u/BichonFriseLover

I recognise it existed in the past. I do not recognise that it exists today.

Sociologist Raewyn Connell explained how the common man benefit from the patriarchy through “patriarchal dividends” meaning presumed professional competence, freedom from the disproportionate burden of uncompensated domestic labour, and freedom of movement in public spaces.

Historically these things are not what defined a patriarchy. When an actual patriarchy existed women couldn’t work, have their own bank account, get an education and so forth.

The “patriachal dividends” that the average man receive aren’t from a systematic oppression. It’s people entering agreements with obligations that they do not like.

If you feel like you do more around the house, and you’re unhappy: Leave.

If your employer views you as stupid: Leave.

The patriarchy is an invisible bogey-man for women that like to feel bad about themselves.

I recently found this community and I’m excited to engage!

Some background information about myself: I used to be very pro-socialism when I was younger. Partially because I was raised in Scandinavia.

I enrolled law school, and was taught a lot about contracts, insolvency, and employment.

I’m not gonna lie it changed my political beliefs a lot, and I became much more moderate. I’m neither pro capitalism nor pro socialism.

This now brings me to my question.

The job market is made up of contracts. As an employee I’m obligated to give up my knowledge and time in return for a wage.

In a socialist utopia, why would I give up my knowledge and time (my obligations) if I didn’t have to, and I could still receive my wage? What would my incentive be?

No one likes working, so why would I work?

Thanks in advance for answers.

Heard it’s a chill practice.

Jeg må have levet under en sten. Jeg læser på universitetet og skal om et par år ud på arbejdsmarkedet. Jeg vidste slet ikke at ulønnet overarbejde var; forventet og accepteret i mange brancher.

Hvis man arbejder 45 timer, men kun bliver betalt for 37 timer har man samtykket til — lidt polemisk sagt — at være slave.

De resterende 8 timer den uge er slave-arbejde. Hvorfor fanden ville man skrive under på det?

If [blank] is an immediate disqualifying factor then the person at hand views the trait as something negative.

In public dating discourse with women and blue pillers this concept seems very hard to understand. In the sentence above you can exchange the [blank] with a lot of different variables for example: Money, height, bisexuality, political beliefs etc.

I’ll give an example with bisexuality, but this could be a multitude of other variables.

Woman: “I can’t date someone who is bisexual”

BichonFriseLover: “Well, if their sexual orientation [or blank] is their only disqualifying factor then surely you must view their sexual orientation as something negative?”

Woman: “No I don’t view it as something negative, it’s just my preference”.

Now I know someone is gonna comment “men and red pillers do this too”, but I must admit I don’t see it. In almost all scenarios red pillers usually double down: “Yes I do think my disqualifying factor is because I view it as something negative”

Howdy,

Jeg søger anbefalinger til gode restauranter hvor man kan få sig tre-retters menuer til under 400kr (inkl. drikkevarer).

Det ville være et kæmpe plus hvis drikkevarerne var en rimelig pris.

Jeg har aldrig været typen, der tog særlig meget ud og spise, men det ville jeg gerne ændre nu hvor jeg er blevet ældre😊

For some reason there is a shit-ton of old (35+), maybe married, people with and without kids, trying to comment on dating today for young people.

With all due respect you have no clue. In your “hay day” the newest piece of technology was a blackberry.

Things like dating apps, social media, how young people interact with each other, is completely different today compared to 1998. The advice a lot of users give out is quite frankly worthless.

I don’t give advice on dating someone with kids because I have no clue what that’s like.

For some reason however, old people are really comfortable giving advice to the younger generation when dating today is nothing like it was in the past.

Maybe this is a Reddit take, but on this subreddit there is a notion that women do not care about body-count.

I completely disagree.

Straight women would generally be disgusted if they found out their “straight” partner previously had intercourse with a lot of different men.

When women say things like “past don’t matter” they only think about it in the narrative that suits them. Most women would feel violated if their “straight” partner had sexual escapes with other men and they did not disclose it.

Therefore women do care about their partners sexual past.

Nu håber jeg ikke på at jeg træder på tær, men hele jobbeskrivelsen lyder falsk.

Jeg tænker særligt på konsulenter der er uddannet cand.merc.et.eller.andet.fis, der arbejder hos McKinsey eller BCG.

Hvad fanden får i dagen til at gå med?

Min forestilling er klienten har et ønske om at deres overskud skal stige og så får klienten en powerpoint præsentation hvor de får at vide de skal “arbejde strategisk med en holistisk optimering af de interne arbejdsprocesser gennem tværgående synergiskabelse, datadrevet governance og agil implementering af skalerbare best practices, så vi sikrer en bæredygtig værdirealisering på tværs af organisationens operationelle berøringsflader”.

Efter præsentationen sender konsulenten en regning på 40.000 kr.

The claim for this post is in the title.

What is considered a “clean” home is completely arbitrary.

Women generally have a higher threshold for what they consider “clean”. That’s why women are to blame for doing more house work.

Men’s tolerance is compared to women, lower on average. You clean when things are dirty. It takes significantly less for women to find things dirty which is why they clean a lot more frequently.

That’s not men’s fault. You don’t choose at what point you find things dirty or clean. It’s completely arbitrary.

Women are essentially taking on more work because they are cleaner, and then they blame men for not helping out. It doesn’t make sense.

Semi-gammel artikel, men jeg havde ikke set andre på denne subreddit lave et opslag om nyhederne.

Artiklens resumé: Danske vækstvirksomheder får fra 1. juli 2026 et markant stærkere værktøj til at tiltrække og fastholde talent. Det hidtidige loft over skattebegunstigede medarbejderaktier fjernes, og langt flere virksomheder får adgang til de attraktive § 7 P-regler. Resultatet er større fleksibilitet, færre administrative barrierer og nye muligheder for at belønne medarbejdere med en andel i virksomhedens fremtidige værdiskabelse.

When it comes to sex women control the grey area. Women do not want direct language meaning men directly asking for consent.

I saw a video of a guy who sent a voice note to a girl he had been on one date with where he expressed he wanted a sexual relationship, and if she didn’t want that he would be wasting time.

Previously on the first date he had asked the woman and she answered “I don’t know”. Women in the comment section flooded the post with “you’re coercing her”, “if it’s not an enthusiastic yes it’s a no”.

This made me ponder. If you make your intentions clear, you’re coercing women. They like to be passive and indirect. You cannot ask for consent up front. They want the grey area.

I’m not saying his approach was good, and it’s not something I would ever do, but I must admit I was baffled by the reception of asking for consent up front being interpreted as “coercion” and “attempt to rape”.

Pænt goddag,

Jeg kan huske der var en der postede et link i en kommentar til en side hvor man kunne browse andelsboliger.

Jeg tror den hed andelsboligsiden, men når jeg slår det op kommer intet frem. Nogen der ved hvad jeg taler om?

Jeg er universitetsstuderende og har et studierelevant deltidsjob på 15 timer ved siden af.

Siden jeg fik sommerferie i start juni har jeg arbejdet fuldtid hver uge. Jeg synes jeg kun lever for weekenderne og det har fået mig til at tænke på om det er sådan mit liv kommer til at se ud når jeg er færdig.

Jeg stiller et oprigtigt spørgsmål. Det kan være der er en med en cand.merc-et-eller-andet, der kan berige mig med deres viden.

And if so who is the biggest artist that has performed at your firms annual party?