![A US Marine looks at a dead North Vietnamese soldier, taken during Operation Prairie near the DMZ. October 1966 [750x1141]](https://preview.redd.it/jksecko0hauh1.jpeg?auto=webp&s=a6e9b3cc47b080af56f227253904dbc2a06df3b1)
u/hoyarugby2
![A US Marine looks at a dead North Vietnamese soldier, taken during Operation Prairie near the DMZ. October 1966 [750x1141]](https://preview.redd.it/jksecko0hauh1.jpeg?auto=webp&s=a6e9b3cc47b080af56f227253904dbc2a06df3b1)
Confederate dead lying where they fell along the Hagerstown Turnpike at Antietam. Photo taken September 19th, 1862 [1000x800]
[Inquirer] Why don’t construction and factory workers want to build ships?
inquirer.comHow to cope with heat and humidity in tropical places?
I have wanted to travel to Vietnam for years, and my desire has only been reinforced now that I've been reading deeply into the history of the Vietnam War.
However, I am a person who does not tolerate heat and especially humidity well. I hate summer here in the northeast US, I get quite sweaty from even doing things like going for a 30 minute walk when it's 90* out and moderately humid. Even during the dry season, southern Vietnam is always hot and fairly humid, basically the weather of a NE US summer at all times. Many of the places I'd like to go in Vietnam are battle/base sites further into the highlands, where the weather is even worse than in coastal towns. My past experience traveling to tropical/hot places is the Caribbean which doesn't count and Morocco in the winter, which likewise isn't helpful
Being a tourist especially somewhere like Vietnam involves spending much of the day walking around. I really don't want to have to pack 20 changes of clothes and shower 5x a day to remain presentable and not smelly, especially as I normally try to travel light with just a carryon sized bag
Any strategies or tips/tricks for handling the heat and remaining hygienic/presentable, especially for Vietnam?
Australian soldiers of the 6th RAR return to base after the battle of Long Tan. August 19th, 1966 [627x422]
US tanks and infantry from the 25th Division seal off the Cholon district of Saigon during "Mini Tet". May 8th, 1968 [500x332]
Young women swim in a fountain in Logan Square, Philadelphia, 1990 [1920x946]
A South Vietnamese UH-1 "Huey" drops South Vietnamese troops off in the Mekong Delta. July 18th, 1970 [3138x2165]
A US C-7 Caribou is hit by a friendly artillery shell while landing at Duc Pho Airbase. All three crewmembers were killed, August 3rd 1967 [792x607]
The US aircraft carrier USS Forrestal burns after an accidental rocket detonates bombs - 134 sailors were killed. July 29th, 1967 [3000x2248]
French paratroopers land amid sand dunes during Operation Camargue during the 1st Indochina War. July 28th, 1953 [983x700]
A M50 Ontos tank destroyer drives past a medic treating a wounded Marine. Hue, Vietnam February 23rd 1968 [1506x1359]
A destroyed South Vietnamese M41 tank lies buried in the rubble of Quang Tri, the site of the longest and bloodiest battle of the war. 1972 [817x816]
Why did the US not put serious effort into training and equipping ARVN units until late in the 1960s?
I was watching a lecture about William Westmoreland last night, and the lecturer mentioned that one of his great failures as the architect of US policy in Vietnam was not taking the training and equipping of ARVN forces seriously. He mentioned that ARVN forces were generally more poorly equipped than PAVN ones until Vietnamization, with ARVN's WW2 era weapons outgunned by modern PAVN ones. Another memoir I listened to from a US advisor said that the US hadn't taken the training of RF/PF forces seriously until after Tet, but once they were properly trained and equipped they were very effective
On its face this seems like insane policy by the US. The later war showed that ARVN could hold their own against North Vietnamese forces when supported by US airpower, so why did it take so long for the US to start properly equipping and training ARVN forces?