u/minzhu0305

虽然说世界各地都有这种案例，中国大陆也有保姆行业，但毕竟不是主流。台湾也有很多雇佣外籍护理人员，但那是护理职业较多。欧美也有管家，跟家佣这种地位极低的家庭佣工完全不同。梳理下来，只有印度和中国香港非常流行这种主仆式用工方式。为什么呢？

Is this related to the education of master-servant relationships under the colonial system?

As the title suggests

刷了两次，感觉风格不太一样，而且更新频率太高，完全跟隐退之前的状态不一样。不像一个70多岁老头能有的精力。

而且其内容也并没有敏感问题，但是奇怪的是国内互联网完全没有同步或者相关视频。

虽说张召忠是看不上印度吧，过去也确实喜欢拿印度开玩笑，但是youtube上“复出”视频有事没事盯着印度就有问题了。

其风格可以与司马南，张维为相比。这就很奇怪。张召忠不至于堕落成这样吧。

X上一般亲中国官方的大陆账号都会有国旗。普通使用VPN的大陆用户大概率也不会购买X会员认证。或者保持低调，不会活跃发贴。而那些为中国挺身而出反制印度的账号，大量是X认证会员而且没有国旗标示。这很让人感到疑惑。难道面对印度强大的反中舆论，激发了他们内心的爱国情怀了吗？

自己的制造的垃圾自己带走是一个很好的自我素养要求，我也是这么要求自己的。但是如果带走别人的垃圾，我觉得是在用行动指责别人的问题。是另一种不礼貌的举动。尤其是在别人的场地。这里面我怎么总感觉到怪怪的。道德展示？或者是一种作秀？比如我们一些团体在参加某种活动是会被要求如何如何。朝鲜的一些拉拉团被要求如何展现朝鲜的风采一样。或者文化差异，无法理解的行为。

当然这只我的感觉，怪怪的。活动本身是一种释放压力的方式，但是我却看到了某种压抑的感觉。说实话，我更喜欢球迷咆哮的场景，赛后可控的骚乱。我认为那是体育赛事应有的样子。

由此，我忽然感觉旁边的这个压抑的邻居可能真的需要警惕。

大家如何看待？

I've thought about this question seriously before. I'm neither a feminist nor a chauvinist. What's your opinion?

Additional information: I'm from China.

As is well known, there are over one million Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, and Bangladesh itself faces economic difficulties, making it unable to provide sufficient humanitarian aid. Furthermore, the refugees' struggle to integrate into local society further exacerbates the humanitarian crisis.

Wealthy countries around the world are also unwilling to accept refugees from incompatible cultural backgrounds and with low levels of education. Myanmar is even less likely to accept them back to their homes. This appears to be an unsolvable humanitarian disaster.

Therefore, I propose that the world's major powers provide Bangladesh with a total of $150 billion in long-term, interest-free loans in exchange for Bangladesh's formal acceptance of these refugees. Simultaneously, Bangladesh would be permitted to grant residency only to first-generation refugees, and newborns and children would receive Bangladeshi education before obtaining citizenship. Afterward, these refugees would be dispersed throughout the country to better integrate into local societies and reduce future conflict.

A $150 billion interest-free long-term loan could rapidly upgrade Bangladesh's infrastructure. In the short term, the country's GDP and living standards will significantly improve. To alleviate concerns from lending countries, an international monitoring body will oversee the use of development funds to ensure they are used for infrastructure construction.

This will benefit all parties. The Rohingya will receive humanitarian aid. Myanmar will face reduced pressure and its treatment of the remaining Rohingya within its borders will improve. Bangladesh will receive a substantial economic development fund.

The risk lies in whether the second-generation refugees can integrate into Bangladeshi society as planned. Poor integration could lead to new conflicts within the country. Furthermore, refugees from other countries may demand similar aid in exchange for their acceptance.

What are your thoughts on this plan?

As the title suggests, I almost never consider Albania to be one of the Muslim countries.

As the title suggests, here is my question.

Despite facing a severe shortage of jobs, why does India continue to restrict foreign investment and impose extremely strict requirements on all foreign investors? In contrast, why is Bangladesh, which is also part of the South Asian cultural sphere, so eager to attract foreign investment?

Both India and Myanmar are nations pieced together by British colonialists; why is it that, following independence, India achieved relatively successful integration, while Myanmar ultimately descended into its current state of prolonged fragmentation?