Also, I wanted to also say that regardless of AftonMM, William is still very much represented by gold too. It's just that it's heavily implied that William is the Mustard Man, and him being the Mustard Man would further show William's connection to the color gold.
Thoughts on this?
TLDR: WorldCanon + DeskScott + SpaceCanon + HDMemories + WorldParacosm + WorldDuringUCN + HDPostUCN + RWQWorldPlayer + DoofasOMC + RalphOMC + WillPlush + WillSpeaker + CassidyPlush Alter-M + GlitchbearCassidy
Thoughts on this?
This is no where else in the game to my knowledge, and I haven't seen anyone else talk about this. This seems like a pretty obvious indication that The Storyteller might've existed in the games.
TLDR: Security Breach 2 will most likely take place at Freddy's Fantasy Waterpark and will be adapting Submechaniphobia. The player will likely be named James, and there will be a new version of Vanny (nicknamed "Vandex") running around. The ghosts of Jason Butterfield and Martin Copper will likely be present, as well as The Mimic in some way or another.
https://www.reddit.com/r/fnaftheories/s/QAm7sRVXB1
Thoughts on this?
A minor detail I forgot to mention is that in the 2-Star Ending of ITPG, it is revealed that The Yellow Rabbit survived. This could be pointing towards to things. The first is that it could just be telling us that "it's not over yet" and continuing the theme of being forever trapped. Or, this could be showing us what originally happened to Oswald IRL, he thought he killed it and he thought he won, but The Yellow Rabbit survived and later came back for Oswald. Very minor thing, might mean something, might not.
Anyways, thoughts on this?
As far as I can tell, there is nothing in the Steel Wool post.
However, the ScottGames post seems to be telling us that we are actually getting a real life Freddy Fazbear's Pizza in the American Dream Mall, East Rutherford, NJ. This is either the best idea Scott has ever had, or the worst. Either way I am hyped for it.
This is an updated version/remake of this post I made from like 2 years ago
Thoughts on this?
I've always been of the belief of WillPlush and WillSpeaker, although I have recently been heavily considering CassidySpeaker with CassidyPlush Alter-M.
However, I'm making a full Analysis Post of Fnaf World right now and I have hit a massive roadblock with Glitchbear. It seems like Glitchbear has to be The Final Speaker, but it would also make a ton of sense for him to be the Fredbear Plush, but GlitchbearAfton doesn't really make sense. And in doing this I have really started to question my stance on the Fredbear Plush and Final Speaker as a whole, and this feels like way to big of a topic to fit into a small section of a Fnaf World Analysis Post.
So what are you opinions on this? And why do you believe what you believe?
I'm making this because his SOTM song came out yesterday. The animation/visuals in that song were genuinely amazing, but the song wasn't really for me.
Links to songs:
Five Nights at Freddy's 1 Song
For me, it has to be Old Man Consequences and MXES.
With OMC, I haven't been able to find a good explanation for him. I used to believe BVOMC for a long time, but I don't find it to be as likely anymore. Right now the most likely OMC theories imo are EntityOMC and EdwinOMC. I feel like the connection between OMC and Edwin is undeniable, but at the same time it doesn't make much sense, and I could see other explanations. Plus, I feel like it's not even concrete that OMC is an alligator, him being a hippo or Doofas would also make a ton of sense. But like, HenryOMC, RalphOMC, and GrandpaOMC also make a ton of sense. Then there is the fact that he is implied to be connected to David and David-Mimic in some way via parallels, which clutters things even more. So idk, I am super conflicted on this.
With MXES, I literally have no idea. As for the actual machine, there are two main explanations. Either MXES is separate from F10-N4 and there are two MXES machines, or they are the same machine and the design was either retconned or changed after the MCM Fire. But I'm not talking about the machine (for the most part), I'm mainly referring to The Entity within MXES. Seriously, who tf is The Entity?? He obviously shares many similarities with Glitchtrap, but obviously he isn't Glitchtrap. If anything, it makes no sense for The Entity to exist if MXES is F10-N4. MXES also lines up with much of the imagery/symbolism in SOTM regarding Edwin. There is also the possibility that MXES was created after being experimented on/altered by Afton? But then the ending of HW2 implies that it has existed since the 70s, so that complicates things even more. Then we have the fact that the scrapped design for The Entity looks just like how Afton's soul was described in Frights, and the fact that Scott would've originally given MXES a temporary name involving the suffix of "-trap" (implying that he is a variant of Glitchtrap or Burntrap in some form).
So anyways, what is something in Fnaf that you just can't understand/find a good answer to?
(and if you have a good explanation for OMC or MXES that you want to make a case for, please tell me, I'd be interested to hear it)
Thoughts on this?
Thoughts on this?
Second image by u/Inksstuff
In my opinion: Mike, William, and maybe Charlie made it out of the fire. I believe MikeSurvival, and I believe that some version of the Stitchwraith Stingers did happen in the games (meaning that William did survive the fire, as for Charlie I'm not entirely sure if she survived in the games version of the Stingers).
I am also open to/considering the possibility of ElizaVANNI though, it does raise good points.
The post about Helpy's NDA Mints basically confirmed our suspicions that Steel Wool has been posting teasers on Twitter for something Fnaf related, and from what we have gotten so far it looks like it will be set in a pool-environment/waterpark and take place after SB or RUIN.
Considering that SOTM was an adaption of The Mimic, and we already know of a Fazbear-themed waterpark, it's possible that the next game might be an adaptation of Submechaniphobia set in Freddy's Fantasy Waterpark.
A lot of people have been trying to look into the spot-the-difference parts of these posts to see if there is a code or pattern of some kind that might reveal something (like a release date), but I seriously doubt it. I think the very fact that we are getting teasers alone should be the important part, I would be surprised if both of these posts had some encoded message in it using the pool noodles, or glasses, or whatever.
I know this idea was brought up earlier, but I thought I'd give my take and analysis of it so far.
Thoughts on this?
Slide 13's Credit: The Foxy Conspiracy by u/bluestargreenmoon
Like I said, take the Leon Riskin section with a huge grain of salt, but outside of that I truly believe that there is a ton of evidence pointing towards Mike surviving the FFPS Fire and being an important character in the modern story. I've been talking about making this post for 8 months now, idk why it took me so long, guess I was just procastinating it.
Thoughts on this?
Out of all the options (Mike, BV, Cassidy, Andrew, etc), Mike is the only character I can see being put into the Nightmare Chambers by William.
However I’m not sure and have been trying to make up my mind about it, so that’s why I’m making this post
Something I see brought up all the time in almost every TOYSNHK discussion is that for Andrew to be TOYSNHK, first you have to prove that Andrew is in the games. But that argument just makes no sense.
Let me use an analogy: There is a red apple on a table. The person you are with says that he will only accept that the apple is red, if you can prove that the apple exists... without using the apple. So now, without using the apple itself, you have to prove that that the apple on the table exists.
See how difficult and nonsensical that seems? It's the same thing with Andrew.
Let's just assume that you believe Andrew is TOYSNHK for a minute (this will be easy if you already believe AndrewTOYSNHK): That means that Andrew's one and only appearance in the mainline games is in UCN as TOYSNHK. Now, in a discussion involving AndrewTOYSNHK, someone tells you to prove that Andrew is in the games, and only then will they believe AndrewTOYSNHK. How are you supposed to do that? If Andrew's only appearance is as TOYSNHK, then how are you supposed to prove his existence without using TOYSNHK?
The answer is that you don't have to.
Proof of Andrew's existence shouldn't be, and isn't, a prerequisite for AndrewTOYSNHK. When considering TOYSNHK theories, AndrewTOYSNHK should be treated no differently then any other TOYSNHK theory with characters confirmed to exist in the games. The deciding factory of AndrewTOYSNHK shouldn't be proof of his existence outside of TOYSNHK, it should be whether you find AndrewTOYSNHK's evidence convincing. If you do, Andrew is in the games and is TOYSNHK, if you don't, Andrew isn't in the games and isn't TOYSNHK.
If AndrewTOYSNHK is true, then AndrewGames is true, not the other way around.
This isn't even the first time this has happened either, it happened with Edwin before SOTM was announced.
Before SOTM's first trailers and teasers, many people argued that The Mimic alone wasn't proof of Edwin's existence in the games, and that some other game character had to of been the creator of The Mimic. If you could prove that Edwin existed in the games, then that means he was the creator of The Mimic in the games, but because there was no other indicators other than that at the time, a large amount of people went with the belief that Edwin was just a parallel to another game character that created The Mimic (it was Henry, many people believed Edwin was a Henry parallel).
Then SOTM was announced, and as the trailers came out, it became obvious that Edwin was in the games and was the creator of The Mimic. Now, the only reason that the "EdwinGames debate" ended was because of SOTM, with TOYSNHK, his game came out 8 years ago and the AndrewGames debate hasn't ended. The main reason for that was because of how popular GoldenTOYSNHK is, and the fact that Andrew doesn't have any relevence outside of UCN and The Stitchwraith Stingers, so there was no reason to ever bring him up again. That was until ITPG and RTTP came out, and guess what they showed us? They showed us Andrew, and not only that, doubled down on connecting him to TOYSNHK. However, because many people can't agree on the canonicity of those two, and because they aren't mainline games, people haven't taken it as confirmation.
TLDR: AndrewGames isn't a prerequisite of AndrewTOYSNHK. If AndrewTOYSNHK is true, then AndrewGames is true, not the other way around. The deciding factory of AndrewTOYSNHK shouldn't be proof of his existence outside of TOYSNHK, it should be whether you find AndrewTOYSNHK's evidence convincing on it's own.