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=844702ebf3a94011cbf03cb8a5507b9998142a75

Why I sold my first pair

The HD 660S2 did not sound bad. It just did not sound spectacular in the way I had imagined.

The soundstage was intimate, the treble was fairly relaxed and the bass did not hit with the exaggerated force I expected from something described as an improved, bassier member of the HD 600 family.

I was also using a Focusrite 2i4 at the time. My equipment was mainly intended for music production, and I had very little experience of comparing dedicated headphone amplifiers, different sound signatures or genuinely high-end headphones.

I assumed the HD 660S2 was not giving me enough for the money, so I sold it.

Looking back, the biggest problem was probably not the headphone.

It was my expectation of what an expensive headphone was supposed to do.

What changed afterwards?

Over the following 18 months, my entire listening setup changed.

I added the HiFiMAN Arya Stealth, FiiO FT1 and several IEMs. My desktop chain became the Topping DX5 II feeding the Topping L50 headphone amplifier and Apos Gremlin tube amplifier.

But more importantly, I gained experience.

I started recognising that soundstage width, bass quantity and immediately obvious detail were only parts of the listening experience. I became more aware of tonal balance, vocal placement, texture, cohesion and how comfortable a headphone was over a complete album.

My musical listening also continued to broaden. Pink Floyd remained one of my main references, but I was spending more time with Pearl Jam, Incubus, Fear Factory, Massive Attack, Daft Punk, soundtracks and music where the midrange and overall presentation mattered just as much as sub-bass or treble detail.

The more headphones I tried, the more I kept thinking about the HD 660S2.

Was I remembering the headphone or chasing the idea of it?

That was the difficult question.

Had my taste genuinely changed, or had I simply started romanticising something after selling it?

The HD 660S2 seemed as though it could fill a gap in my collection. The Arya Stealth already gave me scale, openness and detail. The DT 770 gave me a brighter, more energetic closed-back presentation, while the FT1 offered warmth, bass and ridiculous value for money.

What I did not have was that intimate, vocal-focused and emotionally direct Sennheiser presentation.

Then I found the HD 660S2 brand new for £260.

Naturally, I went back to Reddit and asked: “Am I an idiot for re-buying the Sennheiser HD 660S2?”

Opinions were mixed.

Some people thought it made perfect sense. Others pointed out, quite reasonably, that I had already owned and sold it once. A few suggested alternatives or argued that changing amplifiers would not suddenly turn it into a completely different headphone.

They were right about that last part.

https://preview.redd.it/48mof7hof5ih1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=13997a3edc8468d29c3102d56e6839b63b7c2179

Did the better equipment transform it?

Not completely.

The DX5 II and L50 provide plenty of clean power, while the Gremlin gives me another enjoyable flavour when I want it. The HD 660S2 now has all the headroom it needs, but it has not suddenly developed an Arya-sized soundstage or become a basshead headphone.

A better amplifier did not replace the HD 660S2 with a different headphone.

What changed more dramatically was me.

This time, I was no longer waiting for it to flatten me with bass, throw sounds across an enormous space or reveal details I had never heard before.

I listened to what it was actually doing.

That is when it clicked.

How it sounds to me now.

The HD 660S2 is intimate, smooth and wonderfully cohesive.

Vocals sit close and feel connected to the performance. Guitars have a convincing body, drums sound grounded, and the presentation holds everything together without constantly separating the music into individual technical elements.

Pink Floyd’s The Dark Side of the Moon does not sound as enormous as it does through the Arya Stealth, but it feels focused and connected. Vocals, guitars and effects occupy a smaller space, yet the album still flows naturally from beginning to end.

With Pearl Jam and Incubus, the midrange becomes the main attraction. Vocals and guitars have presence and texture without sounding aggressively pushed forward.

Fear Factory also highlights one of the limitations. The HD 660S2 can sound dense when a mix becomes particularly busy, and it does not provide the same separation or openness as the Arya. However, its smoother presentation makes aggressive music easier to enjoy over longer sessions.

Bass has more depth and substance than I remembered, but it is not the type of exaggerated low end that immediately dominates a demonstration. It supports the music rather than becoming the entire performance.

Treble is similarly restrained. There is enough detail for me, but it is not a bright or sparkling headphone. That relaxed top end is part of why I can listen for hours, although anyone wanting maximum air and excitement may find it too polite.

Why it works alongside the Arya Stealth.

The Arya Stealth and HD 660S2 are not trying to do the same job.

HiFiMAN Arya Stealth

Openness, scale, imaging and detail.

The Arya is the headphone I choose when I want cinematic space, clearly defined layers and the feeling that a recording has expanded beyond my head. Pink Floyd, trance and large soundtracks can sound spectacular through it.

Sennheiser HD 660S2

Intimacy, cohesion, vocals and emotional connection.

The Sennheiser brings the performance closer. It gives up some scale and separation but replaces them with a presentation that feels more compact, natural and personal.

One does not make the other redundant.

The Arya impresses me more quickly. The HD 660S2 quietly keeps me listening.

Comfort and build.

The initial clamp can be fairly strong, but the headphone becomes more comfortable as the headband loosens with use.

The overall design is lightweight, practical and reassuringly familiar. It does not feel luxurious in the way its original retail price might suggest, but it feels like something designed to be worn and maintained for years.

I also experimented with cooling-gel replacement pads, but they made the sound too dark and muddy for me. I returned to the original-style presentation because the pads are a fundamental part of the tuning, not merely a comfort accessory.

What I learned from buying it twice.

The first time, I judged the HD 660S2 against an imaginary version created by reviews, price and inexperience.

The second time, I judged it against the headphones I had actually lived with.

That completely changed how I understood it.

The HD 660S2 is not a headphone I would recommend to someone chasing the widest soundstage, the brightest treble or the most dramatic first impression. At its original price, I can also understand why people question its value.

At £260, however, it made far more sense for me.

It filled a genuine gap between the warmth and bass of my closed-back headphones and the enormous, revealing presentation of the Arya Stealth.

Most importantly, it gave me something I had started to miss.

https://preview.redd.it/6b2kx7hof5ih1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f3c03b2aa3e712c169bd2b64652166cd567a8904

Final thoughts

Was I an idiot for buying the HD 660S2 again?

Possibly. This hobby has certainly encouraged stranger decisions.

But rebuying it taught me something important: the equipment that impresses you most during a short comparison is not always the equipment you miss after it has gone.

The HD 660S2 did not suddenly become a different headphone. My expectations changed, my experience grew, and I finally understood what it was designed to do.

I sold the first pair because it did not give me the wow factor.

I kept the second pair because I realised the wow factor was never the point.

Have you ever sold a pair of headphones or IEMs, only to realise later that you completely misunderstood what made them special?

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 12 days ago
▲ 2 r/EverymanAudio+1 crossposts

Simgot SuperMix 4 Competitive FPS EQ Guide: Refining an Already Excellent Gaming IEM

I’ve spent a lot of time using the Simgot SuperMix 4 for competitive FPS gaming, particularly Fortnite, alongside games such as Destiny 2, COD/Warzone and Counter-Strike 2.

The SM4 is already one of my favourite gaming IEMs. Its imaging, separation and positional accuracy are excellent straight out of the box.

This profile isn’t intended to fix a bad gaming IEM or create positional information that isn’t already there. It simply adjusts the tuning to place greater emphasis on the parts of the mix I find most useful during competitive play.

My priorities were:

  • Positional accuracy
  • Separation
  • Transient clarity
  • Footstep intelligibility
  • Enough remaining bass to prevent the game sounding thin

https://preview.redd.it/bb57rod9vrhh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=c57940a5510e4791fb86d93aee61d683af6388f4

SM4 Competitive FPS PEQ.

Preamp: −6 dB

Filter Type Frequency Gain Q
1 Low shelf 35 Hz +1.5 dB 0.7
2 Peak 80 Hz +0.5 dB 0.9
3 Peak 220 Hz −1.2 dB 1.0
4 Peak 500 Hz −0.8 dB 1.0
5 Peak 1,800 Hz +2.0 dB 1.5
6 Peak 3,000 Hz +2.5 dB 2.0
7 Peak 5,200 Hz +2.0 dB 2.5
8 Peak 8,500 Hz +1.2 dB 2.5
9 High shelf 10,000 Hz +1.5 dB 0.7

My usual desktop chain is:

PC → Topping DX5 II → Topping L50 → Simgot SuperMix 4

The PEQ can still be used with other sources. You don’t need the same DAC or amplifier for the frequency adjustments to work.

What does the preamp do?

The preamp reduces the overall digital signal level before the individual filters are applied.

Several filters in this profile add gain. Without enough negative preamp, those boosts could push the signal beyond its maximum level and cause digital clipping.

I use −6 dB across my profiles for consistency and plenty of headroom.

You may need to increase the volume of your DAC or amplifier slightly after enabling the EQ. That is completely normal.

What does Q mean?

Q controls how wide or narrow each adjustment is.

  • A lower Q affects a broader range of frequencies.
  • A higher Q targets a narrower area.
  • A Q around 0.7 to 1.0 produces a wide, gradual change.
  • A Q around 2.0 to 2.5 creates a more focused adjustment.

The easiest way to think about it is:

  • Frequency: Where the adjustment happens
  • Gain: How much you change it
  • Q: How wide the adjustment reaches

You don’t need to understand the mathematics behind Q to use the profile. Entering the values as shown will reproduce the intended curve.

What each filter is doing.

35 Hz: +1.5 dB low shelf

This retains some very deep sub-bass.

A competitive profile doesn’t need to remove every trace of low-frequency energy. Doing that can make games sound unnaturally thin and remove some of the physical context from explosions and environmental effects.

Very deep sub-bass is also less likely to interfere with footstep clarity than excessive energy higher in the bass range.

80 Hz: +0.5 dB

This adds a very small amount of body.

It helps the SM4 retain some impact and substance without turning the profile into a bass-heavy gaming preset. The adjustment is deliberately subtle.

220 Hz: −1.2 dB

This is where the profile begins reducing some of the SM4’s lower-frequency weight.

The area around 220 Hz can add warmth and fullness, but it can also make a busy mix feel more congested. The small reduction gives other information more room without stripping away the body of the sound.

500 Hz: −0.8 dB

This gently cleans the lower midrange.

The cut is intentionally mild. It reduces a little thickness while avoiding the hollow or unnatural presentation found in some aggressive competitive presets.

1.8 kHz: +2.0 dB

This begins bringing useful midrange information forward.

Footsteps, movement, reloads and environmental interactions contain important information throughout the midrange. This filter helps those sounds stand out more clearly from the surrounding mix.

3 kHz: +2.5 dB

This is the strongest presence adjustment in the profile.

It adds definition to footsteps, reloads and the leading edges of positional effects. The relatively focused Q prevents the adjustment from lifting the entire upper midrange indiscriminately.

5.2 kHz: +2.0 dB

This increases transient clarity.

Short sounds become easier to identify when their initial attack is reproduced clearly. This can help separate individual effects rather than simply making the whole game louder.

8.5 kHz: +1.2 dB

This provides a controlled lift in upper detail.

It can help reveal subtle environmental information, surface textures and the quieter edges of positional effects. The adjustment is focused so that the entire treble range isn’t pushed forward aggressively.

10 kHz: +1.5 dB high shelf

This adds a little more air and openness.

It doesn’t create positional information, but it can prevent the presentation feeling enclosed and allow the SM4’s spatial qualities to breathe.

Why not simply remove all the bass?

Some competitive presets remove huge amounts of bass and apply extreme boosts to the upper midrange and treble.

That can make certain sounds more obvious, but it can also leave the game sounding thin, sharp and tiring.

My aim wasn’t to turn the SM4 into a one-purpose footstep detector. I wanted to retain enough weight for the game to sound believable while reducing the areas most likely to add unnecessary congestion.

That is why the profile keeps a little sub-bass while applying modest cuts through the mid-bass and lower midrange.

What EQ can and cannot do.

EQ changes the tonal balance of the sound.

It can:

  • Reduce congestion
  • Bring certain frequency ranges forward
  • Improve the perceived definition of short effects
  • Make existing positional information easier to identify

It cannot:

  • Create sounds the game hasn’t rendered
  • Repair inaccurate positional audio
  • Improve poor sound design
  • Manufacture a larger soundstage
  • Replace practice and map knowledge

The SM4’s imaging ability comes from the IEM and the game’s audio engine. This profile is intended to make better use of those existing strengths.

How to test the profile.

Don’t judge the EQ from a few seconds of switching back and forth during a chaotic match.

Use a familiar training area, replay, private game or quieter section of a map. Listen for repeatable sounds such as:

  • Footsteps moving around you
  • Changes between different surfaces
  • Reload animations
  • Equipment being equipped or used
  • Movement above and below you
  • The distance between near and far effects
  • Separation when several sounds overlap

Switch the profile on and off while repeating the same test.

Try to compensate for the lower volume caused by the −6 dB preamp. Louder often sounds clearer during a quick comparison, even when it isn’t providing more useful information.

Spend at least one proper session with the profile before changing it. Your ears need time to adjust to the reduced warmth and increased presence.

Adjust it for your own ears.

This profile is a starting point based on my preferences and equipment. Hearing, fit, ear tips and personal sensitivity all affect the result.

If the presentation feels too forward, begin by reducing the 3 kHz filter in small 0.5 dB steps.

If the upper detail feels too sharp, reduce the 5.2 or 8.5 kHz filters slightly.

If the profile sounds too thin, return a small amount of gain around 220 Hz rather than adding a huge bass shelf.

Change one filter at a time and keep notes. If you change several settings simultaneously, it becomes difficult to understand which adjustment actually helped.

Final thoughts.

The Simgot SuperMix 4 is already an excellent gaming IEM. Its imaging and separation don’t need to be rescued by extreme EQ or heavy processing.

This profile makes measured changes to its tonal balance, retaining enough sub-bass to keep the experience believable while creating more space around the midrange and bringing useful positional cues forward.

It won’t provide superhuman hearing, and it won’t transform the audio engine of the game you’re playing.

What it can do is make the SM4’s existing strengths easier to use during competitive play.

If you try it, let me know which game you used, what source you’re running and whether you adjusted any of the filters for your own ears.

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 8 days ago
▲ 6 r/EverymanAudio+2 crossposts

Punch Audio Martilo: The basshead IEM I nearly returned, one year later

I’ve owned the Punch Audio Martilo for around a year, so this is based on long-term use rather than a honeymoon-period listen. I bought it myself, as with all of my current gear, and nearly sent it back.

For context, I’m a musician and electronic music producer. My listening naturally includes plenty of trance, techno and progressive house, alongside liquid DnB, wave, new wave, industrial, nu-metal and plenty in between.

One of my main references when testing new equipment is Pink Floyd’s The Dark Side of the Moon, usually played from beginning to end. It covers practically everything I want to hear: atmosphere, movement, imaging, vocals, dynamics, bass control and whether a setup can make an album feel like one continuous experience.

More importantly, I know it well enough to notice when something sounds different without having to concentrate on audiophile terminology.

https://preview.redd.it/hhg4btb5mchh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=20d0154a2058304b9eb0b4560834571b695a69aa

Where is the legendary bass?

I bought the Martilo after reading and watching countless reviews describing it as an incredible basshead IEM and a must-own. Coming from the Simgot SuperMix 4, I expected to press play and immediately be flattened by an enormous wall of sub-bass.

That did not happen, to my dismay.

The bass was clearly there, but it wasn’t the thunderous upgrade I had imagined based on the countless reviews. My first impression was that the Martilo sounded slightly bloomy and boomy, while vocals had lost some of the sparkle and immediacy I enjoyed from the SuperMix 4. Some tracks sounded fantastic, but others felt strangely distant.

I checked the seal, tried several tips and seriously considered returning it for the Xenns Top Pro or Tea Pro. You can see the full confusion and eventual U-turn in my original post: Punch Audio Martilo not worth the “upgrade” in bass over the SuperMix 4.

Then my Tangzu Sancai Noble Stainless tips arrived, and something clicked.

What changed?

The new tips improved the fit and presentation, but the biggest change was resetting my expectations.

The Martilo doesn’t add huge bass to every track simply to remind you that it’s a bass-focused IEM. It drives home the bass that is already in the recording.

Give it properly engineered sub-bass, a powerful kick or a weighty bassline, and it delivers with real authority. Play something naturally bass-light, and it won’t artificially turn it into a nightclub.

That initially disappointed me, but it’s now one of the things I appreciate most about it.

After a few days of working through my library, I had to update my original Reddit post with: “I take it all back 😂”

Whether you call it acclimatisation or brain burn-in, the Martilo went from being packed for return to becoming the IEM I reached for every day.

How does it sound?

The simplest description is warm, weighty, smooth and highly musical.

The bass reaches deep and gives electronic music the scale and physical substance I want. Kick drums land with convincing weight, and basslines feel properly grounded, but the Martilo is more versatile than its “basshead IEM” label suggests. It also works surprisingly well with rock, industrial, new wave and more vocal-led material.

The midrange is warmer and less forward than the SuperMix 4. Vocals don’t jump out with the same brightness, especially when switching directly between the two. Initially, I thought the Martilo had lost too much sparkle. Once I adjusted, I found it more cohesive and much easier to listen to over long sessions.

Treble is smooth and non-fatiguing rather than aggressively detailed. There’s enough clarity that I don’t consider it dark, but it doesn’t constantly push every tiny detail towards the front of the mix.

The Martilo isn’t what I’d choose to dissect a recording. It’s what I choose when I want to stop thinking about the equipment and enjoy the music.

Martilo versus SuperMix 4

The SuperMix 4 sounds cleaner, brighter and more immediately detailed. Vocals cut through more clearly, and it separates busy mixes better to my ears. It’s also still my preferred IEM for competitive FPS gaming because positional information is easier to identify.

The Martilo sounds fuller, warmer, smoother and more substantial. Its bass has greater authority, and its relaxed presentation is less fatiguing.

It isn’t simply a SuperMix 4 with a subwoofer attached, which was essentially what I expected. It’s a different flavour entirely.

For critical listening and competitive gaming, I’d take the SuperMix 4. For musical enjoyment and immersive gaming, I’d take the Martilo.

https://preview.redd.it/713ojsb5mchh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36b2ebd7d79a7378a17fa457eccdfface3eb4a95

Fit, tips and cable

The shells are smaller and lighter than photographs suggest, and I can wear them comfortably for hours. Their lightweight construction does transmit a sharp sound if you accidentally knock them, though, which has made me wince a few times.

The stock silicone tips were comfortable, but the supplied foam tips irritated my ears after about an hour. The Sancai Noble Stainless tips were the first to make the Martilo click, while the Tangzu Sancai Brass tips have since become my preferred pairing.

The modular stock cable is genuinely nice, but I found it slightly microphonic, and the large ear hooks didn’t work brilliantly with the arms of my glasses.

My favourite combination is currently:

Martilo + Tangzu Sancai Brass tips + original VE Devastator dongle

https://preview.redd.it/qm5wnql8mchh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=eb91f3e25f9b89ece5440847ffcd320e9e3db4ea

That pairing gives me the thick, luxurious and engaging sound I now associate with the Martilo. It also pairs very well with my Apos Gremlin when I want a more characterful desktop session.

Final thoughts

The Martilo won’t suit everyone. If you want very forward vocals, bright treble or maximum analytical detail, there are better options. It’s also not guaranteed to deliver the comical, earth-shattering bass experience that some reviews may lead you to expect.

What it does deliver is deep, authoritative bass when the recording calls for it, combined with warmth, smoothness and a presentation I can enjoy for hours.

I nearly returned it because I judged it against an imaginary version created by the hype. Once I stopped waiting for that imaginary IEM and listened to what the Martilo was actually doing, it became my favourite musical set.

A year later, I still use it almost every day. That probably says more than any score I could give it.

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 12 days ago
▲ 6 r/Iemaudiophiles+1 crossposts

Punch Audio Martilo review: The IEM I nearly returned, but now use almost every day

I’ve owned the Punch Audio Martilo for around a year, so this is based on long-term use rather than a honeymoon-period listen. I bought it myself, as with all of my current gear, and nearly sent it back.

For context, I’m a musician and electronic music producer. My listening naturally includes plenty of trance, techno and progressive house, alongside liquid DnB, wave, new wave, industrial, nu-metal, and plenty in between.

One of my main references when testing new equipment is Pink Floyd’s The Dark Side of the Moon, usually played from beginning to end. It covers practically everything I want to hear: atmosphere, movement, imaging, vocals, dynamics, bass control and whether a setup can make an album feel like one continuous experience. More importantly, I know it well enough to notice when something sounds different without having to concentrate on audiophile terminology.

https://preview.redd.it/hhg4btb5mchh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=20d0154a2058304b9eb0b4560834571b695a69aa

Where is the legendary bass?

I bought the Martilo after reading and watching countless reviews describing it as an incredible basshead IEM, a MUST-OWN! Coming from the Simgot SuperMix 4, I expected to press play and immediately be flattened by an enormous wall of sub-bass.

That did not happen, to my dismay.

The bass was clearly there, but it wasn’t the thunderous upgrade I had imagined based on everything I’d read and watched. My first impression was that the Martilo sounded slightly bloomy and boomy, while vocals had lost some of the sparkle and immediacy I enjoyed from the SuperMix 4. Some tracks sounded fantastic, but others felt strangely distant.

I checked the seal, tried several tips and seriously considered returning it for the Xenns Top Pro or Tea Pro. You can see the full confusion and eventual U-turn in my original post: Punch Audio Martilo not worth the “upgrade” in bass over the SuperMix 4.

Then my Tangzu Sancai Noble Stainless tips arrived, and something clicked.

What changed?

The new tips improved the fit and presentation, but the biggest change was resetting my expectations.

The Martilo doesn’t add huge bass to every track simply to remind you that it’s a bass-focused IEM. It drives home the bass that is already in the recording.

Give it properly engineered sub-bass, a powerful kick or a weighty bassline, and it delivers with real authority. Play something naturally bass-light, and it won’t artificially turn it into a nightclub.

That initially disappointed me, but it’s now one of the things I appreciate most about it.

After a few days of working through my library, I had to update my original Reddit post with: “I take it all back 😂”

Whether you call it acclimatisation or brain burn-in, the Martilo went from being packed for return to becoming the IEM I reached for every day.

How does it sound?

The simplest description is warm, weighty, smooth and highly musical.

The bass reaches deep and gives electronic music the scale and physical substance I want. Kick drums land with convincing weight, and basslines feel properly grounded, but the Martilo is more versatile than its “basshead IEM” label suggests. It also works surprisingly well with rock, industrial, new wave and more vocal-led material.

The midrange is warmer and less forward than the SuperMix 4. Vocals don’t jump out with the same brightness, especially when switching directly between the two. Initially, I thought the Martilo had lost too much sparkle. Once I adjusted, I found it more cohesive and much easier to listen to over long sessions.

Treble is smooth and non-fatiguing rather than aggressively detailed. There’s enough clarity that I don’t consider it dark, but it doesn’t constantly push every tiny detail towards the front of the mix.

The Martilo isn’t what I’d choose to dissect a recording. It’s what I choose when I want to stop thinking about the equipment and enjoy the music.

Martilo versus SuperMix 4

The SuperMix 4 sounds cleaner, brighter and more immediately detailed. Vocals cut through more clearly, and it separates busy mixes better, to my ears. It’s also still my preferred IEM for competitive FPS gaming because positional information is easier to identify.

The Martilo sounds fuller, warmer, smoother and more substantial. Its bass has greater authority, and its relaxed presentation is less fatiguing.

It isn’t simply a SuperMix 4 with a subwoofer attached, which was essentially what I expected. It’s a different flavour entirely.

For critical listening and competitive gaming, I’d take the SuperMix 4. For musical enjoyment and immersive gaming, I’d take the Martilo.

https://preview.redd.it/713ojsb5mchh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36b2ebd7d79a7378a17fa457eccdfface3eb4a95

Fit, tips and cable

The shells are smaller and lighter than photographs suggest, and I can wear them comfortably for hours. Their lightweight construction does transmit a sharp sound if you accidentally knock them, though, which has made me wince a few times.

The stock silicone tips were comfortable, but the supplied foam tips irritated my ears after about an hour. The Sancai Noble Stainless tips were the first to make the Martilo click, while the Tangzu Sancai Brass tips have since become my preferred pairing.

The modular stock cable is genuinely nice, but I found it slightly microphonic, and the large ear hooks didn’t work brilliantly with the arms of my glasses.

My favourite combination is currently:

Martilo + Tangzu Sancai Brass tips + original VE Devastator dongle

That pairing gives me the thick, luxurious and engaging sound I now associate with the Martilo. It also pairs very well with my Apos Gremlin when I want a more characterful desktop session.

https://preview.redd.it/qm5wnql8mchh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=eb91f3e25f9b89ece5440847ffcd320e9e3db4ea

Final thoughts

The Martilo won’t suit everyone. If you want very forward vocals, bright treble or maximum analytical detail, there are better options. It’s also not guaranteed to deliver the comical, earth-shattering bass experience that some reviews may lead you to expect.

What it does deliver is deep, authoritative bass when the recording calls for it, combined with warmth, smoothness and a presentation I can enjoy for hours.

I nearly returned it because I judged it against an imaginary version created by the hype. Once I stopped waiting for that imaginary IEM and listened to what the Martilo was actually doing, it became my favourite musical set.

A year later, I still use it almost every day. That probably says more than any score I could give it.

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 16 days ago
▲ 5 r/InEarHifi+1 crossposts

Punch Audio Martilo review: The IEM I nearly returned, but now use almost every day

I’ve owned the Punch Audio Martilo for around a year, so this is based on long-term use rather than a honeymoon-period listen. I bought it myself (as with all of my current gear) and nearly sent it back.

For context, I’m a musician and electronic music producer. My listening naturally includes plenty of trance, techno and progressive house, alongside liquid DnB, wave, new wave, industrial, nu-metal, and plenty in between. One of my main references when testing new equipment is Pink Floyd’s The Dark Side of the Moon, usually played from beginning to end. It covers practically everything I want to hear: atmosphere, movement, imaging, vocals, dynamics, bass control and whether a setup can make an album feel like one continuous experience. More importantly, I know it well enough to notice when something sounds different without having to concentrate on audiophile terminology.

https://preview.redd.it/jrzf0i2michh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cea50cb60c7920eaf632cac18239e5b2f0d17638

Where is the legendary bass?

I bought the Martilo after reading and watching countless reviews describing it as an incredible basshead IEM, a MUST-OWN! Coming from the Simgot SuperMix 4, I expected to press play and immediately be flattened by an enormous wall of sub-bass.

That did not happen, to my dismay.

The bass was clearly there, but it wasn’t the thunderous upgrade I had imagined based on the countless reviews. My first impression was that the Martilo sounded slightly bloomy and boomy, while vocals had lost some of the sparkle and immediacy I enjoyed from the SuperMix 4. Some tracks sounded fantastic, but others felt strangely distant.

I checked the seal, tried several tips and seriously considered returning it for the Xenns Top Pro or Tea Pro. You can see the full confusion and eventual U-turn in my original post: Punch Audio Martilo not worth the “upgrade” in bass over the SuperMix 4.

Then my Tangzu Sancai Noble Stainless tips arrived, and something clicked.

What changed?

The new tips improved the fit and presentation, but the biggest change was resetting my expectations.

The Martilo doesn’t add huge bass to every track simply to remind you that it’s a bass-focused IEM. It drives home the bass that is already in the recording.

Give it properly engineered sub-bass, a powerful kick or a weighty bassline, and it delivers with real authority. Play something naturally bass-light, and it won’t artificially turn it into a nightclub.

That initially disappointed me, but it’s now one of the things I appreciate most about it.

After a few days of working through my library, I had to update my original Reddit post with "I take it all back 😂”. Whether you call it acclimatisation or brain burn-in, the Martilo went from being packed for return to becoming the IEM I reached for every day.

How does it sound?

The simplest description is warm, weighty, smooth and highly musical.

The bass reaches deep and gives electronic music the scale and physical substance I want. Kick drums land with convincing weight, and basslines feel properly grounded, but the Martilo is more versatile than its “basshead IEM” label suggests. It also works surprisingly well with rock, industrial, new wave and more vocal-led material.

The midrange is warmer and less forward than the SuperMix 4. Vocals don’t jump out with the same brightness, especially when switching directly between the two. Initially, I thought the Martilo had lost too much sparkle. Once I adjusted, I found it more cohesive and much easier to listen to over long sessions.

Treble is smooth and non-fatiguing rather than aggressively detailed. There’s enough clarity that I don’t consider it dark, but it doesn’t constantly push every tiny detail towards the front of the mix.

The Martilo isn’t what I’d choose to dissect a recording. It’s what I choose when I want to stop thinking about the equipment and enjoy the music.

Martilo versus SuperMix 4

The SuperMix 4 sounds cleaner, brighter and more immediately detailed. Vocals cut through more clearly, and it separates busy mixes better, to my ears. It’s also still my preferred IEM for competitive FPS gaming because positional information is easier to identify.

The Martilo sounds fuller, warmer, smoother and more substantial. Its bass has greater authority, and its relaxed presentation is less fatiguing.

It isn’t simply a SuperMix 4 with a subwoofer attached, which was essentially what I expected. It’s a different flavour entirely.

For critical listening and competitive gaming, I’d take the SuperMix 4. For musical enjoyment and immersive gaming, I’d take the Martilo.

https://preview.redd.it/92lona61jchh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a3c5aa263f14f48d6fa2c94b851e64f1a4fc125b

Fit, tips and cable

The shells are smaller and lighter than photographs suggest, and I can wear them comfortably for hours. Their lightweight construction does transmit a sharp sound if you accidentally knock them, though, which has made me wince a few times.

The stock silicone tips were comfortable, but the supplied foam tips irritated my ears after about an hour. The Sancai Noble Stainless tips were the first to make the Martilo click, while the Tangzu Sancai Brass tips have since become my preferred pairing.

The modular stock cable is genuinely nice, but I found it slightly microphonic, and the large ear hooks didn’t work brilliantly with the arms of my glasses.

My favourite combination is currently: Martilo + Tangzu Sancai Brass tips + original VE Devastator dongle

That pairing gives me the thick, luxurious and engaging sound I now associate with the Martilo. It also pairs very well with my Apos Gremlin when I want a more characterful desktop session.

https://preview.redd.it/mpmnn79ajchh1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=811b67189ec23368d7cf8341e7699a930f5c7ce0

Final thoughts

The Martilo won’t suit everyone. If you want very forward vocals, bright treble or maximum analytical detail, there are better options. It’s also not guaranteed to deliver the comical, earth-shattering bass experience that some reviews may lead you to expect.

What it does deliver is deep, authoritative bass when the recording calls for it, combined with warmth, smoothness and a presentation I can enjoy for hours.

I nearly returned it because I judged it against an imaginary version created by the hype. Once I stopped waiting for that imaginary IEM and listened to what the Martilo was actually doing, it became my favourite musical set.

A year later, I still use it almost every day. That probably says more than any score I could give it.

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 16 days ago
▲ 4 r/dub

Liquid DnB song name has been bugging and eluded me since the v.late 90s/00s

A family friend used to record Fabio and Groovriders' radio 1 shows on cassette and give them to me when he'd finished listening to them. There was one particular show that really stood out for me, as the guys were discussing recent shows and the club was so hot the needles were skipping on the turntables, and in another section of the show they were discussing something to do with Lobster and a female (if memory serves). I didn't understand it, as it probably had adult themes that I was unfamiliar with at the time, and my brain now cannot recall heavily.

The track was near the end of one side of the cassette so it was either towards the end of the first hour or 2nd hour of the show and had a trumpet playing the main riff ( do-do-do, do-do-doooooo) then a really lush sub drop that went something like bmmmmmmmmm, bmmm bm bmmmmmm (I feel like an idiot, but that's what i can remember).

I've searched through countless 90s/00s jungle compilations, as it was also round the time that Renegade - Terrorist was knocking about. I really need to find this track and relive those memories.

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 19 days ago

Beware of the DX5 II 4.4 mm Output? My Experience with TOPPING, EG Audio Store & AliExpress Warranty Support

Story time.....

I'm posting this partly to see if anyone else has experienced the same issue, and partly because I'm honestly shocked by how difficult it's been to obtain warranty support.

I purchased a TOPPING DX5 II from EG Audio Store on AliExpress in November 2025.

For the majority of its life I've used it as a DAC/preamp feeding a balanced TOPPING L50 headphone amplifier, so I rarely used the front headphone outputs.

Recently I started using the 4.4 mm balanced headphone output and immediately noticed something wasn't right.

The symptoms are:

• Distortion
• Audio cutting in and out
• Having to rotate or partially insert the 4.4 mm plug to obtain a clean signal
• The slightest movement causing audio to disappear or distort

I've tested this extensively with:

• Multiple balanced headphone cables
• Multiple headphones
• Different USB cables
• Different PCs
• Different power outlets

Every single headphone and cable works perfectly on my other equipment. The issue only exists on the DX5 II.

I even recorded a video demonstrating the fault and sent it to both TOPPING and the seller.

After reviewing everything, the seller themselves stated that their assessment was that the 4.4 mm output has a poor connection and requires repair or replacement.

So you'd think the next step would be straightforward...

Unfortunately not.

Here's how the support process has gone:

• AliExpress initially refused assistance because the return window had expired.
• The original store had disappeared from the platform, making contact impossible.
• TOPPING referred me back to the seller, and priovided me their email.
• The seller referred me back through AliExpress.
• Eventually everyone started communicating, but I'm now expected to pay to return a defective product to China before anything happens.

Even now there is:

• No guaranteed replacement.
• No confirmed refund of return postage.
• No clear turnaround time.
• No indication how long I'll be without the unit.

This is particularly frustrating because the DX5 II became the centrepiece of my desktop setup. I sold much of my previous equipment because I genuinely loved how it performed.

What concerns me even more is that after searching online, I discovered I'm far from alone.

There are multiple discussions on Reddit, Head-Fi and other audio forums describing what appears to be the same 4.4 mm balanced output problem.

Even more worrying are posts from users claiming the faulty output has damaged connected headphones. I obviously can't verify every individual report, but there are enough similar accounts that it doesn't feel like an isolated case.

I'm not posting this to attack TOPPING or EG Audio Store.

I simply expected a premium product with some semblance of after-sales support.

Instead I've spent weeks being passed between AliExpress, TOPPING and the seller, despite providing:

• Video evidence
• Serial number
• Proof of purchase
• Multiple rounds of testing
• Detailed fault descriptions

For anyone considering buying a DX5 II, I'd genuinely recommend doing your own research into the reported 4.4 mm balanced output issues before making a purchase.

I'd also be interested to hear from other DX5 II owners:

  • Have you experienced issues with the balanced headphone output?
  • How was your warranty experience?
  • Did anyone receive an advance replacement rather than having to ship the unit back first?

I'll continue to update this thread as the situation develops.

I genuinely hope TOPPING resolve this properly because I still believe they make excellent products. At the moment, however, my confidence in their after-sales support has been seriously undermined.

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 2 months ago
▲ 1 r/audio

Beware of the DX5 II 4.4 mm Output? My Experience with TOPPING, EG Audio Store & AliExpress Warranty Support

Story time.....

I'm posting this partly to see if anyone else has experienced the same issue, and partly because I'm honestly shocked by how difficult it's been to obtain warranty support.

I purchased a TOPPING DX5 II from EG Audio Store on AliExpress in November 2025.

For the majority of its life I've used it as a DAC/preamp feeding a balanced TOPPING L50 headphone amplifier, so I rarely used the front headphone outputs.

Recently I started using the 4.4 mm balanced headphone output and immediately noticed something wasn't right.

The symptoms are:

• Distortion
• Audio cutting in and out
• Having to rotate or partially insert the 4.4 mm plug to obtain a clean signal
• The slightest movement causing audio to disappear or distort

I've tested this extensively with:

• Multiple balanced headphone cables
• Multiple headphones
• Different USB cables
• Different PCs
• Different power outlets

Every single headphone and cable works perfectly on my other equipment. The issue only exists on the DX5 II.

I even recorded a video demonstrating the fault and sent it to both TOPPING and the seller.

After reviewing everything, the seller themselves stated that their assessment was that the 4.4 mm output has a poor connection and requires repair or replacement.

So you'd think the next step would be straightforward...

Unfortunately not.

Here's how the support process has gone:

• AliExpress initially refused assistance because the return window had expired.
• The original store had disappeared from the platform, making contact impossible.
• TOPPING referred me back to the seller, and priovided me their email.
• The seller referred me back through AliExpress.
• Eventually everyone started communicating, but I'm now expected to pay to return a defective product to China before anything happens.

Even now there is:

• No guaranteed replacement.
• No confirmed refund of return postage.
• No clear turnaround time.
• No indication how long I'll be without the unit.

This is particularly frustrating because the DX5 II became the centrepiece of my desktop setup. I sold much of my previous equipment because I genuinely loved how it performed.

What concerns me even more is that after searching online, I discovered I'm far from alone.

There are multiple discussions on Reddit, Head-Fi and other audio forums describing what appears to be the same 4.4 mm balanced output problem.

Even more worrying are posts from users claiming the faulty output has damaged connected headphones. I obviously can't verify every individual report, but there are enough similar accounts that it doesn't feel like an isolated case.

I'm not posting this to attack TOPPING or EG Audio Store.

I simply expected a premium product with some semblance of after-sales support.

Instead I've spent weeks being passed between AliExpress, TOPPING and the seller, despite providing:

• Video evidence
• Serial number
• Proof of purchase
• Multiple rounds of testing
• Detailed fault descriptions

For anyone considering buying a DX5 II, I'd genuinely recommend doing your own research into the reported 4.4 mm balanced output issues before making a purchase.

I'd also be interested to hear from other DX5 II owners:

  • Have you experienced issues with the balanced headphone output?
  • How was your warranty experience?
  • Did anyone receive an advance replacement rather than having to ship the unit back first?

I'll continue to update this thread as the situation develops.

I genuinely hope TOPPING resolve this properly because I still believe they make excellent products. At the moment, however, my confidence in their after-sales support has been seriously undermined.

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 2 months ago

Beware of the DX5 II 4.4 mm Output? My Experience with TOPPING, EG Audio Store & AliExpress Warranty Support

Story time.....

I'm posting this partly to see if anyone else has experienced the same issue, and partly because I'm honestly shocked by how difficult it's been to obtain warranty support.

I purchased a TOPPING DX5 II from EG Audio Store on AliExpress in November 2025.

For the majority of its life I've used it as a DAC/preamp feeding a balanced TOPPING L50 headphone amplifier, so I rarely used the front headphone outputs.

Recently I started using the 4.4 mm balanced headphone output and immediately noticed something wasn't right.

The symptoms are:

• Distortion
• Audio cutting in and out
• Having to rotate or partially insert the 4.4 mm plug to obtain a clean signal
• The slightest movement causing audio to disappear or distort

I've tested this extensively with:

• Multiple balanced headphone cables
• Multiple headphones
• Different USB cables
• Different PCs
• Different power outlets

Every single headphone and cable works perfectly on my other equipment. The issue only exists on the DX5 II.

I even recorded a video demonstrating the fault and sent it to both TOPPING and the seller.

After reviewing everything, the seller themselves stated that their assessment was that the 4.4 mm output has a poor connection and requires repair or replacement.

So you'd think the next step would be straightforward...

Unfortunately not.

Here's how the support process has gone:

• AliExpress initially refused assistance because the return window had expired.
• The original store had disappeared from the platform, making contact impossible.
• TOPPING referred me back to the seller, and priovided me their email.
• The seller referred me back through AliExpress.
• Eventually everyone started communicating, but I'm now expected to pay to return a defective product to China before anything happens.

Even now there is:

• No guaranteed replacement.
• No confirmed refund of return postage.
• No clear turnaround time.
• No indication how long I'll be without the unit.

This is particularly frustrating because the DX5 II became the centrepiece of my desktop setup. I sold much of my previous equipment because I genuinely loved how it performed.

What concerns me even more is that after searching online, I discovered I'm far from alone.

There are multiple discussions on Reddit, Head-Fi and other audio forums describing what appears to be the same 4.4 mm balanced output problem.

Even more worrying are posts from users claiming the faulty output has damaged connected headphones. I obviously can't verify every individual report, but there are enough similar accounts that it doesn't feel like an isolated case.

I'm not posting this to attack TOPPING or EG Audio Store.

I simply expected a premium product with some semblance of after-sales support.

Instead I've spent weeks being passed between AliExpress, TOPPING and the seller, despite providing:

• Video evidence
• Serial number
• Proof of purchase
• Multiple rounds of testing
• Detailed fault descriptions

For anyone considering buying a DX5 II, I'd genuinely recommend doing your own research into the reported 4.4 mm balanced output issues before making a purchase.

I'd also be interested to hear from other DX5 II owners:

  • Have you experienced issues with the balanced headphone output?
  • How was your warranty experience?
  • Did anyone receive an advance replacement rather than having to ship the unit back first?

I'll continue to update this thread as the situation develops.

I genuinely hope TOPPING resolve this properly because I still believe they make excellent products. At the moment, however, my confidence in their after-sales support has been seriously undermined.

reddit.com
u/daveyasprey — 2 months ago
▲ 3 r/FortNiteBR+1 crossposts

ESP-DIST-001 Error Windows PC

Tried logging in today and was greeted with a big red screen with the error ESP-DIST-001. I've verified files, flushed DNS IP etc. but still cannot log in, and the server is saying it's operational.

Any suggestions, please?

u/daveyasprey — 2 months ago

QC on an Omega Seamaster 6000M Ultra Deep SS VSF from NWBIGUK group

Morning all,

QC on an Omega Seamaster Ultra Deep VSF from NWBIGUK group

Looking for some opinions on the attached images for, what looks to me, to be a stunning example of the Omega Seamaster Ultra Deep

  1. Dealer name: NWBIGUK - https://t.me/nwbiguk2026
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Seamaster 6000M Ultra Deep SS VSF
  4. Price Paid: £260
  5. Album Links: Attached
  6. Index alignment: Looks solid, with no noticable tilts
  7. Dial Printing: clean and clear from what I can see in the images
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Clean and accurate, to my eyes
  10. Bezel: Clean and accurate, to my eyes
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): No noticeable major gaps. Looks within tolerance
  12. Timegrapher numbers: -3s/d, 271 eg, 0.0ms, 52 deg, 28800 frq
  13. Anything else you notice: Additional information below

Size : 45.5mm x 18.5mm

Movement : VSF custom made 1:1 super replica omega 8912 movement, almost same as genuine 8912 movement

Functions : Hours, minutes and seconds display

Case : 1:1 replicated solid 316L stainless steel case

Crystal : Scratch-proof sapphire crystal with AR coating

Dial : Summer blue dial

Bezel : Ui-directional rotating black ceramic bezel

Strap : Stainless steel bracelet

Clasp : Deployant clasp

u/daveyasprey — 3 months ago

This one has been a long time in the making but I'm absolutely buzzing to say that 'Something' with Caitlin Potter is finally OUT NOW 🫶🏼

Would love to know your thoughts below

u/daveyasprey — 4 months ago