Can Abstract Art be evil? Is it generally? Is it necessarily so?
I am kind of puzzled because I can admit a certain aggressive ugliness in art nowadays that a lot of Christians are drawing attention to. However I am conflicted because I compose as a hobby and I feel like I want to compose in a godly way. But the truth be told, I am very enamored with the so-called "excesses" of 20th century music. Like I like dissonant music, even atonal music and I am wondering is that perhaps wrong because of some objective standard of ugliness (which I may well admit exists in music)? Also as someone "on the inside", I am aware of the difficulties of drawing a line in the sand, like Act 3 Scene 2 of the Meistersinger Von Nurmburg byWagner would have been regarded as completely "decadent" and "bizarre' by listeners of its day, now its just somewhat mysterious proto-impressionism and quite pretty.
Meanwhile there are scores of dissonant and atonal music written by ardent Christ followers. Messiaen is the most obvious example of this but if you are insistent on the whole evangelical thing, then Joonas Kokkonen was one of 3 composers who stamped their catalog "SDG" with one other of course being Bach, a composer who in his own right and time performed some hyper-chromatic stunts.
I am also not a painter in the slightest but I find the notion of cubism very interesting and my favorite painting is called The Arrival; its an abstracted cubist picture of a ship docking in a harbor.
This is really something that has been nagging at me, if I am proceeding in good faith with my own compositions. I felt like I had it worked out that, because music is inherently abstract, without words or text or visuals of some kind, its fundamentally incorruptible; at worst you'll just produce meaningless noise. But I don't know, maybe that is a cope. These are tough questions for sure.