The child on the toy phone is not the Crying Child.
Why do people think that this is BV?
The Idea that Phone owned a toy phone, the fact that it's a crying child and bv is blind in logbook.
Why it can't be?
"He never sees me..." is not same thing as "I can't see". Secondly, under the idea ofthis was a person that used to talk to david then it's can't be BV as BV was likely not born yet. BVBorn76 or BVBorn78 are more likely than any other BV Birth Year Theories, which come after David's death. Also "He never sees me..." can be william but i see more people think that "He never sees me..." means "I can't see".
Other candidates
David
David fits better with it. He has a toy phone, he is a child, and "He" could be Edwin, there is onr big problem with this: The call is come from the other end.
Micheal Afton
Now let's talk about the oddball in the room
Phone - Likely
Child - Likely
Crying - Debatable
"He" - William
Micheal would be a child in the mid 70s, so it fit better time-wise and in fact we seen a game that depicts micheal as a child and that child has a toy phone, FNaF 4.
\"Playing as a child whose role is yet unknown\"
BV's Bedroom is different from the bedroom from fnaf 4 as seen in sl.
Now onto the crying part, an abusive or neglect child would cry.
