u/D3-Doom

Thought it was neat.

Unsure if posts regarding beta’s of prior versions is allowed so remove if not.

If you’re on either of the versions listed in the title, the cause seems to be due to something in that update breaking adguard’s network extension rendering macOS “unable to reach adguard’s code.”

Similar isn’t being reported in Tahoe so the advice for the interim is just disabling adguard completely until apple ships a fix (hopefully soon)

Others might already be aware as the issue seems to have a lot of traffic, but I’m posting because I personally didn’t realize adguard was at the center of the networking issues until I noticed a lack of adblocking. The app itself isn’t throwing too much of a fit to make the association readily apparent.

I’d recommend using the free versions of AdGuard Mini for Safari, UBlock Lite, or WBlock for the in the interim. While it might not compare to your default AdGuard preferences I feel personally it’s better than either raw dogging the internet with nothing or leaving your machine in an unusable state until a fix is prepared.

Edit: If AdGuard was an interface for an upstream DoH service like NextDNS or ControlD the official apps don’t seem to be affected by the bug and both play nicely with Wireguard VPN’s. Daisy chaining it all together isn’t optimal, but works decently enough to bridge the gap for most functions other than custom DNS blocklists and Userscripts. For the latter, the Userscripts app should do the trick actually tends to tolerate UserCSS a bit better than AdGuard proper.

It goes without saying Firefox is by far more insulated with full UBO/ TamperMonkey/ Stylus extensions long since reaching maturity. Less familiar with Chromium but so long as the manifest v2 workarounds still work I’d assume a comparable can be achieved free of charge.

- - - - - - - - - -

Linked below is the issue page in question on Adguard for MacOS’s bug tracking repository.

Update: The beta builds released on July 20th, 2026 are also broken

Builds: 15.7.8 (24G822) & 14.8.8 (23J619)

I got baited by someone on a dating site into sending nudes. They’re threatening to put them online with photos from the dating app, my number; and the implication I committed sexual assault if I didn’t pay up.

I obviously said piss off but do they ever follow through? Does it matter if they do?

So I’m super high and my brain is making a bunch of out of pocket connections, but is it possible “Tall Morty” was actually the first Rick the council used the machine on that inverts the conscious and subconscious mind?

Tall Morty always stuck out to me because Rick’s aren’t exactly sentimental. Usually, when they kill or maim one they leave them where they fall and probably wouldn’t hesitate to put one down if they did get irreparable brain damage. Seeing how the citadel does actually run on capitalism someone is paying for this guy to live there and I assume just throwing him in Morty school is the easiest way to babysit him.

They wanted to use the machine on Rick C-137 and referred to him as a disgruntled Rick with the machine coming off as the default sentence. Too much silly smoke or something to this?

Today is annual Doom Patrol day, in which the town of Cloverton celebrates our local heroes for their heroic rescue of Isabel Feathers

I found an old cassette labeled Lost Finale, but underneath some other stuff I vaguely think is another show. Pretty sure Lost didn’t wrap up in 2005 either. It was mixed in with a bunch of junk I inherited from a relative in the media industry, so I’m guessing it’s just an old screener but can’t make heads or tails of it. Unfortunately, there wasn’t a VCR to go with the tape, so that’s on the to-do list. The label is surprisingly crisp for a VHS old enough to drink so I figured it’s worth seeing if anyone can make heads or tails of it.

Edit: Reddit appended Jim to the tittle.. for some reason.

Is this a made-for-tv expression or is this common somewhere?