The things you see on Ancestry trees…
The inaccuracy of some trees is incredible. Searched up a person I’ve been researching who appeared in only one other tree but mine. Which I thought, great, maybe they have some extra sources or research I’ve not seen yet.
This woman in question was born in 1824, Northumberland in England. Somehow, this tree managed to establish she was married at negative seven years old in 1817 in Manchester, and had managed to cross an entire ocean (whilst nonexistent) to have a daughter in 1818 at Pennsylvania. To finish it off, she was then baptised in 1829 at Yorkshire.
It’s my winner for the worst I’ve seen yet..