How badly did I hurt my chances on a timed communications assessment?
I recently completed a writing/communications assessment for a Communications role at a law firm and would really appreciate some objective feedback.
I had 2.5 hours total, with a hard deadline at 1:30 p.m. I received the test at 11:01 a.m. and submitted at 1:27 p.m.
The assessment involved several different tasks, including:
Editing a short article and identifying legal/reputational/client-facing risks
Writing/adapting social media content
Creating a graphic
Writing a promotional LinkedIn post in French for a specific audience
Assessing business/brand considerations
The criteria emphasized attention to detail, editing/proofreading, professional judgment, social media, audience targeting, business judgment and reputational risk.
I think my substantive judgment throughout the exam was strong.
For the French task, I wrote a LinkedIn post aimed at employers. The structure/content was good, but I made a few mechanical errors, including “avocat principale” instead of “avocate principale” and two misspelled hashtags.
Overall, I made around 6–7 proofreading/mechanical errors across the assessment which I would have fixed if I had a few more minutes to do a final QA.
The other issue is that the instructions specifically said to use Track Changes. I started to make the edits directly and then added my risk comments/recommendations in a separate section. By the time I realized I was running close to the deadline and didn’t have time to redo everything in Track Changes.
My concern is that the role is writing-heavy, so I’m worried the proofreading errors and failure to use Track Changes could outweigh the fact that my substantive judgment was strong.
For context, French is also a strong asset for this particular hiring manager, and I did complete the French portion rather than skipping it.
How would you evaluate this? Would you see this as a candidate with strong communications/business judgment who needs better final QA, or would 6–7 errors + not using Track Changes be enough to reject someone at the assessment stage?
I’m looking for a brutally honest assessment, not reassurance.