r/Indianlaw

​I recently had cataract surgery done for my mother at an eye hospital in Noida and subsequently submitted the documents for reimbursement via the Care Health insurance app. Out of the ₹15,000 claim, they only reimbursed about ₹2,000. Now, I have received a recovery notice from them claiming they paid that amount by mistake and are demanding the funds back, threatening legal action if I do not comply.

​To make matters worse, I am receiving repeated calls from the hospital stating that the insurance company failed to pay them ₹8,000 from the original cashless approval. Months after the surgery, the hospital is now demanding that I pay this outstanding balance.

​I am incredibly stressed and confused. As a patient, no one should have to go through this. It shouldn't be my responsibility to resolve disputes between the insurance company and the hospital. This is causing genuine mental harassment, and I am completely unsure of how to proceed.

​Any help or advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

Visited Sunny Trade Mall (New Atish Market) last night at 10:40 PM and got handed this slip by "Kasana Services". Please look at the absolute audacity of Rule 5 and Rule 7 combined:

Rule 5: "Parking only for 11.00 am to 11.00 pm no responsibility of vehicle."

Rule 7: "PARKING AT OWNER'S RISK."

So, let me get this straight:

During the day (11 AM - 11 PM), it's "Owner's Risk" (Rule 7). And the exact second the clock strikes 11:01 PM, they double-down and officially declare "No responsibility of vehicle" (Rule 5).

Why am I even paying the ₹10 fee? They’ve literally covered all their bases to make sure that whether it's day or night, if your bike gets scratched, stolen, or swallowed by a black hole, they can just point at this tiny yellow piece of paper and walk away.

The funniest part is that consumer courts in India have repeatedly ruled that these "Owner's Risk" clauses are completely illegal if you're paying a fee. But contractors keep printing them anyway just to bully people out of complaining.

Has anyone else encountered these double-liability-shield around Jaipur?

Does this capture the exact hypocrisy you were looking at?

My mother and us children have been facing physical and mental abuse from my father for a long time. We have written an application under the Domestic Violence Act for protection and maintenance, but we do not know the proper legal process or where to submit it first.

We are financially weak and cannot afford a private lawyer right now. We are looking for:

Free legal aid / lawyer

Someone who can guide us about the process

Advice about what steps to take urgently in Delhi

We are from Delhi.

I am attaching the application draft we prepared ourselves

Any genuine guidance or help would be appreciated. Thank you.

The incident, captured on video, highlights a serious lapse in courtroom decorum. Both the judiciary and members of the Bar are entrusted with upholding the dignity, discipline, and sanctity of the judicial institution, making such conduct deeply concerning.

SOURCE: https://x.com/i/status/2055698088745156746

Hello everyone!

I am conducting a research study on how educational exposure influences attitudes toward the LGBTQ community among Indian youth. The study is completely anonymous and intended purely for academic purposes.

If you are between 16–25 years old, I’d really appreciate 5 minutes of your time to fill out this form.

Google Form Link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScVMFUplduGXtzwCtQYT7OQKYPavaQMOqa6ssxoPsUwX3lbTA/viewform?usp=publish-editor

Thank you for contributing to this research!

After waiting more than 10 years for their dream homes, two homebuyers in Gurugram have finally scored a major victory against a builder accused of endless delays. Haryana RERA has ordered the developer of the Capital Gateway project in Sector 111 to pay 10.80% annual interest on the buyers’ money for the delayed possession. Each buyer had already paid over Rs 1.8 crore for their flats.

The case exposes the frustration many homebuyers face after investing their life savings into under-construction projects. The buyers claimed the builder kept delaying the project while also increasing the flat size without approval and demanding extra money. What made the case worse was that the builder reportedly did not even appear before HRERA despite repeated notices.

The authority came down strongly on the developer and said the project should have been delivered years ago. HRERA directed the builder to pay interest from June 2015 until possession is offered, clear all pending dues within 90 days, and also pay Rs 50,000 towards legal costs. The ruling is being seen as a strong warning to builders who continue to delay projects while buyers suffer financially and emotionally.

This order has once again raised a big question. Why are homebuyers forced to fight for years to get what was promised to them? Should stricter action be taken against delayed housing projects and non-compliant builders? Share your thoughts.

Published by Voxya as an initiative to help consumers in resolving consumer complaints.

Source: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/real-estate/big-win-for-homebuyers-after-10-year-wait-haryana-rera-directs-gurugram-based-builder-to-pay-10-80-interest/articleshow/130603457.cms

pls help ....it's serious

so case is like my uncel got in a relationship with a girl around 3-4 years they was mutually involved shared explicit images of each other but promblem is now that girl married with someone else and next day she called women helpline and trying to presurize my uncel to take her to our home point is she got married with some one else then nlw she wants to come to uncel saying that marriage of her was forced so what should be do right now complaint is not done just she went to police stattion and her dur ki sister took responsiblity and take her to home without fir now what should we do ( as she got married to another man my uncel doesnot want to accept her )

any solution?

While initiating criminal contempt proceedings against Kejriwal and other AAP leaders for allegedly orchestrating a social media campaign to vilify and intimidate the presiding judge, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma transferred the excise policy case to the Chief Justice for reassignment — clarifying that the transfer was not an acceptance of recusal, which she continues to reject.

https://theleaflet.in/leaflet-reports/if-judges-are-threatened-to-remain-silent-to-the-liking-of-politically-powerful-persons-justice-itself-may-become-a-casualty-justice-swarna-kanta-sharma-initiates-criminal-contempt-proceedings-against-kejriwal-sisodia-and-other-aap-leaders

A three-year-old girl was allegedly raped by a 57-year-old staff member inside a private school in west Delhi's Janakpuri area, police said on Friday.
The incident came to light on May 1 when the victim's mother filed a complaint at Janakpuri police station, alleging that her daughter was sexually assaulted during school hours by the accused.

According to the complaint, the child had gone to the school on April 30, the second day after her admission.

After returning home, she complained of pain. When questioned by her mother, the girl said that she was taken to an isolated area in the school, where the man allegedly assaulted her.
Based on the complaint, police registered a case under section 64(1) (punishment for rape) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Police said the child identified the accused, following which the 57-year-old school caretaker was arrested on May 1. He was later produced before a court and sent to judicial custody.

However, he was granted bail by a court in Dwaraka on May 7 despite strong opposition from the prosecution. Police said they are checking CCTV footage on the school premises.

Meanwhile, the girl's mother alleged that no proper action was taken immediately after the case was reported. She also said that a school teacher was involved and he was questioned during the police investigation.
She further alleged that the child and family were made to wait for several hours at the police station during the inquiry.

Meanwhile, Aam Aadmi Party leader Saurabh Bharadwaj, in a statement, strongly criticised the granting of bail to the 57-year-old caretaker.

He also echoed the mother's allegations, claiming that the *DCP West threatened the family members instead of cooperating with them.*

*"Imagine a child being admitted to nursery in a private school and returning home on the very first day, only for the parents to discover that a 57-year-old caretaker raped the child,"* he said.

However, police countered the allegations made by the mother and Bharadwaj.
A statement by the office of DCP (West) *Vichitra Veer* said the action was taken immediately after the girl was medically examined.
"During the investigation, the accused was arrested after identification by the victim on the same day, promptly. Statement of the victim was also recorded before the court, and relevant CCTV/DVR footage along with other exhibits were seized as per law," the statement said.

It said the investigation was conducted in a fair, professional and impartial manner based on scientific evidence, forensic examination, witnesses' statements and the merits of the case.

"Certain media reports alleging harassment or intimidation by police officials are false, baseless and contrary to the actual facts of the investigation.

The complainant and the girl were provided a comfortable, child-friendly environment during the inquiry proceedings and were called only for lawful inquiry and counselling purposes, considering the sensitivity of the matter," the statement read.

"DCP West has never met the parents of the victim, as alleged on the contrary," it read.

*The statement further said the detailed bail order passed by the court is being examined, and further legal remedies, as per law, are under consideration.*

Source: NDTV