Why does Avestan sound so “incomplete” compared with Vedic Sanskrit, despite the two being closely related? Or explain me the evolution of both the languages, please.
I’ve noticed that Avestan sounds strangely incomplete or broken whereas Vedic Sanskrit sounds much more phonetically rich and developed.
I’m aware that this is subjective and that describing one natural language as “incomplete” isn't linguistically accurate. I’m specifically interested in the phonological/phonetic reasons behind this perception.
Let me give an example of Yasna 28:5 to explain my perspective:
Avesta (original) -
Ašā kat θβā darəsānī, manascā vohū vaēdəmnō.
Gātūmcā ahurāi, sēvištāi sraošəm mazdāi.
Anā māθrā mazištəm, vāurōimaidī xrafstrā hizvā.
Vedic Sanskrit (its equivalent) -
Ṛta kat tvā darśāni, manaś ca vásu vedamānaḥ.
Gātúṃ ca ásurāya, śáviṣṭhāya śróṣam médhase.
Anéna mántrā máhiṣṭham, vāvṛmahi krapstrā́ jihváyā.
Some points I noted:
The word, xrafstrā or krapstrā́, is in Avestan. I do not know where it is used in the Vedas.
The ṛ developed differently in Avesta, while it is the same in Sanskrit from PIE’s r̥: ṛ-ta & a-ša.
Tvā (in accusative, "you") becomes θβā. Same but still so much different.
Or simply putting,
I've been listening to a lot of Yasnas these days from YT and dr. Ramiyar Karanjia’s website, but all of those recitations sound phonetically "irregular and ugly [can’t describe well enough 🥀]" to my ears.