u/Krunk_korean_kid

Tokenized stock exemptions is the new Bernie Madoff exemption. This will create entire floats of a company's shares (without company concent) and can be used at "LOCATES"... FTX 2.0

youtube.com
u/Krunk_korean_kid — 3 days ago

Some numbers pertaining to $GME + EBAY (by attobit)

Let me try and explain what this means (for those in the back).

  1. $GME pays 50% of the eBay acquisition costs in cash, and 50% in GME stock

  2. The target valuation of eBay is $125 per share. This cash buyout pays existing eBay shareholders $62.5 per share DIRECTLY IN CASH and the remainder is exchanged for GME stock

  3. GME increases authorized share count. This is what the company CAN issue, but are not yet issued.

  4. GME needs this so they have enough shares to EXCHANGE for the rest of eBay's stock

In the example above, a shareholder with 1 share of eBay received $62.5 in cash, but needs 2.5 shares of GME (valued at $25 per share) to cover the remaining 50%.

New stock is not being issued and sold in the open market to cover 100% of the acquisition cost.. its exchanged 2.5 : 1 ( $GME : $EBAY )

x.com
u/Krunk_korean_kid — 11 days ago
▲ 3.1k r/Superstonk+1 crossposts

Ryan NAILED the customer-service problem. I have been selling on eBay for 20+ years, and am/was on the verge of quitting.

(Watching the interview with Justin right now.)

You cannot reach real people. And if you do (no offense here) it is people in the Philippines or India, sometimes with heavy accents, and not really in tune with the "vibe" of the seller's dilemma. All that I receive is "thank you for being a loyal seller for 20+ years", and then all manner of "yes, yes, yes."

Then I get cookie-cutter responses about how they "will take care of me" and "don't worry, your problem will be resolved soon". It never F'ing happens. When I hang up the phone, I am 98% sure, that I just wasted 5-30 minutes for nothing.

Don't even get me started on the CHAT FUNCTION. All parties involved in the horrible evolution of that monstrosity, need to be put in a pillory for 24 hours, receiving the worst of rotten fruit and cheese.

The only times resolution has happened, is, if I can, by some miracle, get a LIVE American customer service agent (I think the trick is to call very early in the morning).

So mostly, I am left with unreasonable knocks on my feedback, punishment by the algorithm, customers punking me on returns, etc...

Ryan needs to hire ME, and many of YOU on here, who have made eBay their living for many years. WE NEED TO BE HIS CONSULTANTS. I'll do it for $1, or maybe some used socks.

RYAN ***** I HOPE YOU READ THIS.

(Plus, if I can make more money, I can buy more shares of GameStop.)

reddit.com
u/Ghost_of_Chrisanova — 13 days ago

FINRA - the walls are closing in and legal discovery to finally bust your asses has never been closer 🧑‍⚖️ #MMTLP

https://x.com/i/status/2053068149747064980

🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️

🦋 $MMAT | In re Meta Materials Inc. (Bankr. D. Nev.)

📅 Filed: May 8, 2026 🌶️

📄 Document 2769 — Stipulated Protective Order Relating to Subpoenas to FINRA

🧠 Layman’s Breakdown

This filing is actually good news for the trustee’s investigation.

In simple terms:

🚨 What just happened?

The trustee and FINRA reached an agreement on the rules for turning over sensitive information.

Translation:

FINRA is preparing to produce documents/data, but wanted strict confidentiality protections first.

This is NOT a fight over whether information can be produced.

This is more of a:

🤝 “Fine, we’ll produce it—but here are the rules.”

That’s a meaningful shift.

🎯 Why does this matter?

FINRA previously fought hard, arguing:

⚖️ burden

🔒 privilege

📁 confidentiality

🕵️ investigative protections

Now we have a signed protective order.

That usually means:

✅ Production is moving forward

✅ Logistics are being finalized

✅ The trustee is getting closer to actual evidence

📜 What is a protective order?

Think of it like a court-enforced NDA.

Sensitive material can be handed over, but:

❌ not dumped publicly

❌ not posted online

❌ not used outside this case

✅ only approved people can see it

📊 What can FINRA label confidential?

A LOT.

Examples:

📂 internal regulatory materials

🕵️ investigation-related information

📈 trading / transactional data

🏢 proprietary business info

👤 customer/member information

💰 investor/fund positions

📨 nonpublic communications

Translation:

The trustee may be getting highly sensitive market data.

🔐 Two levels of secrecy

🟡 1. CONFIDENTIAL

Can be seen by:

👩‍⚖️ trustee

⚖️ trustee’s attorneys

👥 staff helping the case

📊 retained experts

🛠 litigation consultants

🔴 2. ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY

Even tighter.

Basically limited to:

⚖️ lawyers

🧠 approved experts

🖥 support personnel

Meaning:

🚫 not broad distribution

👀 HUGE practical point: Who’s on the trustee team?

This filing specifically identifies outside counsel helping the trustee:

⚖️ Hartman & Hartman

⚖️ Christian Attar

🔥 Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP

⚖️ Robison Sharp Sullivan & Brust / SBW

⚖️ Schneider Wallace

Why this matters:

Kasowitz is not your average routine bankruptcy admin firm.

That suggests:

💥 serious litigation preparation

🛡 What FINRA still protects

Important caveat:

FINRA is NOT waiving privilege.

They specifically preserve:

🔒 attorney-client privilege

📚 work product

🕵️ investigative file privilege

⚖️ other legal protections

Translation:

This is NOT “open the vault.”

🌐 Can shareholders see this data?

Not automatically.

If filed with court:

🔐 likely under seal

⚖️ public release would require further steps

So:

👀 shareholders probably won’t immediately see raw production.

🚀 Big strategic takeaway

This strongly suggests discovery is shifting from:

❌ “Should FINRA produce?”

to

✅ “How do we handle what FINRA produces?”

That’s a meaningful procedural win.

The real question now:

🤔 What’s in the data?

🦋 Quick Summary

FINRA and the trustee just agreed on confidentiality rules for subpoenaed materials. That usually means production is moving forward. Sensitive market/regulatory data may be coming in, heavyweight litigation counsel is clearly involved, but much of the evidence may remain sealed unless used later in litigation.

⚠️ Not legal advice

https://x.com/i/status/2052905214219313539

u/Krunk_korean_kid — 14 days ago