Bro is asking, “If Bhagat Singh was hanged, were other people afraid?” Yes. Your Savarkar was busy writing mercy petitions.

okay this is long, sorry in advance.

I went down a rabbit hole this week and i think it's worth sharing.

Background: I kept noticing some new subreddits blowing up fast with extremely divisive political content. every now and then, I would see comments like "IT cell" or "a bot" and so on.

So I spent about a week pulling public data. to be clear about scale:

• ~500+ posts and ~6,000 comments from one sub
• plus the full post/comment history of the ~100 most active accounts
• that's well over 10k posts/comments

The sub I looked at is `r/RealTeensIndia`. naming it on purpose so you can verify, and correct me if my analysis was wrong anywhere.

It was basically dormant, then someone flipped a switch.

Made in nov 2025. For the first ~4.5 months it mostly did single digits per week. Then mid-april 2026 it just takes off, and it's at 234k weekly visitors now. Usually real communities grow gradually - here it was dead for months and then just flipped. It could very well be that it got viral and hence the exponential growth, but the chances of that seems a bit low. Anyway let's proceed further.

One account posts a fifth of the entire sub.

• in my sample, one account wrote 21% of all posts
• the top 10 accounts wrote 41% between them
• and that account isn't new. it's an old profile from 2022 that posted once, went quiet for nearly 4 years, and then woke up 6 days after this sub got created

That's the trick btw, they use old dormant accounts, so "check the cake day, it's new" doesn't catch them. Not naming the account, for obvious reasons.

The framing is the whole game.

~31% of that account's posts are just questions. "what do you guys think about this?" usually stuck to some outrage clip (including MEMRI-TV clips, if you know those). The flavours of the posts are simple - outrage clips against muslims, against reservation, or anything which is against the current government.

It basically never gives an opinion. it just picks the topic and lets everyone fight. And in between the political stuff, it posts quotes, cat videos, poetry, normal teen filler, so the sub feels like a real hangout.

The actual mechanic is broadcasting.

The same post, exact same title, fired into a fixed list of subs, over and over. one account did this 50+ times. e.g. the line "why hesitating to speak against congress" went into 7 different subs. the same content keeps landing across a similar cluster of subs:

• r/indiadiscussion
• r/unfilteredindia
• r/India_Bharat_
• r/IndiaPulse
• r/Kolkatacity
• r/indianmemer
• r/HindutvaRises
• and some other subs

One account posted the same title 9 times in 18 minutes. And when you go through the cluster of these subreddits, you'll obviously get the flavour of the content, and obviously you'll be able see through it.

It's a crew, not one account.

• ~8 of the top posters first showed up in the same 5-week window (mid-March to late-April 2026), right as the sub took off
• Three of them started within the same 72 hours: 29, 30, 31 March
• A lot of them use Reddit's default auto-generated usernames, the Adjective-Noun-4digits format (eg - Hidden_name_2264, No-Doxxing2490 - obviously these are just indicative names and not the real IDs :p )

The crowd, though, is real - and I tried hard to prove it wasn't.

Went into the comments expecting bots and found the opposite:

• ~2,000 different real people commenting
• top 10 commenters were only 9% of all comments

so the talking is spread across a genuine crowd, not a handful of accounts.

I didn't stop there though. there's a trick called a "reply ring", where the same small group of accounts keeps showing up in the same threads, upvoting and agreeing with each other, to fake a conversation and make it look like everyone's already on one side.

Basically the comments version of the broadcasting trick. so i checked for it: for every thread, i listed who commented, then counted which accounts kept turning up together.

there was no ring:

• the only account that showed up "with everyone" was the automod (which is supposed to)
• real users maxed out at like 3-4 shared threads each, which is basically coincidence across ~2,000 people

so the commenters really seem independent, unless they have made a really sophisticated ring with new accounts and bots for comments to instigate more comments but also act in a measured way to mimic human activity - Now I can't prove that as of now - so I will take the crowd as real.

So the fake part isn't the audience, it's the feed. a handful of accounts decide what gets posted and how it's worded, and thousands of real people show up and argue and upvote and make it feel like this is just what everyone thinks. They pick the topic which would prompt outrage and let the crowd do the rest.

Stuff i checked that did NOT pan out

(because i don't want to sound like a conspiracy guy)

• I thought maybe all these subs share one owner. couldn't find that, different founders
• a few accounts i first flagged turned out to be real cricket fans and exam-prep students. the method has false positives, telling you the misses too

What i can't prove

Who's behind it or who's paying. You cannot prove that from the outside. It's also why i'm not naming any accounts, some of these could be actual teenagers and i'm not about to point a mob at a kid.

if you do check, reply with what you find. and if i got something wrong, show me (seriously), i'd rather get corrected than be confidently wrong.

PS: also, before anyone asks, yeah i saw signs of the same kind of coordinated stuff from the other side of the aisle too. didn't get into it here yet. if people want i'll dig into that next. Or I could dig deeper and investigate the same side from the aged-account marketplace angle.

PPS: full disclosure: I make research-heavy documentary videos on youtube, but this post IS NOT A PROMOTION for one - I haven't even made a video about this yet. I went down this rabbit hole and did the analysis independently and posted it here because I wanted other people to know about this and also poke holes in it.

You: "Hey, unemployment is spiking, inflation is eating through savings, and air quality is literally dissolving our lungs."

Them: "AH BUT HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THAT IN 1242 AD OUR ANCESTORS DISCOVERED THE CONCEPT OF MOLECULAR ASTROPHYSICS WHILE WEAVING COTTON?"

Brother, it is 2026. My landlord does not accept payment in Chola dynasty maritime trade glory points.

Every single debate follows the exact same script. You bring up a structural crisis happening today, and within three minutes they start crying about what some king did six hundred years ago. "Oh, you want better public healthcare? Well, what about the medieval period? Do you know who destroyed which temple in 1350? Checkmate, leftist."

It is absolute brain rot. Yes, history is neat. Read a book, visit a museum, learn from it so we do not repeat the worst parts. But making ancient history your entire personality because your present offers nothing to brag about is wild. You cannot run a country on "We used to be Vishwaguru." Great! We were great! Now can we please figure out why the roads wash away after twenty minutes of mild drizzle?

Imagine applying this logic anywhere else in life:

Boss: "You are three hours late for work and you haven’t submitted the report." You: "Okay but in 2018 I was employee of the month, so why are you attacking my glorious heritage?"

Stop using the Middle Ages as a shield against basic accountability. History is a reference guide, not a substitute for a functional economy.