u/panda_motorworks

Image 1 — A few Bolt-ons + Panda Tuning = Big difference on the dyno for our Z.
Image 2 — A few Bolt-ons + Panda Tuning = Big difference on the dyno for our Z.
Image 3 — A few Bolt-ons + Panda Tuning = Big difference on the dyno for our Z.
Image 4 — A few Bolt-ons + Panda Tuning = Big difference on the dyno for our Z.
▲ 109 r/RZ34+1 crossposts

A few Bolt-ons + Panda Tuning = Big difference on the dyno for our Z.

We put our 2023 Nissan Z on the dyno to compare Stock 91 vs 91 Panda Tune Only vs 91 Panda Tune / Map Catback / GESI Downpipes, and the results speak for themselves.

Stock on 91:
359 WHP / 337 WTQ

Panda 91 Tune Only:
404 WHP / 468 WTQ
+45 WHP
+131 WTQ

Panda 91 Tune + GESI Downpipes + MAP Catback:
431 WHP / 494 WTQ
+72 WHP over stock
+157 WTQ over stock
+27 WHP / +26 WTQ over tune only

The biggest thing you’ll notice isn’t just peak power — it’s the massive torque increase and how much earlier it comes in. The tuned setups hit hard in the midrange and carry power much more smoothly through the RPM range compared to stock.

This is exactly why proper calibration paired with quality hardware makes such a difference. The tune wakes the car up, and the Turbo back Exhaust lets it breathe so we can push things even further.

Dyno tested in-house on our Dynojet.

Panda Tuning 2023+ Nissan Z
https://www.pandamotorworks.com/products/panda-motorworks-2023-nissan-ecutek-tuning-suite-phone-flash

MAP Gesi Downpipes
https://www.pandamotorworks.com/products/maperformance-downpipes-2023-nissan-z-3-0tt-and-2016-2021-infiniti-q50-q60-3-0tt-rwd

AWE Catback
https://www.pandamotorworks.com/products/awe-2023-nissan-z-rz34-rwd-exhaust-suite?\_pos=1&\_sid=b486241cf&\_ss=r

MAP Catback
https://www.pandamotorworks.com/products/maperformance-cat-back-exhaust-system-2023-nissan-z

Shop All 2023+ Nissan Z Parts
https://www.pandamotorworks.com/pages/z

Don't have a Z checkout the site, we support a lot of different platforms!
https://www.pandamotorworks.com/

#DynoResults #CarTuning #PerformanceTuning #Horsepower #Torque #DynoJet #CarMods #TurboPower #ECUTuning #BuildNotBought

u/panda_motorworks — 2 days ago
▲ 363 r/Foxbody+1 crossposts

2.3L EcoBoost in a Foxbody Drift Car

Chelsea DeNofa’s 2.3L EcoBoost Foxbody is a cool project and we were proud to have a part in it.

Panda Motorworks built the motor for this car and helped with the calibration to make sure the setup was right for the way the car is being used. In a drift application, the engine package needs to be responsive, consistent, and reliable under load. That starts with the right mechanical foundation before you ever get into final tuning.

The 2.3L EcoBoost is an interesting choice for a Foxbody because it brings modern turbocharged power into a lightweight chassis. It gives the car a different feel than a traditional Foxbody setup while still keeping the powerband useful for drifting.

A unique build, a real performance purpose, and an EcoBoost platform being used in a serious drift car.

What do you guys think of the setup?

u/panda_motorworks — 7 days ago
▲ 158 r/Foxbody

1989 Foxbody Terminator X Install Turned Into a Good Reminder: Diagnose Before You Tune

We had a 1989 Mustang Foxbody come into the shop recently for a Holley Terminator X install, new intake manifold, and full dyno tune.

The car showed up not running, so the plan seemed pretty simple on paper: get the Terminator X installed, get the car fired up, and start dialing it in on the dyno.

Once we got it running and started working through the tuning process, something felt off.

Instead of just trying to tune around it, we stopped and started diagnosing. A tune is only going to be as good as the mechanical condition of the car, and if there is an issue hiding underneath, forcing the calibration is just going to create more problems.

Even though the intake manifold had just been installed, we decided to smoke test it.

Good thing we did.

The smoke test showed a vacuum leak on the driver’s side lower portion of the intake manifold. One of the new intake manifold gaskets had failed, and smoke was visibly escaping from that area.

If we had tried to tune it that way, the car would have been fighting drivability issues, poor performance, and an inaccurate calibration from the start.

We pulled the intake back off, cleaned and inspected the sealing surfaces, reinstalled everything, and smoke tested it again. No leaks the second time.

After that, we could move forward with the dyno tune knowing the engine was sealed up and mechanically ready.

That is the part of tuning that does not always get talked about enough. It is not just plugging in a laptop and chasing a number. Sometimes the most important part is knowing when the car is telling you something is wrong and fixing it before you start pushing it.

Proper diagnosis matters just as much as the parts and the tune.

u/panda_motorworks — 7 days ago

2022–2024 Maverick 2.0L EcoBoost Dyno Results (Stock vs Stage 2 93 vs E50)

The 2022–2024 Maverick 2.0L EcoBoost is a pretty fun truck from the factory, but they really start to wake up with a few simple upgrades and the right tune.

Setup on this one:

MBRP catback
CVF intercooler
COBB Accessport
Panda Motorworks Stage 2 93 and E50 tunes

https://preview.redd.it/eskb2lli1z0h1.jpg?width=2048&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c00057ee7bad5884c09a65ec990b5964d8c7adc8

https://preview.redd.it/zynpelli1z0h1.jpg?width=910&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a22f6b2d52674d84b6c5f0768c2744339b050f70

Dyno numbers:

Stock 93: 229 hp / 308 tq
Stage 2 93: 269 hp / 355 tq
Stage 2 E50: 294 hp / 368 tq

That puts the E50 setup around +65 hp and +60 tq over stock.

Pretty impressive for a Maverick with basic bolt-ons, fuel, and tuning. The torque difference is the part that really stands out.

Anyone else here tuned their Maverick yet? Curious what setups people are running.

reddit.com
u/panda_motorworks — 8 days ago
▲ 23 r/FocusST

We’re Panda Motorworks. You’ve probably seen our parts, tunes, installs, or Reddit threads. Ask us anything; good, bad, or technical.

Hey Reddit, we’re Panda Motorworks.

We’re an aftermarket performance shop in O’Fallon, Missouri. We sell parts, install them, test them, tune cars, and spend way too much time talking about what actually works and what doesn’t.

We’ve seen Panda brought up on Reddit a few times; fitment questions, tuning questions, BPV/BOV setups, lighting, product releases, shipping times, stock status, and everything in between.

So we figured we’d do an AMA and open it up.

​Ask us about our company, Focus ST tuning, bolt-ons, Accessports, exhausts, intercoolers, intakes, daily-driver setups, what parts are worth the money, what parts are overhyped, how we pick brands, fitment questions before ordering, or what actually happens when something gets delayed.

We’re not going to act like every order, install, or process has always gone perfectly. This industry can be messy. Vendor inventory changes, lead times move, fitment details matter, and communication is a big deal. We’ll answer what we can honestly and try to give people real info before they spend money on their car.

Ask us anything; easy questions, technical questions, hard questions, or platform-specific questions.

reddit.com
u/panda_motorworks — 8 days ago

Our Shop 2.3L Bronco Keeps Getting Better on the Dyno

We’ve been continuing to dial in our shop’s 2021 2.3L Bronco, and every time we strap it down to the dyno, it keeps getting better.

Baseline numbers were:
Stock: 232 WHP / 305 WTQ
With the Ford Performance calibration, it picked up nicely:
FRPP: 284 WHP / 337 WTQ
Gain: +52 WHP / +32 WTQ

Now with our custom Panda 93 tune via HP Tuners RTD, the Bronco is making:
Panda 93: 305 WHP / 365 WTQ
Gain over stock: +73 WHP / +60 WTQ

Current setup is very simple:
Mishimoto intake
Mishimoto intercooler
X-Force cat-back exhaust
Custom Panda 93 tune via HP Tuners RTD

For a basic bolt-on 2.3L Bronco, we’re really happy with the results. The torque gain is the biggest thing you feel, and the Bronco pulls much harder through the midrange compared to stock. Our E50 tune will be available soon.

Curious what other 2.3L Bronco owners are running. Anyone else tuned yet, or still on the fence?

u/panda_motorworks — 8 days ago

Elantra N Exhaust

We just finished an install video on the AWE SwitchPath™ Cat-Back Exhaust for the 2022+ Hyundai Elantra N and wanted to share it for anyone considering an exhaust upgrade.

In the video, Panda Motorworks walks through the install, fitment, and key features of the system. The big thing with the SwitchPath setup is that it keeps the factory valve control, so you can cruise with a more refined tone and then open it up in N Mode when you want the car to get aggressive.

We also compare it against the AWE Track Edition, which is the louder, full-volume option for anyone who wants maximum sound all the time.

A few highlights on the SwitchPath system:

Built in the USA from T304 stainless steel
Uses 3-inch and 2.5-inch CNC mandrel-bent tubing
Direct bolt-on fitment
Retains factory valve functionality
Adjustable 5-inch double-walled tips
Backed by AWE’s Perfect Fitment Guarantee, Lifetime Warranty, and No CEL Guarantee

This is one of the better exhaust options for the Elantra N if you want improved sound, better flow, and the ability to keep the car livable when cruising.

Check out the install video and let us know which setup you’d pick: SwitchPath or Track Edition?

youtube.com
u/panda_motorworks — 8 days ago