everyone told me not to do a coloured wardrobe. 1 year later the only thing i got wrong was the finish

everyone told me not to do a coloured wardrobe. 1 year later the only thing i got wrong was the finish

My mother's exact words were you will get bored of it in six months. carpenter tried three separate times to talk me into the beige, the designer called the colour a resale risk on a wardrobe, which, on a piece of furniture that is screwed into my wall, ok.

did it in a deep rose anyway. floor to ceiling with loft cabinets above, off white inside, thin metal handles. one year in i still walk into that room happy, so on the colour - i was right and everyone else was wrong.

where i was wrong: i did it in gloss.

it photographs beautifully but in real life it holds every single fingerprint, and because the shutters are full height, the marks sit exactly at hand level on a 6 foot panel. i'm wiping it twice a week. i'd do the identical shade in a matte if i were starting again and i think it would look better and be more practical.

for anyone wondering, roya

u/Growthseeker23 — 2 days ago

What's the best way to share a presentation with someone who doesn't want to download a PPT?

I've started running into this more often these days.

I'll make a presentation and then send someone a pptx (end users usually make edits so pdf won't work), but they either don't have PowerPoint, open it on their phone, or just don't want to download another file.

I'm wondering if people have moved toward web-based presentations instead.

I am looking for a sharable link that works well in broswer and looks good on mobile without having to build a webpage from scratch

what are people facing this scenario using?

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 3 days ago

the handoff problem - how are you getting good output a human can send to a human

The chain works right up until the end, and then a person spends twenty minutes turning the output into something client-facing. So the automation saved forty minutes and cost twenty, and the twenty lands at the worst possible point - the end, when it's late and you're done thinking.

I've tried templating the last step and it's breaks the second the shape of the content changes. I've tried gamma as the final stage, which closes maybe 70% of it and is the best i've found.

The remaining 30% is that it doesn't know my client's conventions, how they want numbers written, which section they always read first, the fact that one of them wants the recommendation at the top and the other wants it at the bottom.

So a person still opens it and fixes the same four things every single time, which means the last mile is a context problem, and i don't think formatting tools can solve context. Does sharing a client brand doc with a claude bot, alongwith all the minutes of meetings from fathom work well?

what's your last mile? has anyone closed the loop, or does everyone have a human sitting at the end of the pipeline?

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 7 days ago

Do you build the deck first or write the argument first?

I open the thing, make a title slide, and start noting things down. somewhere around slide six I realise Im going round and round, and everything after that is me making the confusion look tidy.

A colleague writes it as one paragraph first. one paragraph and then her deck takes twenty minutes because she already knows what every slide is for.

i've been using gamma for the quick ones, and now i can have thirty presentable slides before i've had a single clear thought, the deck existing makes me feel like im further along than i am and that really helps me.

I've tried her way twice (writing a deck in a paragraph bit) and abandoned it both times, because a blank page feels worse than a blank slide lol

Which way do you work? and if you switched your method recently, what made you switch?

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 8 days ago

The prompt structure that actually works when you are describing something visual

Most people describe what they want visually the way they would describe it to a friend, and then wonder why the result looks generic. what works better, in this order:

  1. reference, not adjective. "like stripe's dashboard" is better context than "clean and modern". adjectives = same bland result every time.

  2. Clarify the density. how much information is on screen at once is a significant driver of how something feels, and the part people dont pay attention to.

  3. name the one section the eye should hit first.

  4. specify what happens in the empty state and the error state. these are half your screens

  5. give it constraints rather than goals. "two colours plus grey" produces better output than "good colour scheme".

  6. describe the user's mood, not the brand's. "someone checking this at 11pm while tired" makes the output better.

what do you all use?

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 9 days ago
▲ 1.1k r/antiwork

manager asked me to make it look nice on a friday. i did it in eleven minutes. eleven minutes is now the expectation.

i'm in ops. the deck was for a monday morning standup. she sent it at 4:52pm with a text - can you make this look nice before you go x. So i did it. dumped it in gamma, rewrote the headings myself because the generated ones are embarrassing, sent it back at 5:03. She replied oh amazing, that was quick!!

That was three weeks ago. since then i've had to do four more. the most recent one said shouldn't take you long 😊

Im starting to learn this: the moment you demonstrate that something takes eleven minutes, it becomes an eleven minute task forever, and it becomes yours forever, and it appears nowhere in your job description or your review.

i have invented a new part of my role by being fast at something once. Like they say - the reward for good work is more work.

the correct move was obviously to sit on it until 5:40 and send it back looking tired lol. Should I just teach someone who’s job role entails building support docs like this? im not sure i wanna spill my secrets.

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 14 days ago

What are some alternative systems / tools to create system design docs other than Figma?

there are basically four designers in my team, about 40 people in eng, pm and marketing who need to know what exists and why. The system itself is fine, components in figma, tokens in code, storybook current.

The problem is the layer above it, why we made these decisions, when to use which pattern, what we deliberately don't do. Noone outside of the design team opens those.

So I get asked the same six questions every month and the answer is always "it's documented," and it's documented - is the room they will never go in.

how do i make this friction-free for the non-design folks?

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 14 days ago

Top 3 tips for creating an effective PowerPoint presentation? Adding mine, want yours

The highest-voted advice i've ever seen on this was: write the main point of each slide as one sentence, in a separate document, in order. If reading it top to bottom doesn't make an argument, no amount of formatting saves the deck. That's rule one for me now and everything else is downstream.

mine: write the sentences first, in prose, before any slide exists. you find out immediately whether you have a coherent argument or a list of topics. one number per slide maximum. two numbers means the audience retains one. the appendix is where you put everything you were too scared to cut.

what are yours? more than three welcome hehe.

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 16 days ago

Every AI deck tool produces the same look after about the fifth deck. What are you doing about it?

ive been using Gamma for a few months and generally like the output ive got. The complaint is that deck 1 looked stunning and deck 9 looks like deck 1 and my clients have started recognising this pattern. Someone said oh that's the AI one in a meeting last week and they were right and it stung.

I think the problem is partly the tool and mostly my prompting.

Things I've tried that helped a bit:

Asking for a specific structure rather than a topic. Three sections, first is one number, second is a comparison, third is a single recommendation.

Naming a visual reference in the prompt. Describing the feel of something specific rather than saying professional, which is a word that means nothing to AI.

Writing the content fully myself first and only using the tool for layout. Best results by a distance, also the most work.

Things I haven't cracked yet: getting variety across decks without rebuilding the theme every time.

What's in your prompt?

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 16 days ago

Al video editing tools: what actually works vs the hype, I went through all ~50 of them [SEO mega-listicle]

Got tired of every best AI video tools article being written by the tool's own marketing blog (go google it, Reap ranks Reap #1, quso ranks quso #1, it's a joke). So I spent two weekends going through every AI video tool I could find. No affiliate links, no sponsors, just notes.

Agentic / chat-driven editors(you describe the edit, it executes)

- Descript - edit video by editing the transcript. Best for talking-head/podcast. Underlord AI features are hit-or-miss.

- Cardboard - chat-to-edit + searches footage by describing what happens in it

- Kapwing AI - decent all-rounder, AI features shallow.

- InVideo AI - generates from prompts, template-y results.

- Wisecut - auto-cuts silences + music, rough around edges.

- Reap - clipping + editor + dubbing combo; heavily self-promoted, decent tool.

Long-form → shorts clipping

- Opus Clip - defined the category, virality scores are astrology but clips are solid.

- Vizard - underrated, good speaker tracking.

- Klap

- Munch

- 2short

- quso (ex-vidyo)

- Choppity

- Spikes Studio

Silence / filler-word removal & rough cuts

- Gling (YouTubers) ·

- TimeBolt (fast, ugly UI) ·

- Recut (Mac, one-time price) ·

- AutoCut/Firecut (Premiere plugins)

Captions

- Submagic

- Captions app (mobile)

- Zapcap

- Subly

- built-in CapCut/Premiere captions (free and fine)

Podcast / multicam

- AutoPod (Premiere multicam standard)

- Riverside Magic Clips

- Podcastle

Traditional editors with real AI features

- Premiere Pro (text-based editing, enhance speech)

- DaVinci Resolve (Magic Mask, voice isolation, and free)

- CapCut (good, but features keep moving behind paywall)

- Filmora

- Clipchamp

- PowerDirector

- Final Cut (AI-light)

Text-to-video GENERATION (different job, makes footage, doesn't edit yours)

- Sora

- Runway

- Google Veo

- Kling

- Pika

- Luma Dream Machine

- LTX Studio

- Hailuo

Avatars / talking heads

- HeyGen

- Synthesia(corporate)

- Tavus

- D-ID

- Colossyan

Dubbing / translation

- ElevenLabs

- Rask

- HeyGen dubbing

- Papercup

Gaming highlights

- Eklipse (stream auto-clips)

- Framedrop

- Powder

Faceless / stock-assembly video

- Pictory

- Lumen5

- Fliki

- Steve.ai category is mostly template slideshows with an AI badge.

Enhancement / utility

- Topaz Video AI

- Adobe Enhance Speech

- Auphonic (audio) Colourlab

- Unscreen (bg removal)

AI music (for your edits)

- Suno

- Udio

- Soundraw

Semantic footage search (find moments by describing them)

- Twelve Labs (API, for devs)

- Jumper (NLE plugin, local)

- Cardboard (built into its editor, listed above)

Closing line: Corrections welcome , I'll edit the post. What did I miss?

reddit.com
u/Growthseeker23 — 20 days ago

Honest review of Gamma after ~12 months and a few hundred slides. What it's genuinely good at and where it’s not upto the mark.

I've seen a lot of one-week reviews from redditors but i could tell not many are from people who've lived in it. Started using it in my final year of uni, still using it now that I'm working. Made 100+ decks till date.

Not affiliated with them, I pay for it (ss of my first ever payment attached to post), and there's a decent list of things I don't like below. **What it's actually good at…**

Long input. You can paste a 20-page document in and it will structure it rather than producing five slides of generic filler. Preserve mode keeps my sentences language does not reek of ai. That single feature is why I'm still paying.

Fast to a first draft. I don't get a finished deck I get something 50-70% there, and I can edit five times faster than I write from blank. My deck time went from about 3 hours to about 50 minutes and most of that 50 minutes is now content rather than alignment.

Cards instead of fixed slides. Content decides the length rather than you cramming things into a 16:9 box. The almost unlimited length of a card now makes PowerPoint feel claustrophobic.

Link sharing with analytics. Seeing if a prospect read my proposal and where they stopped reading it is very useful information in sales.

Where it doesn’t work:

PowerPoint export. Layout shifts, spacing changes, its basically not usable. They’ve added some scales to help with alignment length but i find that more of an inconvenience. Can use if you can send PDF’s, or links.

Sameness. Around deck 5 you start seeing your own patterns. Themes help, but you have to actively work against the default or everything you make looks related.

Credits. I've made worse decisions to avoid a regeneration and not get into a situation where i run out of them. I'd pay more for a flat plan.

The AI images. I turn them off entirely. They look like AI images and everyone can tell.

Editing precision. If you want a specific element in a specific place at a specific size, you will be annoyed. It's opinionated about layout.

Who I'd tell to buy it

People who write a lot and design badly. Students, consultants, anyone doing a lot of one-off decks that end their life as a link or a PDF.

Who I'd tell not to

Anyone whose deck has to end up as an editable PowerPoint in someone else's hands. Anyone who needs pixel control. Anyone with a strict brand system with a designer enforcing it.

Happy to answer questions if any.

u/Growthseeker23 — 20 days ago
▲ 4 r/Realme

Getting 7 hours sot

Getting 7 hours from 100 to 20 in gt7t is this battery performance is good 2nd week of my usage

u/Growthseeker23 — 2 months ago
▲ 2 r/Realme

Pushed my gt 7t to 48° degree

Bored so text my gt7t and the stability was 70 above and reached 48 degree all time high from my device

u/Growthseeker23 — 2 months ago
▲ 7 r/Realme

Realme ui 7.1 battery optimisation in GT7T

Ui 7.1 give an huge battery optimisation jump i think i am getting good sot at EOD it was lik 31 it was good and far better then previous one

Usage multitasking and used social media a bit phone calls

u/Growthseeker23 — 2 months ago