r/hiringcafe

Internal job postings visible in HiringCafe

Internal job postings visible in HiringCafe

Hi, just wanted to point out that there're some companies like HSBC that use their avaiable to public webpage with modified url to post internal opportunities- these are not filtered out on Hiring Cafe but, as you can imagine, it's not really possible to apply for these positions. Would be awesome if the team manages to filter them out.

eg; https://mycareer.hsbc.com/en_GB/jobsforemployees/PipelineDetail?pipelineId=288602

u/krkkac1 — 10 hours ago

Best job search site needs vetting of jobs

Dear Hiring.cafe,

I know you are trying to beat Indeed and LinkedIn and that's great - everyone needs goals 😊

My problem with LinkedIn and more specifically Indeed is the onslaught of non-vetted, scammy job postings. We waste time filling out their applications and we waste time when they contact us. It's so bad that when a friend of my mine got a job offer (through hiring cafe btw) he still felt - is this real or a scam? Happily, it was real and I'm guessing the scammers have not found hiring.cafe yet.

So my first suggestion - please vet the jobs. Not sure how because I've even seen scammy websites - maybe check the WHOIS and make sure they are legit. IDK - y'all are the info geniuses.

Second, problem with Indeed and LinkedIn, I have been told that there are alot of companies who pay to get their job "seen" even though they are not truly hiring. I am told it is because they want to appear they are growing as a company, but they really don't have a job for anyone. I'm also suspicious that it's a weird kind of advertising for them. It just makes me angry because again we are wasting our time with a non-job. And I have small business friends who posted real jobs, for a decent salary and get no takers. They don't pay to "advertise" the job.

so my second suggestion - tell companies there needs to be a real job behind their "ad"

And then lastly, if you have any sway with the companies - job seekers are bogged down with applying for ONE job. They ask for a resume, a cover letter AND to fill out their application (same info on your resume but we still need to fill it out) sometimes with essays. It only allows us to apply to 1 maybe 2 applications a day because it takes hours.

I am not a job seeker, but my kids and nieces and nephews are - and they all have the same complaints. I wish I could send them to an employment agency where they would find the job for you. the computerized job search was revolutionary when it came out but today - well it sucks. There is a thing about too much.

I'm hoping hiring.cafe will be better. Good Luck! 😊

u/BroadcastingSunny — 19 hours ago
▲ 6 r/hiringcafe+1 crossposts

HireRight background check query

Hi everyone,

I’m currently going through a HireRight background check for a Risk Operations Analyst role at a large financial services company in the UK, and I’m hoping someone with HireRight or HR experience can share their thoughts.

One of my previous work experiences is more complicated than a standard employment, and I’m worried about how it might be reported.

Here’s the timeline:

* Dec 2023: Started on a trial basis.
* Feb 2024: Signed a 6-month employment contract with one company owned by the business owner. My title at that time was Business Development Manager.
* May 2024: Transferred to another company owned by the same owner as Business Support Manager. My UK Skilled Worker sponsorship (CoS), payslip and P45 are all under Ginger Boost with the Business Support Manager title.
* Aug 2024: Returned to China and my formal employment with Ginger Boost ended.
* From Oct 2024: I continued supporting the same business, but through another company owned by the same owner in China. (The owner owns many small companies but all worked together)

This is where things become confusing.

Although the legal entity changed after I returned to China, in practice it felt like the same business:

* same owner
* same management team
* many of the same colleagues
* same WeChat and WhatsApp work groups
* similar day-to-day responsibilities

Because of that, I honestly viewed it as one continuous professional engagement when I prepared my CV.

Recently, my former employer told me that the work after I returned to China should not be considered employment with Ginger Boost, but rather project work through another company.To be clear, I’m not trying to justify fake experience. My concern is that what I considered a continuous engagement across the same owner and integrated business may not match the legal employment records of one specific entity. Will it influence my offer and should I proactively inform the new company 😭

I’d really appreciate hearing from anyone who’s been through HireRight, works in HR, or has dealt with similar situations. Thanks in advance!

reddit.com
u/Particular-Use-2330 — 1 day ago

HC did it again

Proud to say i was here when a couple of redditors decided to start HC. Been committed to HC ever since. Was hoping to have a success story and I finally do.

Laid off May 2025, accepted a low paying job Sept 2025 ( not HC).

I figured I would keep looking for a job with actual benefits and better pay and exclusively used HC. Found 2 job posting June 15. Dusted off my resume and applied June 16, June 17 had interviews set up for week of June 22-26.

I was offered both positions. I chose the one that had great benefits and was double my current salary. I start July 20. I am so glad i was lucky enough and spending way too much time on reddit and saw a post by Ali on another sub about starting this job board.

Its a great resource, no noise, and is effective.

Thank You u/hiringcafeteam and u/alimir1 u/hamed_n

reddit.com
u/susu56 — 3 days ago

Any success story outside the US?

Hi! I recently found Hiring Cafe and I am amazed by it. It really is so much better than LinkedIn and others.

Just one problem: I get the feeling that the platform is too US-centered, and this is kind of limiting for people like me living in Europe or looking to work from anywhere. Even most remote jobs require US location.

I am aware I can filter and look for jobs in Europe, I am doing that and applying to the relevant results. But it doesn't seem to be as fluid and comprehensive...

So I was just wondering if anyone managed to get a job through HC in a country outside the US or a job that had no relationship to the US whatsoever.

Looking forward to hearing inspiring testimonies 🤞🏻

reddit.com
u/Eva-Lee — 3 days ago

Got a job through HC

Appreciate HC for making my ability to find a new job the easiest it’s ever been.

Was working a role at a company for a few years and decided I wanted something else. Started very lightly searching in October and actually and got a couple interviews in the fall. I got serious and started applying everyday only through HC starting in January and got probably a dozen interviews and screenings.

Tracker says I applied to 223 jobs total but idk how far that ranges. I think I was lightly using HC last summer as well.

Anyway, I had a bunch of recruiters reach out through LinkedIn and while I got a few interviews, they lead nowhere. I got a ton more from interviews and screenings through HC.

Jan and Feb were hot for jobs in finance and then March and April were extremely dry.

I think the company I got my new job with actually posted in March though.

Settings: I tried to add as many keywords pertaining to my job as possible and filtered with brand new jobs, so 24hr posts. I mainly searched for jobs in my current city whilst having a separate filter for a different city I was interested in. I think the most important thing was that the experience filter for jobs were accurate for me.

I applied everyday at work and refreshed 2 to 3 times a day to be one of the first to apply. I think I got most responses for jobs I was at least top 20 applicants in.

The most important part is the interview tho. You need to have good interviewing skills. I tend to over think stuff and it raises my anxiety and makes my interviews bad. But at some point I just figured that the most important thing was that the people liked you and you can communicate your story well and your attributes clearly. So I stopped trying to jam every little piece of experience into my brain and stopped freaking myself out about “what if they ask this” and just went in with an even level of relaxation and confidence. This is when my interviews were the best.

Idk how I would’ve gotten a job through indeed or LinkedIn because they suck. All the jobs posted just seem like bot postings or 100 people have already applied.

Very grateful for HC. Im at a better company with better pay and a I don’t go into the office everyday.

reddit.com
u/TeannaTrumpStan2 — 4 days ago

How I supported hiringcafe

I saw another job board yesterday and upon taking a closer look. It is scraping from glassdoor, Dice and other top players. Since scraping other people job board clearly violates ToS, I quickly email inform those players. I hope they get Cease and Decease soon.

reddit.com
u/MoneyTomato7711 — 3 days ago

Feature Request: Ability to directly add requirements and tools from listings to filters

Context: I have a very broad skillset and I do not have a specific role I am looking for. I want to be able to filter out jobs based on skills/certifications/tools/etc I do or don't have. What I want to see is all the jobs I am potentially qualified for, but may have never thought of seeking out.

The why: The way I currently use the tool is to set my area and just go through ALL the listings. I tried to filter for specific things, but it was either too limiting or too time consuming. It would be quite natural for me to see a listing for, say, a nurse position that requires a nursing license, toggle/dropdown to set the license to NO and have all jobs that require it filtered out from my search. This way, I don't have to think of what's out there, but just go through a list . Cognitively, it is much less draining to go through a given list than it is to create one. It is also much simpler to click on something than add it to a complex boolean expression(which are no doubt hard for non-tech people).

Current state: Currently, I can manually do this in the filters either through drop downs or through the boolean syntax.

The Issue: It is pain. Right now this needs to be done proactively, which means I have to think of all the things I'd like to exclude or include. I see this being trivial for someone who is specialized in a particular area, but for me this is neverending.

Proposed Solution: Make it passive. Make it a natural part of the process, instead a separate laborious step.

Instead of listing tools and requirements as plaintext lists in the listings, add a small state marker( icon dropdown? ) besides each tool/requirement. There should be 3 states: {Yes, No, Unknown} (✅❌❔). All items should start out as unknown. As the user goes through the listings, they can directly toggle the state for any item. This should automatically update the filters, so that no job that contains an item marked as No will be shown. Listings with Yes items should be prioritized in the list.

I am hesitant to give specific implementation suggestions, as I can't quite discern what your backend looks like. If you already have a DB of individual skills, you could simply add it as a new column, if you just insert the boolean expression into some sort of sql statement(or something), you can just programmatically add a clause to the expression when a user sets a state to a new skill and modify it if the state changes. I think it would make sense for Unknown to be represented as an absence of clause. The user should be able to see and modify these manually, of course, but that's already available.

Additional benefit: This could help people passively build their skills/tools inventory that they could use for resumes etc.

reddit.com
u/mystery_axolotl — 3 days ago

Can you search in the applied field for a job?

Is it possible to either do or add the feature to be able to search for a job you applied to in the applied fields. Would make updating the status much easier.

reddit.com
u/AgitatedNarwhal5 — 4 days ago

hiringcafe.com help!

Hey everyone!

New mod at HiringCafe here, wanted to follow up on a previous post, we recently bought the domain hiringcafe.com (it just redirects to hiring.cafe, it isn't a new acquisition or anything), and wanted to make sure there are no existing issues getting there. Would you please be willing to visit the website and confirm you can visit now without problems?

Thanks!

reddit.com
u/Small-Living3695 — 6 days ago
▲ 25 r/hiringcafe+29 crossposts

I Tried ChatGPT to Fix My Resume. Here’s Why It Missed the Point.

Comparing https://resume.zoevera.com against https://chatgpt.com

And what a purpose-built ATS checker caught that GPT-4 didn’t.

Let me be upfront: I use ChatGPT for everything. Code reviews, draft emails, explaining stack traces at 2am. It’s genuinely useful. So when I needed to tailor my resume for a senior backend role, my first instinct was to open a chat window.

That was three weeks ago. Here’s what I learned.

What ChatGPT actually does well

Ask ChatGPT to “improve my resume” and it will:

  • Clean up passive voice (“responsible for” → “led”)
  • Suggest stronger action verbs
  • Add structure and formatting consistency
  • Rewrite vague bullets into something that sounds more impressive

For general writing quality, it’s genuinely good. If your resume reads like it was written by someone who hasn’t slept in 48 hours, ChatGPT will fix that.

What ChatGPT fundamentally cannot do

Here’s the problem: ChatGPT doesn’t know what job you’re applying for.

You can paste the job description into the prompt, sure. But there’s no mechanism for it to:

  1. Score your resume against that specific JD — it has no concept of a match percentage
  2. Identify which keywords are present vs. missing — it will suggest improvements but won’t systematically audit keyword coverage
  3. Know how Applicant Tracking Systems parse text — it will rewrite content without knowing whether an ATS will ever see it

ATS filters work on keyword frequency and placement. A resume that reads beautifully to a human can score 40% on an ATS if the right terms aren’t in the right sections. ChatGPT optimizes for human readers. ATS systems are not human readers.

I ran a test. Same resume, same job description (Backend Engineer, Node.js/AWS stack). I gave ChatGPT the full JD and asked it to optimize my resume for ATS.

The output was well-written. It added “microservices” and “REST APIs” in a few places. But it missed:

  • “AWS Lambda” — mentioned 4 times in the JD, absent from my resume after the rewrite
  • “CI/CD pipeline” — appeared in the required skills section, never added
  • The Projects section — ChatGPT rewrote my experience bullets but left the Projects section untouched, which is where most of my relevant backend work lived

When I ran the same resume through resume.zoevera.com, it flagged all three gaps explicitly, with section-level attribution. The ATS match score went from 54% to 81% after applying the suggested changes.

The core difference: diagnostic vs. generative

ChatGPT is a generative tool. It produces new text. It’s very good at that.

An ATS checker is a diagnostic tool first. It measures the gap between your resume and a specific job description, then tells you exactly what’s missing. The rewrite comes second — and it’s grounded in what was actually identified as absent, not what the model thinks sounds better.

This distinction matters because:

ChatGPT hallucinates improvements. It will add metrics you never achieved (“improved system performance by 35%”), use terminology that
sounds right but wasn’t in the JD, and rewrite bullets that didn’t need rewriting while leaving critical gaps untouched. Every line needsfact-checking.

A purpose-built tool works from the actual gap. The keywords it adds are the ones the JD asked for. The sections it flags are the ones the ATS will score. The output is closer to submission-ready.

A practical workflow

These tools aren’t mutually exclusive. The best result I got came from using both in sequence:

  1. ATS checker first: identify the keyword gaps and get a scored rewrite that closes them
  2. ChatGPT second: use it to polish tone, tighten sentences, and clean up anything that sounds mechanical

The ATS checker handles precision. ChatGPT handles prose quality. Neither does both well alone.

The cost argument

ChatGPT Plus is $20/month. If you’re actively job searching, that’s a fixed overhead whether you use it or not.

Most people search for jobs in windows — a few weeks of active applications, then nothing for months. A per-session model makes more
sense: pay when you need it, nothing when you don’t. ZoeVera’s pricing works that way — free analysis, one-time payment for the full
rewrite, no subscription.

For a developer audience specifically: if you’re applying to 10–15 roles over two weeks, you’re not optimizing resumes 365 days a year. The math on a monthly subscription doesn’t work.

What I’d actually recommend

  • If you just need better writing: ChatGPT is fine and you already have it
  • If you’re applying to roles where ATS filtering is real (any company using Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS): use a dedicated ATS checker first, then polish with ChatGPT
  • If you’re a developer and haven’t thought about this: your resume probably uses technical jargon that means something to you and nothing to an ATS keyword parser. “Built scalable backend” is not the same as “developed microservices architecture using Node.js and AWS ambda” — even if the underlying work is identical

The ATS doesn’t know what you meant. It only knows what you wrote.

Tested against a real Backend Engineer job description. Tools used: ChatGPT GPT-4o, https://resume.zoevera.com. June 2026.

u/Enough_Charge2845 — 6 days ago

Why dont I see everything for 1 company?

Say I start with a clean slate, and am looking at Nvidia. Only set to the past 24 hours and in the United States. I should be seeing up to 8 positions. Looking at the company page within Hiring Cafe, there should be 5. But in the search there is only 2.

Any reason for this? Am I missing out? How can I see them all?

u/Reasonable-Park4603 — 7 days ago

Resume x AI search is live (BETA)

Our AI search can now read your resume!!!

Please let us know your feedback? This is a preview feature and we will continue will continue to improve it this week based on your feedback

Note: This is a preview feature available in the USA only

reddit.com
u/hamed_n — 8 days ago

Thank you, thank you, thank you

After 2 years of endlessly searching and applying on Indeed and LinkedIn, in just a month using Hiring Café I had 3 successful interview processes and 2 solid offers from which I was able to negotiate and choose the best fit for me. Thank you to the Hiring Café team, I'm spreading the word about you as much as possible to every one I can because this does feel like a true upgrade when it comes to searching and applying for jobs.

reddit.com
u/Desperate-Quantity86 — 8 days ago

Moving forward

I’ll share. I got laid off in January and I’ve been looking for work, submitting applications for what look like really great jobs but zero bites. In the last couple of months, I’ve been using HC and applied to numerous jobs. I have gotten responses/interviews from two, found solely through HC. Not sure I would have found them otherwise. Been alternating communication with the two companies. Pretty sure I’m going to get a freelance offer with one, but I’m hoping for an offer with the other one (it’s salaried). I think the freelance one can keep me going until I get something more solid. Feel like I’m in a good place though!

reddit.com
u/QuestionableRoutine — 7 days ago

Cannot save or update job search anymore?

I'm trying to modify and then save an existing/saved job search from the job search page. There used to be a button there which made updating/saving a search straightforward. That button is missing now. Is this a temporary glitch? Am I missing something?

reddit.com
u/abanicodegaudi — 7 days ago