u/sneakerhead44891

1. Dealer name: ArcStudios
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 GRNR Bruce Wayne on Jubilee Bracelet JH3285 (Free Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: $678 shipped
5. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/eQFSeKi
6. Index alignment: Mostly looks good.
7. Dial Printing: Looks normal.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems mostly centered. maybe a hair tilted, but better than many recent Rich Bruce Wayne QCs.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from QC pics.
10. Bezel: Well centered, numbers are crisp, and no speedbumps.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Perfect
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d with 254 amplitude and 0.2ms beat error at 52 lift angle.
13. Anything else you notice: Not particularly. Video of winding in the comments.

1. Dealer name: ArcStudios
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 GRNR Bruce Wayne on Jubilee Bracelet JH3285 (Free Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: $678 shipped
5. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/eQFSeKi
6. Index alignment: Mostly looks good.
7. Dial Printing: Looks normal.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems mostly centered. maybe a hair tilted, but better than many recent Rich Bruce Wayne QCs.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from QC pics.
10. Bezel: Well centered, numbers are crisp, and no speedbumps.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Perfect
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d with 254 amplitude and 0.2ms beat error at 52 lift angle.
13. Anything else you notice: Not particularly. Video of winding in the comments.

Second QC, first one seemed to be a major RL.

1. Dealer name: ArcStudios
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 GRNR Bruce Wayne on Jubilee Bracelet JH3285 (Free Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: $678 shipped
5. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/CO4stUP
6. Index alignment: Mostly looks good. 12 seems to have a slight tilt.
7. Dial Printing: Looks normal.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel seems low. But that might be the angle. And there seems to be more than usual amount of the blue stuff in the cyclops, causing it to be a little blurry. Numbers themself look clean.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from QC pics.
10. Bezel: Well centered.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Maybe a small gap on the top right, everything else looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +0s/d with 267 amplitude and 0.0ms beat error at 52 lift angle.
13. Anything else you notice: The biggest off to me is the date cyclops. This is my second QC as the first one was the one with the misaligned "18" on the bezel. I am very particular with these so if it means RL and waiting longer because this watch is "just ok" then thats fine by me. I would definitely appreciate anyone's thoughts here, thanks so much!

NEW VIDEO OF DATE/MOVEMENT FIRST SLIDE IN THE LINK

1. Dealer name: ArcStudios
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 GRNR Bruce Wayne on Jubilee Bracelet JH3285 (Free Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: $678 shipped
5. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/CO4stUP
6. Index alignment: Mostly looks good. 12 seems to have a slight tilt.
7. Dial Printing: Looks normal.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel seems low. But that might be the angle. And there seems to be more than usual amount of the blue stuff in the cyclops, causing it to be a little blurry. Numbers themself look clean.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from QC pics.
10. Bezel: Well centered.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Maybe a small gap on the top right, everything else looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +0s/d with 267 amplitude and 0.0ms beat error at 52 lift angle.
13. Anything else you notice: The biggest off to me is the date cyclops. This is my second QC as the first one was the one with the misaligned "18" on the bezel. I am very particular with these so if it means RL and waiting longer because this watch is "just ok" then thats fine by me. I would definitely appreciate anyone's thoughts here, thanks so much!

1. Dealer name: ArcStudios
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 GRNR Bruce Wayne on Jubilee Bracelet JH3285 (Free Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: $678 shipped
5. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/6uaHkep
6. Index alignment: Mostly looks good. 6 might have a slight clockwise tilt.
7. Dial Printing: Looks relatively normal.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel seems pretty centered, although I'm not exactly sure. The date wheel looks a little blurry on the top of the cyclops but that nay just be the angle. Numbers look clean. Also most of the photos are obstructed by the hands.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from QC pics.
10. Bezel: A few issues stood out here. I added two photos with text to further explain this. The 12 o'clock triangle seems to be misaligned unless you turn the bezel which is what the TD did. Furthermore, the 6 and 18 aren't even and do seem misaligned. 6 is well aligned, but the 18 is noticeably higher.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Gap on the top right, everything else looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d with 263 amplitude and 0.0ms beat error at 52 lift angle.
13. Anything else you notice: All in all there are a few mistakes which I mentioned, the Bezel alignment being the biggest mistake present. Also I know that the date photos do have hands in the way.
14. I am very particular with these so if it means RL and waiting longer because this watch is "just ok" then thats fine by me. I would definitely appreciate anyone's thoughts here, thanks so much!

1. Dealer name: ArcStudios
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 GRNR Bruce Wayne on Jubilee Bracelet JH3285 (Free Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: $678 shipped
5. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/6uaHkep
6. Index alignment: Mostly looks good. 6 might have a slight clockwise tilt.
7. Dial Printing: Looks relatively normal.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel seems pretty centered, although I'm not exactly sure. The date wheel looks a little blurry on the top of the cyclops but that nay just be the angle. Numbers look clean. Also most of the photos are obstructed by the hands.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from QC pics.
10. Bezel: A few issues stood out here. I added two photos with text to further explain this. The 12 o'clock triangle seems to be misaligned unless you turn the bezel which is what the TD did. Furthermore, the 6 and 18 aren't even and do seem misaligned. 6 is well aligned, but the 18 is noticeably higher.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Gap on the top right, everything else looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d with 263 amplitude and 0.0ms beat error at 52 lift angle.
13. Anything else you notice: All in all there are a few mistakes which I mentioned, the Bezel alignment being the biggest mistake present. Also I know that the date photos do have hands in the way. I am very particular with these so if it means RL and waiting longer because this watch is "just ok" then thats fine by me. I would definitely appreciate anyone's thoughts here, thanks so much!

QC

1. ⁠Dealer name: ArcStudios
2. ⁠Factory name: Rich
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Bruce Wayne GMT
   126710GRNR
4. ⁠Price Paid: $676 USD
5. ⁠Album Links:
6. ⁠Index alignment: 12 is tilted to the left. Everything else seems fine.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: seems normal
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: solid
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: solid nothing really sticks out.
10. ⁠Bezel: solid but not sure something might look a bit off .
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): good
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: solid
13. ⁠Anything else you notice please point it out.

Assuming both fit, and price difference aside, which do you guys prefer and why? (Can justify reason by general opinion on watch, how each is viewed, which is more sought after, etc).

Edit: To whoever isn’t a huge fan of either, what are some alternative all gold options in the 50-60k range