u/CSAS-D

Aston Martin blocked me on twitter because I called them out. Imagine being so insecure, that you block someone because they call you out for being so ass. A two time world champion- one of the Greatest to ever do it- is permanently attached at the back of the grid. Stroll has completely given up. For a team with billions of pounds, not even being able to finish a single race is so embarassing. They are worse than marussia and caterham.

I have never in my life seen a team as incompetent, and as insecure as astoj martin.

Not only is the strategy team half asleep when they have the (rare) chance of achieving something, but somehow they manage to make some of the dumbest errors and can't even plan for basic logistics. Imagine having to take engine penalties twice, then having the new engine have quality control issues. Imagine being unsure if the upgrades can even arrive at the same time for both drivers. Aston does not progress through practice sessions, they get worse as the sessions increase.

Aston does not have a performance ceiling, they have a performance basement.

Don't even get me started on honda. Those incompetent asses have wasted the aduo on an upgrade that simply does not even work, when they could have invested in 2027. This season is a writeoff anyways.

Astons car is green because it is eco friendly. Do you know why? It is because they are so eco friendly that they only spend one set of tyres in the race because they never manage to go past the first pitstop window. The strategy team spends the whole race sitting idle, then select the worst option somehow.

They spent the first half of the year collecting so much data, that the data could move an elephant. They don't have fp/quali/race, they have fp/fp/fp.

The team has more technical directors than overtakes.

Earlier they had mike crack talking as if they were on to something, but they stopped that as well. Cowell does not know why he joined. He was supposed to deal with the engine. What has he done? Not even he himself knows.

Every single one of their social media posts reads like a LinkedIn post.

They are so slow, alonsos go karts would probably go faster.

I am convinced that the whole team is a money laundering scheme.

I am done with this shit. It is an open secret that 90% of aston fans are alonso fans. The second alonso retires, the team will earn less money than the points they have earned in Monaco.

Really impressed with the teamz beautiful job from honda. Adrian newey you are the goat 💪💪💪💪💪💪💪

im a prospective student and wanna clarify some things- preferably in dms

https://youtu.be/ErNFjubJLLc

The Kefine Loric ($30) is a warm, forgiving all-rounder with standout spatial qualities, held back only by a polite treble and a shallow nozzle lip.

• Bass: Deep sub-bass and punchy mid-bass with solid definition; fun for hip-hop and electronic tracks without muddying the mix.
• Mids & Vocals: Forward and full-bodied, though aggressive upper mids can border on shouty at high volumes.
• Treble: Smooth, relaxed, and non-fatiguing, but lacks top-end bite and sparkle (benefits from a small high-shelf EQ boost).
• Technicalities: Class-leading soundstage and precise imaging, though busy tracks reveal average detail retrieval and separation.
• Build & Fit: Lightweight and comfortable, but the shallow nozzle lip can cause some aftermarket eartips to slip off.

Please give me any additional feedback you have about this video.

https://preview.redd.it/9r67hiq0rnlh1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=10f86e5758554f93ae4b9f52c7f30241428a3492

This is my first IEM review ever, please let me know what you think.

https://youtu.be/ErNFjubJLLc

General Impressions:

The Kefine Loric ($30) is a warm, forgiving all-rounder with standout spatial qualities, held back only by a polite treble and a shallow nozzle lip.

• Bass: Deep sub-bass and punchy mid-bass with solid definition; fun for hip-hop and electronic tracks without muddying the mix.
• Mids & Vocals: Forward and full-bodied, though aggressive upper mids can border on shouty at high volumes.
• Treble: Smooth, relaxed, and non-fatiguing, but lacks top-end bite and sparkle (benefits from a small high-shelf EQ boost).
• Technicalities: Class-leading soundstage and precise imaging, though busy tracks reveal average detail retrieval and separation.
• Build & Fit: Lightweight and comfortable, but the shallow nozzle lip can cause some aftermarket eartips to slip off.

https://preview.redd.it/iazl7xn3rnlh1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=a89bd6707117e6641e17b8ada362ccbe60752da6

https://preview.redd.it/kfj9rxwhrchh1.png?width=3014&format=png&auto=webp&s=dc078ea9894f527713a0e087894b04828531e0d4

The order is stuck like this, their email says that they only deal with US shipments despite me contacting the correct email id, their tracking is broken and website is ass

Hey! Motivated by Aston Martin's upgrade, I have decided to start doing this.

Alonso had the 11th fastest S1, 10th fastest S2 and S3. Stroll had the 17th, 13th and 14th fastest sectors respectively. Not to mention Alonso was as quick as gasly in his final stint with roughly equal tyres.

Against Bortoleto on identical-age softs over L2–13, Alonso was virtually level overall—only 0.049s per lap slower—but the distribution was revealing: the AMR26 lost 0.208s/lap in S1, gained 0.150s/lap in S2, and was neutral in S3. Alonso was also about 8.2km/h slower at the main speed trap

2. Would more optimal strategies have changed their finishing position?

Lance maximised his race and finished p13. Fernando would have finished p12

3. Where Aston lost and gained time

Lost: Alonso's worst spell was L24–26, when he lost 6.08s in three laps to Bortoleto on the same-age soft. About 45% was in Sector 1. He was also circulating in the Lawson/Bortoleto traffic group, so this was a combination of ageing tyres and dirty air—not tyre degradation alone. Alonso's actual L34 stop brought him out 0.1s behind Bearman and 0.8s behind Sainz. That was a poor rejoin, although his fresh-medium pace cleared both by L37.

Gained: Stroll's L8 stop worked extremely well. He went from 7.91s behind Alonso on L8 to only 0.09s behind by L34, recovering 7.82s relative to the other Aston. That proves the early stop worked; it does not prove the full two-stop race was mathematically perfect.

Against Bortoleto on identical-age softs over L2–13, Alonso was virtually level overall—only 0.049s per lap slower—but the distribution was revealing: the AMR26 lost 0.208s/lap in S1, gained 0.150s/lap in S2, and was neutral in S3. Alonso was also about 8.2km/h slower at the main speed trap

Hey! Motivated by Aston Martin's upgrade, I have decided to start doing this.

1. Where did they stand this Race?

Alonso had the 11th fastest S1, 10th fastest S2 and S3. Stroll had the 17th, 13th and 14th fastest sectors respectively. Not to mention Alonso was as quick as gasly in his final stint with roughly equal tyres.

Comparison	Sector 1	Sector 2	Sector 3
Alonso vs Bortoleto, L2–13, identical-age softs	0.208s slower	0.150s faster	0.009s faster
Alonso vs Gasly, L62–69, Alonso’s softs 3 laps older	0.468s slower	0.258s faster	0.211s faster

Against Bortoleto on identical-age softs over L2–13, Alonso was virtually level overall—only 0.049s per lap slower—but the distribution was revealing: the AMR26 lost 0.208s/lap in S1, gained 0.150s/lap in S2, and was neutral in S3. Alonso was also about 8.2km/h slower at the main speed trap

2. Would more optimal strategies have changed their finishing position?

Lance maximised his race and finished p13. Fernando would have finished p12

3. Where Aston lost and gained time

Lost: Alonso's worst spell was L24–26, when he lost 6.08s in three laps to Bortoleto on the same-age soft. About 45% was in Sector 1. He was also circulating in the Lawson/Bortoleto traffic group, so this was a combination of ageing tyres and dirty air—not tyre degradation alone. Alonso's actual L34 stop brought him out 0.1s behind Bearman and 0.8s behind Sainz. That was a poor rejoin, although his fresh-medium pace cleared both by L37.

Gained: Stroll's L8 stop worked extremely well. He went from 7.91s behind Alonso on L8 to only 0.09s behind by L34, recovering 7.82s relative to the other Aston. That proves the early stop worked; it does not prove the full two-stop race was mathematically perfect.

Against Bortoleto on identical-age softs over L2–13, Alonso was virtually level overall—only 0.049s per lap slower—but the distribution was revealing: the AMR26 lost 0.208s/lap in S1, gained 0.150s/lap in S2, and was neutral in S3. Alonso was also about 8.2km/h slower at the main speed trap

What the actual hell was that alonso strategy. Easily could've finished ahead of gasly.

Same as above