
I work at Dunkin and I’m a chemistry major so I’m gonna explain why this is hilarious
So the lawsuit claims that the woman was getting Dunkin Zeros three times a week because she was trying to limit her sugar intake. And then says that it’s “misleading” because the Zeros contain allulose. First of all, the Zeros are zero SUGAR. Not unsweetened. If they’re gonna be sweet there has to be some kind of sweetener in them or else they taste like crap. Allulose is a simple, natural sugar that contains less calories than regular sugar. The important thing to know is that allulose DOES NOT RAISE YOUR BLOOD SUGAR. It doesn’t get processed into glucose or even anything at all. You just pee it out. So if you’re trying to limit your sugar intake for blood sugar related purposes, allulose isn’t harmful to your goals.
We were laughing about this at work today. Thought I’d share