The prequels were a cautionary tale
George Lucas was always a borderline radical leftist in his politics. He based the OT on the Vietnam War, straight up saying the Rebels (i.e. the good guys) were inspired by the Viet Cong and the Empire on a combination of the US military and Nazi Germany (the Imp uniforms had a clear resemblance to SS ones). He also donated his personal wealth to things like constructing the MLK Jr. Memorial in Washington, DC.
It's really clear to me that the whole point of the prequels was George trying to communicate, "This is how authoritarian governments rise." On some level, I do think he was also trying to communicate, "This is also why young men are vulnerable to being radicalized into extremism" through the character of Anakin Skywalker.
When I see the rise of the global far right, I do see how much of it is driven by young men with grievances and radicalized into extremism with promises of, "I could give you what you always wanted (e.g., money, friends, the hot girl's love, etc.) which 'they' (whoever 'they' may be) were too stupid/shallow/woke/whatever to give you!" And then how many of these same young men end up losing everything like their money, their friends and family, and maybe even their lives because they were suckered into helping the far right.
Anakin Skywalker was promised the power to save everyone he loved (or rather, had an unhealthy possessiveness over) and to finally put the Separatists back in their place. Instead, he lost everyone that loved him and most of his own body because he was a sucker for Palpatine. At no point was Anakin actually rewarded for embracing fascism.