u/HotTwo8570

For me José Mourinho

Assalomu alaykum everyone

Is this being pro-Iran, or is it an impartial view?

If you say that Iran’s current policies do not seem like mere theater and showmanship, people ask: do you consider Shi’a beliefs to be correct? They say Sunnis and Shi’as can never be united, and that Shi’as are enemies.

First of all, I have never said that I consider Shi’a doctrine correct, nor have I justified the bloodshed Iran has inflicted on Sunnis up to this point. But Iran is not the only one responsible for this; Sunni state leaders have done the same. Even now, they are pouring water into the enemy’s mill.

Also, I neither curse the Shi’as nor consider them enemies. The enemy is clear and obvious. Matters of theological error can be resolved by scholars sitting together and discussing them.

And I do not intend to unite Sunnis and Shi’as either. I am only saying that we should seek coexistence and compromise. Not only Shi’as — even Sunnis themselves can never realistically be united under a single creed and a single school of jurisprudence. This is the will of Allah, and Islam is beautiful precisely because of this; otherwise it would become a dogmatic religion. The important point is this: one belief should not harm another belief physically or morally. Islam commands this.

Then why are we judging Iran’s actions not based on outward realities, but through our own suspicions and assumptions? Up to now, the Palestinian people have not expressed gratitude to any country other than Iran. Perhaps they know better than us where help is truly coming from… Why are we not discussing, with the same level of suspicion that we direct at Iran, the open material support that Turkey, Egypt, and the wealthy Arab states are giving to Israel? That is what is surprising.

Is this being pro-Iran, or is it an impartial view?

If you say that Iran’s current policies do not seem like mere theater and showmanship, people ask: do you consider Shi’a beliefs to be correct? They say Sunnis and Shi’as can never be united, and that Shi’as are enemies.

First of all, I have never said that I consider Shi’a doctrine correct, nor have I justified the bloodshed Iran has inflicted on Sunnis up to this point. But Iran is not the only one responsible for this; Sunni state leaders have done the same. Even now, they are pouring water into the enemy’s mill.

Also, I neither curse the Shi’as nor consider them enemies. The enemy is clear and obvious. Matters of theological error can be resolved by scholars sitting together and discussing them.

And I do not intend to unite Sunnis and Shi’as either. I am only saying that we should seek coexistence and compromise. Not only Shi’as — even Sunnis themselves can never realistically be united under a single creed and a single school of jurisprudence. This is the will of Allah, and Islam is beautiful precisely because of this; otherwise it would become a dogmatic religion. The important point is this: one belief should not harm another belief physically or morally. Islam commands this.

Then why are we judging Iran’s actions not based on outward realities, but through our own suspicions and assumptions? Up to now, the Palestinian people have not expressed gratitude to any country other than Iran. Perhaps they know better than us where help is truly coming from… Why are we not discussing, with the same level of suspicion that we direct at Iran, the open material support that Turkey, Egypt, and the wealthy Arab states are giving to Israel? That is what is surprising.

Is this being pro-Iran, or is it an impartial view?

If you say that Iran’s current policies do not seem like mere theater and showmanship, people ask: do you consider Shi’a beliefs to be correct? They say Sunnis and Shi’as can never be united, and that Shi’as are enemies.

First of all, I have never said that I consider Shi’a doctrine correct, nor have I justified the bloodshed Iran has inflicted on Sunnis up to this point. But Iran is not the only one responsible for this; Sunni state leaders have done the same. Even now, they are pouring water into the enemy’s mill.

Also, I neither curse the Shi’as nor consider them enemies. The enemy is clear and obvious. Matters of theological error can be resolved by scholars sitting together and discussing them.

And I do not intend to unite Sunnis and Shi’as either. I am only saying that we should seek coexistence and compromise. Not only Shi’as — even Sunnis themselves can never realistically be united under a single creed and a single school of jurisprudence. This is the will of Allah, and Islam is beautiful precisely because of this; otherwise it would become a dogmatic religion. The important point is this: one belief should not harm another belief physically or morally. Islam commands this.

Then why are we judging Iran’s actions not based on outward realities, but through our own suspicions and assumptions? Up to now, the Palestinian people have not expressed gratitude to any country other than Iran. Perhaps they know better than us where help is truly coming from… Why are we not discussing, with the same level of suspicion that we direct at Iran, the open material support that Turkey, Egypt, and the wealthy Arab states are giving to Israel? That is what is surprising.

“Is this being pro-Iran, or is it an impartial view?

If you say that Iran’s current policies do not seem like mere theater and showmanship, people ask: do you consider Shi’a beliefs to be correct? They say Sunnis and Shi’as can never be united, and that Shi’as are enemies.

First of all, I have never said that I consider Shi’a doctrine correct, nor have I justified the bloodshed Iran has inflicted on Sunnis up to this point. But Iran is not the only one responsible for this; Sunni state leaders have done the same. Even now, they are pouring water into the enemy’s mill.

Also, I neither curse the Shi’as nor consider them enemies. The enemy is clear and obvious. Matters of theological error can be resolved by scholars sitting together and discussing them.

And I do not intend to unite Sunnis and Shi’as either. I am only saying that we should seek coexistence and compromise. Not only Shi’as — even Sunnis themselves can never realistically be united under a single creed and a single school of jurisprudence. This is the will of Allah, and Islam is beautiful precisely because of this; otherwise it would become a dogmatic religion. The important point is this: one belief should not harm another belief physically or morally. Islam commands this.

Then why are we judging Iran’s actions not based on outward realities, but through our own suspicions and assumptions? Up to now, the Palestinian people have not expressed gratitude to any country other than Iran. Perhaps they know better than us where help is truly coming from… Why are we not discussing, with the same level of suspicion that we direct at Iran, the open material support that Turkey, Egypt, and the wealthy Arab states are giving to Israel? That is what is surprising.

Assalamu Alaykum everyone. As a Muslim, one question has been bothering me for a long time and this question may sound a bit rude. We know that Jesus peace be upon him did not die on the cross and that another man was crucified in his place. And Allah showed the crucified man as Jesus, peace be upon him. Doesn't it seem like Allah deceived his apostles and other people who witnessed the crucifixion by pretending to crucify Jesus?