The Position I Don’t Understand
Disclaimer: I am not a server; I’m in healthcare.
First of all, good morning to all of you; I hope that we can engage in a civil discussion on this one.
I’d also say that there are positions against tipping that I do understand: I understand that some people resent the (real or perceived) social pressure of tipping; I also understand that some people resent servers who have an, ‘Entitled attitude.’ Now, as to the last part, I definitely believe that doesn’t reflect the majority of servers, I also think some people might be extrapolating one, or a few, experiences to the entire server population…but it’s not really for me to argue against someone’s perception; we all perceive things differently.
The position I don’t understand is this: We all know that if a restaurant were to eliminate tipping and pay servers directly, by which, I mean, you are ABSOLUTELY not allowed to tip-servers would make less money.
Now, some people speak as though servers who wouldn’t want this are entitled; how is it entitled, though, to not want to make less money for doing the same job?
But, that’s actually minor.
What really confuses me is the people who decry serving as an entry-level job and actively attack servers on the basis of they make too much money. Servers will (correctly) point out that they don’t always make a ton, and will point to averages, to which the anti-tippers will counter that there are unclaimed tips not being accounted for.
Even that is basically fine.
The position that I REALLY don’t understand, however, is when servers are attacked based on not being perceived as worth what they’re making. It’s almost as if people are looking at what servers do and saying, “That job shouldn’t pay that much.”
Now, even if those people were right (given that it’s a subjective opinion), how is this, in any way, some kind of grave injustice? It almost comes off as either contempt or jealousy, but couldn’t people just try to become servers, if they wanted, were they jealous?
And, if we’re going to attack people on the premise that they make more than they’re worth, wouldn’t CEO’s and other corporate types, who sit in boardrooms and **** each other off all day, and also have golden parachutes even if they are ousted, be a better target?
So, that’s the position that I don’t understand and, I think, actually worsens the anti-tipping side’s overall position. It’s like, even if servers were undeserving…oh my God, they’re making (likely lower-middle) middle-class income for work that some don’t consider a middle-class job—-who gives a crap? I just think that any position that advocates for, “This category of workers should have less earnings than they currently do,” is going to be a non-starter for a lot of people.
So, can anyone who has actual animosity towards servers for making what they make explain why they feel that is a meritorious position?