u/succubusdicks

Kidnapping​, rape and literally killing your partner ain't it as long as someone involved gets​ off to it according to them s​​o???​​

So New Mexico filed a lawsuit against Meta a few years ago and the results of that lawsuit have been published. Meta will need to pay around $570 million to affected victims among other remedies.
The fact finding & other details noted in the lawsuit pointed out how Meta's Instagram was contributing to the mental health crisis in New Mexico; of note to this group is more than likely going to be section "F. Meta’s engagement features encourage and facilitate problematic interactions between adults and children."

You know how people on here keep pointing out how they see grooming content like videos of teenagers dancing with their """older""" boyfriends? Especially if they have kids? Instagram's recommendation features enabled that.

Partial copy/paste

>When a user engages with accounts held by children under the age of 18, the company’s algorithms recommend more accounts held by children under the age of 18 and similar content to that user. For example, Meta conducted internal tests in June 2019 which found that “[u]sers that follow minors’ accounts will be recommended similar accounts as well as photos of teens in explore.” [Pl. Ex. 01730 at 4] The June 2019 internal document assessed inappropriate interactions with children on Instagram, and reported that “26% of the people we recommend to Groomers were Teens.” [Pl. Ex. 1730 at 3] In an internal chat from October 2020, a Meta employee stated that the feature “[People You May Know] was responsible for 80% of violating adult/minor connections.” [Pl. Ex. 00248 at 2]

80%....But people will say this is not a major problem and the solution is to helicopter Mom kids...
Meta is literally called a "public nuisance" in the statement; which is way too nice of a way to describe this company.

(FOMO = Fear Of Missing Out)

I understand people are concerned about the availability of PS5 games due to Sony's announcement, but these posts do nothing but encourage resellers and unhealthy hoarding of games.

The only time I have heard of Jump Force mentioned in years and it's people on this sub trying to FOMO people into buying up copies and "me caveman digital bad" shit posting.

Can we add this to the rules on here? They contribute nothing to the conversations here. ​

Kinksters love to believe that they are practicing some sort of liberated form of sex. They will preach about how their deviance is interconnected with minority groups such as LGBT people citing falsified history of leather clad males running the show (sometimes they'll add random trans people for the unicorn hunters). Everyone claiming their community is harmful, including LGBT people and kink victims are the real c​onservatives to them; in their minds they are constantly vilanized and opressed.

There have been multiple conversations on here about how kinksters are the real conservatives here; all the way down to having their own form of religion in a man's orgasm being the one true virtue they all abide by.

Their constant religious catastrophizing about porn bans is akin to End of World times predictions; to be a part of kink communities you must believe that the puritans and their conservative politician overlords are trying to erase your existence just like the gays. Europe had the audacity to ban incest & strangulation porn and they were absolutely livid. How dare they ban a form of pornography that was encouraging men to strangle women to the point stats are showing an increase in women under 40 having strokes?

Even common sense bans, such as AI generated porn fakes of people are decried as the next step to banning two men kissing in public. Anything that might make it illegal for a man to orgasm is considered evil to them.

The (sad) reality is that the massive porn bans they cry over is not happening. Even the most hardcore conservatives are not interested in pushing a complete porn ban; porn is a useful tool of patriarchy that they also utilize. It gives them something to blame sexuality related problems on. They can use the women in porn as an example to be made of to women who aren't good wives. Conservative women can and also do the same; with the double whammy of not realizing their husbands are the ones visiting the "flithy whores" and propping up the industry in the first place.

Even the whole "LGBT content getting censored" is a bastardized concern from them as their concept of "LGBT content" includes furry porn, corrective raping women (as a kink of course! :3 ), and all sorts of things that s​hould be banned in the first place, as they are akin to CP and other such already banned content​.

I cannot imagine wasting so much energy over something not happening; but then again I'm not in a cult 💁‍♀️