u/Luddite333

My opinion is about this world becoming radically peaceful through a love revolution that changes the entire planet and create peace on earth. Left vs. right, west vs. east, or any other division between any aspect of humanity, should end. Even humans vs. the elites are part of that division and inherently creates suffering. Non suffering means radical freedom, everyone feeling free, happy and to live how they want.

With radical freedom everyone will feel free and crime will be gone because if the law ensures freedom for all, then evil which causes suffering to someone else, is in conflict with that freedom, since freedom is the opposite of suffering. Everything that leads to suffering is bad. However, punishments is also bad. So there should be no punishments. Many institutions therefore has to go. Because punishment is also suffering. Hence courts should be gone. Only law should be freedom and that will also require everyone to be happy and feel content and free from restriction or pain.

The law ensures freedom, tax money goes to infrastructure supporting that freedom, including personal desires for entertainment, activites or cultural experiences, so that people feel free and live the dream of their life (as long as everyone else is free). And there is a task force where the altrusim of mankind works to ensure others are free. So with everyone being free this task force relies on trust and altruism.

There is also no longer rich vs. poor, because everyone can be rich or in between or anything else. It's not about trying to take away from someone else, neither the poor or the rich, but about making sure that no one suffers. So therefore poverty will be gone, hunger will be gone and war will be gone, which is used to divide and control.

And with tax money going to infrastructure, activities not limited to culture of one's country, and way more entertainment, as long as everyone is free, this will help ensuring one's dreams which can be central to one's emotional and menal health. If a country can't meet a person's need, travel will be required by the law to ensure the person feels free.

With world wide freedom, there will also be universal health for all because freedom means that people should be able to afford healthcare, but that healthcare will be defined by the person because otherwise it's not freedom but control. Psychwards has to shut down too, and the altruism of mankind make sure the person is well by listening to them and understanding them. Because psychwards controls people and sometimes force medication or other procedures, which goes against freedom.

It will be endless bliss and paradise. It is the true age of aquarius that I think this world needs. My reasoning is that freedom leads to, happy emotions, feeling free from a lot of fear, or from feeling scared, trapped, and reduces a lot of suffering.

And it also means that people will no longer feel lonely because I think that somehow there will always be people compassionte enough to understand other's suffering and therefore have compassion enough to understand their emotional needs and make sure it is met.

The idea of that as impossible may possibly be wrong, and it's better to remove the "im" from impossible, and realize that it's possible. And judgement about people's emotional needs as toxic or selfish is a bad thing in my opinion, and a view that becomes more prominent by all the division online that is created.

A love revolution with peace and where everyone is the main character, but in unity with one another, that's truly the golden age of aquarius. And the government will be every single human, and the altruistic task forcethat is mankind, is what ensure all humans feels free, which is upholding the one law that is freedom. No individuals will be controlled or in control over others.

Altruism doesn't replace freedom. In this case it means people understand the responsibility of making sure all of us are free and no one suffers, and simultaneously larger task forces are in place that also ensure it. The human collective itself is also the task force, but to make sure it works special task forces that people volunteer too, based on altruism, is also in place. And individuals in those special task forces is shifting constantly, so it's not to lose freedom, but just having the compassion to understand what may be required to ensure it.

Everyone will be equal, but that equality means realizing the individual itself, because the individual matters. All 8 billion people matters. All should be free. The entire world will change very quickly once this takes place. This is my opinion about freedom and it will end all control over others and will also require everyone to feel free. No more unfairness, or people living in unfair circumstances. And no greed either, cuz that doesn't make sense when everyone can live in abundance and where abundance is endless.

A lot of videos on social media feels completely pointless in my opinion and is just rehearsal. Whether it's fake tarot videos that tricked me in the past with continuous rehearsal of same content by fake readers trying to make content for money and fame. It's the same content repeated over and over. I believe some tarot readers have good intention but their channels often have very few subscribers. Feel as if the rest sold out to the illuminati literally speaking, and same with other influencers.

If these tarot readers actually believe their own stuff then I honestly believe they suffer delusions. It's basically "OMG who are you", "you got two people fighting over you", "people hate you because of this..", "your stolen inheritage will returned", "if you see this your angel wants you to know", "God got your back".. "I'm so happy with you, "you basically brought me to tears".. like dude do you even know me? why did I bring you to tears? I have not seen you before! Well, it's the algorithm, it's Google, not spiritual information.

The point is, these readers know it's nonsense and they play tricks with gullible naive people like myself. I am gonna get anxiety for writing this cuz these videos have disempowered me, and I end up keep returning even though I now just watch it for the entertainment label given to it, THAT NEVER MADE THIS MUCH SENSE BEFORE!!

And then we have the gender wars, "men are tired of their nonsense", "women now blame feminists", "men are fed up with dating", etc. And then there's the race wars, with blacks and whites, or jews and whites, or blacks and jews, or any other combination thereof. It feels like endless nonsense, mindless consumption. And while some of y'all may get dopamine from this, I feel like shit from all this nonsense cuz it does nothing to me. It's bullshit, that's what it is. And divisive distractions, just like the powers that should NOT be, would want people to spend their tme.

I feel so incredibly self conscious from this disorder and it makes me feel so embarrassed at times, overanalyzing every little thing I do. And feeling incredibly embarrassed over everything. I just hate how much worse OCD gets by living in the modern world because reality feels scary like a black mirror episode so my OCD is so much worse because of it when I feel that embarrassment is right out in the open and the thoughts therefore won't quit, and the paranoia won't stop. Because the way I behave at times is so embarrassing because I am forced to be so incredibly self conscious because my thoughts constantly remind me of every thing I do. It's also why I have sensorimotor obsessions. Overanalyzing how I blink and what it means to someone on the other side of the screen that I have no proof is seeing me, or overanalyzing my swallowing and how that will be interpreted.

Tired of holding things back on social media, with people around me, and me doing this myself out of both uncertainty about regret and because I'm trying to create a chronological structure on social media and in real life where things I write or say follows a certain order just for it to feel good on the inside. Really bothered to be so troubled and trying to create in that way. Because even on this subreddit or elsewhere, I may hold things back so that I can create a fantasy around that, like imagining people following all my posts and comments and then feeling the dopamine kick of slowly revealing about myself.

It has given me intense fears, like really intense fear, of being a narcissist. I am incredibly worried and terrified of this because of it. Or what possibly make me create a fantasy like that? From an OCD point of view, this directly leads my mind to narcissism. However if I was a narcissist I wouldn't have empathy or care, or believe everyone is equal and no one above or below. I don't think I'm superior, I don't see myself as better, I'm brutally honest about my flaws, and I prefer authenticity and don't want to be fake.

I actually take pride in my sensitivity, although that's because I think this is a strength cuz I think the world needs more love. And even though people see it as weakness, weakness is really my strength. However, I seriously feel crippled with worry over anxiety about being a narcissist. I hope posting about this, can help me break that delusional fantasy I am engaging with on social media regarding comments and posts.

However, most likely this pattern will continue. However, this is not about "me". And I've been gaslighted and told the world does not revolve around me and also been told that it's just not "me, me, me" so this has given me a lot of anxiety and self consciousness worrying that people may think I am a narcissist and being on edge a lot about it. And also feel like I doubt my own emotions after being told it's not all about me. I know that already, but it has led to a lot of self gaslighting about how I feel in general and makes me doubt my own emotions if they are right vs. wrong to have. And when I look at some of the things I do, I worry of being a narcissist.

Because if I have need of attention, validation, fantasizing about being followed on social media by other people and that they're invested in what I write, and also have a lot of worries about being perceived in a way I don't like, that to me sounds like narcissism. However I know it's my OCD speaking. I don't want to be perceived in a way that doesn't feel true to how I actually feel, so that's the difference. I want to be as authentic as I can be. But this makes me worried to be perceived in a way that is not authentic to how I am as my true self.

And I feel I somehow feel proud about my authentic self and being real and that I feel happy over positive things about me. And that is enough to further trigger a lot of narcissism OCD. I also equate confidence to having a massive ego. And because I'm a male it makes me feel as if being confident is worse cuz then I feel even more like a narcissist because I look at the stereotype of males that use confidence as a mask to hide their insecurities. I am brutally honest about my insecurities. I want to be as real as possible. But the worry is strong.

If all games goes digital, and everything becomes a subscription service, then I want to be able to subscribe to my dreams. I live in a country I don't really feel aligned with, nor its culture. If the world becomes all about subscription, then subscribing to certain experiences related to other cultures is something I want to do, and any other experience or dream that is authentic to me. I don't want to feel like a digital slave.

Because of my neurodivergence which causes some struggles with practical stuff where traveling to certain places feels difficult because of all the things I have to take into account and navigate on a practical level, which feels confusing to my mind, I therefore want my authenticity to be a subscription service. Otherwise subscription feels pointless.

I'm ready to subscribe if necessary to play GTA 6, however I'm a bit unsure if I would be willing to actually do that unless I live authentically first, because I worry that I could become too unstable if I see certain content in the game that could trigger jealousy. Things has been an emotional rollercoaster in my life and it could be devastating to see certain things in the game for that reason.

If I subscribed to certain experiences, then that becomes a lifestyle that I keep subscribing too. This means I'm subscribing to a license which should include a way to be able to easily have the experiences I want. The license agreement could offer the solution how. Just like license agreement exists with digital things. If that means I have to subscribe to additional things like taxi cab companies, airlines, and to companion guides, to be able to subscribe to my dreams, then so be it.

If everything is a subscription, then I want to subscribe to my authenticity that is in alignment to my actual soul. And metaverse is dangerous in my opinion so uploading my consciousness to a computer to live in metaverse is a threat, and can't replace real life. For me my issues with technology is mostly with microchips, wearable gadgets, anything with technology being too close.

Everyone is different, want different things. However, one thing to me is clear: if this is a collective timeline to be shared by all, and we're supposed to subscribe to things, then subscribing to meaning itself and what that means for me, would be amazing. In fact, this would actually makes me think subscription services are great. Because I feel misplaced in the world, and out of alignment with my dreams and my handicaps makes it more difficult to just leave this place. So if subscription services can help to turn my dreams into reality and be a lifestyle, then I don't see the problem in it.

Everything from everyday obsessions that involves itself with my day to day activities, to having my OCD become intertwined with dopamine seeking while getting drained in the process, is honestly everyday life. Some perfectionism is driven by anxiety and some is driven by a need to cope.

I have worries sometimes about my posts or comments being deleted and then feel a compulsion to look if the posts or comments are gone. This can happen on Reddit, on Youtube, in text documents or anywhere. It's very possible that posts or comments are missing, but I don't want to go back to ensure that nothing is lost.

It also bothers me when I have to complete thoughts in my head until I find a certain answer, or feel the need to work too hard with engaging online, only to find myself worrying about losing content after putting down lots of effort from the hyperfocused intent. However, the hyperfocus can also become obsessive to an unhealthy degree, where it causes anxiety if I let go in my head.

So there's compulsions everywhere, like "I gotta look so nothing is missing in what I wrote", "I have to focus on a certain area of research more than another area even if I don't want to", "I have to make sure to check the spelling, compulsively look up responses I already looked up cuz thoughts tells me that I may have forgot to click on the response".

Like there's all these obsessions that are so normal to me that I don't think about it so much as OCD because some of my OCD is so much worse. it still bothers me and I don't like it, but some of my OCD is even worse. However, these obsessions are still draining and it brings me out of the moment, so mindfulness becomes difficult to practice.

I know there's a portion of my OCD that is highly intertwined with addictive tendencies, because of emptiness from trauma. So there's all these attempts to deal with it, but sometimes these coping attempts are so subtle that I don't pay attention to them. And some of these compulsions are highly related to worries and anxiety itself that my OCD wants to control. So it becomes a weird mix between addiction and anxiety in some cases.

However, things used to be even more complex. it's still complex but I've managed to let go of some really complex behaviors used to cope with emptiness. For me a lot of coping behaviors has been through using my own OCD. However, that evolves my OCD by making it worse, where it goes from only anxiety driven OCD to using actual compulsions to cope with pain. So OCD then turns into a behavioral addiction where I'm engaging in obsessive compulsions driven by a need to fill an inner void.

It also used to involve abstract and complex rituals as well, but a lot of behavioral addiction I've managed to let go off. The compulsive behaviors are incredibly draining. However, I didn't realise I still have so many behavioral issues. I probably have a lot of subconscious behaviors playing out everyday that I'm not paying attention to as being a coping mechanism because I assumed I've overcome my strange addictions. Maybe I'm more empty than I realize.

I just know it's easier cuz I was going through withdrawal from letting go of some really bad coping behaviors in the past. However the way my OCD seems to involve itself with every aspect of my life, even addiction, despite the fact that I feel drained and hate these OCD patterns, really shows the nature of OCD even in addiction - it's incredibly ego-dystonic even as an addiction for me, going against what I stand for or would like it to be.

We all know about OCD related to worries and a need to act to avoid intense anxiety, but what about when OCD becomes connected to addiction? My OCD is everywhere for some reason. Very strange disorder in my opinion, to take up so much space and get itself involved with other mental health problems that I have that is already difficult in their own ways.

Have you ever experienced OCD turning into something else? like a different brand of compulsions used as emotional crutches for pain, that exists alongside compulsions related to OCD itself?

Advaita Vedanta and buddhist views on consciousness, works very well with quantum physics and neuroscience, and I also think understanding consciousness can offer a deeper perspective on the nature of love, and why separation, division and hatred creates a darker world, while love will create a better world. And also how history proves this itself based on all the hatred and division. I know we're also in Kali Yuga cycle, however I think we can work on improving the outcome of things by the way we engage with the world.

Some judgement is based on fair assessment in my opinion. Judgement can help create fairness. I believe if the judgement is based on creating fairness then it can be a good thing. There's also condemnation. Condemnation to state one's position as being against what someone does, can be a way to make sure others knows that they disagree with a certain act or behavior. It can also be a way to try and create justice by standing up for what is wrong. However, condemnation can also be perceived as something that is negative and toxic. And this is the type of judgement that I think has no real love behind it.

When judgement in the form of condemnation stems from hatred, then it's more about outlet of emotions alone, but very little about actually making the world any better. Sometimes it could be for other reasons someone hate, like projection from personal pain, or basically through being influenced by other people and their world views.

My argument for positive judgement vs negative judgement stems on the way it affects those involved, the collective, as well as the way it is a hatred towards an aspect of your own creation as consciousness itself, in which case I want to argue for the Advaita Vedanta perspective.

A) Positive judgement: It helps to 1. encourage positive change. 2. creates a positive ripple through the impact it has on the collective and those involved. 3. can create long term positive benefits for those involved. 4. Long term positive benefits from fair assessment of a situation, brings the world closer to peace and unity and shows that division isn't a good solution.

B) Negative judgement: 1. It is more about hatred but less about actual change. Positive judgement is more about justified anger but less about pure hatred which is toxic because of the negative ripple it has on the collective. 2. It doesn't bring change in the collective in a positive way, but leads to more division and hatred that spreads. 3. The encouragement of more hatred, leads to even more division, bringing peace and unity further away.

Now the Advaita Vedanta aspect: If there is no "you" or "I", but just consciousness, then what are you? You are consciousness, but not "you" in an egoic sense. So it's not "you" in a semantic sense that the mind can comprehend with thought, because thought is an illusion. Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta is inherently the same view about consciousness, but there is a focus on the semantic aspects which causes some disagreement among these groups. However the way consciousness is "you" is not in a way for your mind to understand. So you may as well just say "consciousness just is".. like the buddhists does. The semantics is confusing here, because we are dealing with levels beyond the mind. Thoughts would be part of the dream that consciousness is experiencing.

Here's my position on why from an Avaita Vedanta/buddhist perspective, negative judgement is bad for the collective.

1. There is consciousness. If "we" are consciousness itself, and this world isn't real which is supported by quantum physics and neuroscience, then thoughts are part of the illusion. Thoughts are fleeting in nature and yet we grasp on to them and believe them. They are even more fleeting than the illusory world we think we're seeing outside ourselves. In reality, there is nothing out there, because you're seeing the world because of what science can measure as physical light that bounces off of objects in the form of various wavelengths. Turn off the lamps in a room and you don't see the objects, and make it dim and you can see the objects but not the colors.

This physical light is decoded in the brain as neural light and you're only seeing a small fraction of the visible light spectrum itself. And the objects that your brain perceives is just an illusion that the brain think is there. The objects are not actually there, because you don't even see the real light if you turn on the lamps in a room, but the neural light. So the objects that seems to be there is created by the visual cortex based on the neural light that it receives through the retina and then interpreted by the visual cortex. It's like we're wearing VR glasses that we have forgotten about wearing.

Quantum physics supports neuroscience, and philosophically, Advaita Vedanta and buddhism offer a way to explain consciousness, which when taken quantum physics and neuroscience into consideration, becomes a very good model for why this world seems to be here to begin with. The holonomic brain theory may be how this illusory world is processed, like encoded memories or perception of reality, which is reduced in access, because of the limited access we have to visible light spectrum. Almost as if someone is controlling the holonomic brain, directing what our brains are allowed to see or not through frequency control.

Besides that, your very body itself is an illusion based on perception, and you only see the brain if its removed and then it's a perception as well as you won't really see the true nature of it, nor your own eyes which you only see if you look in the mirror or if you see other people that is part of the projection. And so what eyes are seeing, if the perception of seeing your own eyes in the mirror or that of other people is part of the illusion?

When you dream you're living in a subjective world of your own imagination, but your eyes are closed, it's dark, and you experience a complex landscape. So who is seeing when awake? Are you even awake when your perception is an illusion? You could dream of seeing your eyes as well, and you wouldn't say that's real when awake. How do you separate dream from the real world?

This goes deep into the very nature of consciousness. The atman (self) being the brahman (world soul or consciousness), and you're an actor. Everyone else that you see as a projection of consciousness is also actors. Consciousness perceiving itself as separate actors through a state of dissociation, but still just consciousness.

So from a moral standpoint I argue here that: Love is better than all judgement. And while some judgement can be beneficial depending on definition of judgement, I argue that the common way people judge others are in a divisive way which we see in the real world or on social media, and that even the elites of this world, shouldn't be judged in a way that is of hate. If we're gonna judge the powers that be, then there's a better way than doing it in a hateful way. And my position is that love will always be the best option, where we look beyond the division and remind ourselves that we're all the same consciousness playing as different actors.

So my position is that 1. If you bash on the elites and spread hatred towards them, then you're choosing to use your role as actor in the illusory dream world "maya", to hate other actors, and therefore you forget you're dreaming it all. Meanwhile you're wasting emotions as well. 2. My position is that constructive criticism, judgement in a way that is just and fair, not based on hatred, is what can bring about change. Likewise my position is that, just like constructive criticism can bring in change, so can love.

3. The reason constructive criticism can create change is through the encouragement of positive change, and empowering people to find their own voice to use in a way that benefits the world and doesn't divide. And here love comes in: because love brings unity, not division. Love brings healing, not hatred. And through division and hatred we keep encouraging this dream that we're in by engaging in it. Since everyone is an actor, the elites are not different from us, because there is no "us" to begin with. So seeing the unity in things, allows for transformation to happen in the world.

Further more, I argue my position by stating that throughout human history we have been divided and held hatred of one another or of another group that is different from us. And this hatred and division has led to war and conflicts all over the world. Therefore I argue that the real world demonstrates my position, that love is better than judgement which is often out of hatred, and that the real world shows through evidence itself, that hatred leads to a darker world whereas love is the cure for real change in the world.

I'm a westerner by the way, but I'm interested in the nature of consciousness based on Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism. I would never call myself an expert however, so I don't know that much because of my background as a westerner. So I may get a lot of things wrong about how I explain consciousness here.

Some judgement is based on fair assessment in my opinion. Judgement can help create fairness. I believe if the judgement is based on creating fairness then it can be a good thing. There's also condemnation. Condemnation to state one's position as being against what someone does, can be a way to make sure others knows that they disagree with a certain act or behavior. It can also be a way to try and create justice by standing up for what is wrong. However, condemnation can also be perceived as something that is negative and toxic. And this is the type of judgement that I think has no real love behind it.

When judgement in the form of condemnation stems from hatred, then it's more about outlet of emotions alone, but very little about actually making the world any better. Sometimes it could be for other reasons someone hate, like projection from personal pain, or basically through being influenced by other people and their world views.

My argument for positive judgement vs negative judgement stems on the way it affects those involved, the collective, as well as the way it is a hatred towards an aspect of your own creation as consciousness itself, in which case I want to argue for the Advaita Vedanta perspective.

A) Positive judgement: It helps to 1. encourage positive change. 2. creates a positive ripple through the impact it has on the collective and those involved. 3. can create long term positive benefits for those involved. 4. Long term positive benefits from fair assessment of a situation, brings the world closer to peace and unity and shows that division isn't a good solution.

B) Negative judgement: 1. It is more about hatred but less about actual change. Positive judgement is more about justified anger but less about pure hatred which is toxic because of the negative ripple it has on the collective. 2. It doesn't bring change in the collective in a positive way, but leads to more division and hatred that spreads. 3. The encouragement of more hatred, leads to even more division, bringing peace and unity further away.

Now the Advaita Vedanta aspect: If there is no "you" or "I", but just consciousness, then what are you? You are consciousness, but not "you" in an egoic sense. So it's not "you" in a semantic sense that the mind can comprehend with thought, because thought is an illusion. Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta is inherently the same view about consciousness, but there is a focus on the semantic aspects which causes some disagreement among these groups. However the way consciousness is "you" is not in a way for your mind to understand. So you may as well just say "consciousness just is".. like the buddhists does. The semantics is confusing here, because we are dealing with levels beyond the mind. Thoughts would be part of the dream that consciousness is experiencing.

Here's my position on why from an Avaita Vedanta/buddhist perspective, negative judgement is bad for the collective.

1. There is consciousness. If "we" are consciousness itself, and this world isn't real which is supported by quantum physics and neuroscience, then thoughts are part of the illusion. Thoughts are fleeting in nature and yet we grasp on to them and believe them. They are even more fleeting than the illusory world we think we're seeing outside ourselves. In reality, there is nothing out there, because you're seeing the world because of what science can measure as physical light that bounces off of objects in the form of various wavelengths. Turn off the lamps in a room and you don't see the objects, and make it dim and you can see the objects but not the colors.

This physical light is decoded in the brain as neural light and you're only seeing a small fraction of the visible light spectrum itself. And the objects that your brain perceives is just an illusion that the brain think is there. The objects are not actually there, because you don't even see the real light if you turn on the lamps in a room, but the neural light. So the objects that seems to be there is created by the visual cortex based on the neural light that it receives through the retina and then interpreted by the visual cortex. It's like we're wearing VR glasses that we have forgotten about wearing.

Quantum physics supports neuroscience, and philosophically, Advaita Vedanta and buddhism offer a way to explain consciousness, which when taken quantum physics and neuroscience into consideration, becomes a very good model for why this world seems to be here to begin with. The holonomic brain theory may be how this illusory world is processed, like encoded memories or perception of reality, which is reduced in access, because of the limited access we have to visible light spectrum. Almost as if someone is controlling the holonomic brain, directing what our brains are allowed to see or not through frequency control.

Besides that, your very body itself is an illusion based on perception, and you only see the brain if its removed and then it's a perception as well as you won't really see the true nature of it, nor your own eyes which you only see if you look in the mirror or if you see other people that is part of the projection. And so what eyes are seeing, if the perception of seeing your own eyes in the mirror or that of other people is part of the illusion?

When you dream you're living in a subjective world of your own imagination, but your eyes are closed, it's dark, and you experience a complex landscape. So who is seeing when awake? Are you even awake when your perception is an illusion? You could dream of seeing your eyes as well, and you wouldn't say that's real when awake. How do you separate dream from the real world?

This goes deep into the very nature of consciousness. The atman (self) being the brahman (world soul or consciousness), and you're an actor. Everyone else that you see as a projection of consciousness is also actors. Consciousness perceiving itself as separate actors through a state of dissociation, but still just consciousness.

So from a moral standpoint I argue here that: Love is better than all judgement. And while some judgement can be beneficial depending on definition of judgement, I argue that the common way people judge others are in a divisive way which we see in the real world or on social media, and that even the elites of this world, shouldn't be judged in a way that is of hate. If we're gonna judge the powers that be, then there's a better way than doing it in a hateful way. And my position is that love will always be the best option, where we look beyond the division and remind ourselves that we're all the same consciousness playing as different actors.

So my position is that 1. If you bash on the elites and spread hatred towards them, then you're choosing to use your role as actor in the illusory dream world "maya", to hate other actors, and therefore you forget you're dreaming it all. Meanwhile you're wasting emotions as well. 2. My position is that constructive criticism, judgement in a way that is just and fair, not based on hatred, is what can bring about change. Likewise my position is that, just like constructive criticism can bring in change, so can love.

3. The reason constructive criticism can create change is through the encouragement of positive change, and empowering people to find their own voice to use in a way that benefits the world and doesn't divide. And here love comes in: because love brings unity, not division. Love brings healing, not hatred. And through division and hatred we keep encouraging this dream that we're in by engaging in it. Since everyone is an actor, the elites are not different from us, because there is no "us" to begin with. So seeing the unity in things, allows for transformation to happen in the world.

Further more, I argue my position by stating that throughout human history we have been divided and held hatred of one another or of another group that is different from us. And this hatred and division has led to war and conflicts all over the world. Therefore I argue that the real world demonstrates my position, that love is better than judgement which is often out of hatred, and that the real world shows through evidence itself, that hatred leads to a darker world whereas love is the cure for real change in the world.

Okay first of all, I'm from Sweden, born here to swedish parents, but feel completely abandoned in my city. Because of the abandonment and emotional neglect from people around me, I have developed very extreme views that I think is legitimate reason to deport me. As a peaceful person I only want others well, but I fantasize about peaceful manifestations here that forces the leaders to address the problems here, like loneliness and isolation. And I also fantasize about a swedish revolution overthrowing the swedish parliament itself through peaceful infiltration of the parliament if they don't listen.

I've had unfortunate experiences with people in various places, and I may be a bit immature to blame this on those higher up in society, however my opinions about overthrowing the swedish parliament cuz of feeling emotional neglect, abandonment and denied to live a lifestyle that my soul craves, should make me an inappropriate member of this country.

The swedish parliament are all puppets to the bilderberg group, trilateral commission, world economic forum, the politicians in Brussel, and the Wallenbergs family. As someone with neurodivergence that feels mistreated in this country, rejected and abandoned, and only wants physical and emotionally intimate environments, I feel very hurt from the bullying. I need women in life and I've become very bitter at my country. If Swedish Democrats win I hope that's enough for them to deport me despite my origin, cuz I'm not appropriate to be here when I hate my own culture and everything this country stands for.

I refuse to adapt to a country that has damaged my soul this deeply. It feels like hell on earth. And I ask politely to not throw mean words at me like "incel" cuz that's just a very ridiculous response to someone that has been traumatized by its surrounding and left out in the cold. I ask everyday why I'm even here? I believe the only appropriate thing is for the swedish migration agency to deport me.

I'm just not a person they would want in this country to be honest. I should be in an appropriate environment that allows me to thrive and live authentically, not be in an environment that makes me feel unbalanced and emotionally unstable. I literally want to beg the swedish migration agency to just take me out of this place. If Swedish democrats win, then I want to be deported. I'm not an individual that should be here cuz of my extreme viewpoints and anti-swedish sentiments.

It can get really complicated. I use the word "Complex OCD" to describe my OCD cuz it's so complicated.

It's like an endless chain reaction recycling itself like ouroboros, from a single trigger. A frame of reference that feels personal, to fear of being misunderstood which causes huge anxiety.

And right now I was feeling like I'm paralyzed in decision making cuz the anxiety from the intrusive thoughts right now is making me unable to make a decision or any choice at all, cuz regardless of decision and or what choice to make, it will lead to paranoia and fear. Even trying to explain myself creates fear. Paralyzed in decision making, and turning to self censorship to reduce possible fear, also feeling compulsion to share about current experience due to perfectionism, which is stopped by the fear of making a decision cuz of the fear involved with whatever decision I'm making in regards to currrent fear.

So it leads to perfectionism and competition with myself, and many different fears from intrusive thoughts from frame of reference and fear of being misunderstood, hence judged. Right now I'm quite paranoid. Then the perfectionism in me feels torn between how much to share and how much to keep to myself, not only due to fear but also because of competition with myself in regards to how much to post.

Together it becomes a mix through the way compulsions and perfectionism, interacts with fear, paranoia and frame of reference, fear of being misunderstood and judged, and paralyzed from making any choice due to fear, that leads to anxiety running rampant, and overthinking choices to make sure it feels good afterwards. 😞

I have to make a choice. It's like OCD in a hegelian dialectic playout in my mind, where it's a battle between perfectionism and compulsion vs. fear and keeping quiet; It's just too difficult and complex to even explain here. It's so much more. It's like I have to try to navigate this dichotomy in my head by trying to find a balance in what I say or what not. My OCD is just extremely complicated.

And one simple trigger to set of this chain reaction inside. It doesn't make it easier when I have to deal with a lot of mental tics that I can't get rid of which repeats to try and remind myself of the trigger. I'm so sensitive. It's almost always a chain reaction. One thing leads to the next, so a whole set of worries triggering each other from an initial trigger. It's so fragile my OCD.

And with triggers leading to intrusive thoughts, suspicions kicks in from anxiety. I try to ignore the obsessing on these thoughts cuz it makes it worse and creates so many more issues for me. It's difficult to not feel defensive, and I rather be deluded than these anxieties be proven correct.

And sometimes a chain reaction will be completely different but just as extreme. A mental tic that acts like verbal tourettes but in the mind, leading to compulsions like explaining myself verbally to the invisible for fear of consequence otherwise due to magical thinking that it's necessary so that the universe itself knows the thought isn't on purpose. And that in itself can lead to all sorts of other problems, like self censoring during explanation, overthinking what I'm saying when explaining myself, and then mental breakdown as a result.

There's endless different scenarios. 😑

I had Sertraline and Risperidone in the past for OCD. I tried CBT one time when I was a teenager but I only went a few sessions and it was only for a particular issue with contamination OCD with thinking there's saliva from others in the food.

OCD really is a chronic thing. And it's also a source for a lot of anxiety and also has brought a great deal of anxiety attacks in my life. Many people think that only anxiety disorders gives anxiety, but the reason OCD isn't an anxiety disorder has to do with the behaviors involved, which is why it's a behavioral disorder. It is also related to other pathways in the brain like the cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuit.

I'm not sure how much I can share and what not, so I think I'll stop here. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg in my case. My OCD became more complex throughout life, progressing in severity with obsessions and compulsions. I think most people wirthout OCD will never be able to relate to us, except people like therapists, doctors or psychologists trained to have compassion. It's too difficult to comprehend to most people. Some think it's just a choice, that we can choose to not engage, but it isn't a choice and that's one thing that I think many will struggle to relate to that doesn't suffer from this disorder that truly could be described as hellish in nature.

I think political ideologies are in a sense egotistic in nature. I believe that wanting a political party to make decisions on the human collective of your own country is inherently a selfish thing, and a desire to impose your own values onto others and force them to obey. People with different political opinions do not agree with you. People don't want to obey a party they don't align with.

Billions of people seem to have an inherent desire for people in its own country to conform to the politics they have, by voting for a specific party, hoping it will win, and then expect all citizens to conform to the values of that party. Philosophically, this sounds like a fascism cloaked as democracy no matter what political party it is.

Radical freedom goes beyond that. It may seem like anarchy, but laws still apply. There is one law: ensuring freedom. If the law goes to ensuring freedom, then crime will decrease because if the law make sure people's freedom is taken into account, then the law will replace current laws that tries to keep people in check. With freedom, it's impossible for crime not to be reduced, cuz the law will ensure people feel free and have their rights.

So the only "freedom" restricted, is if you think your freedom means taking advantage of others. This radical freedom, will also end poverty and war. The law makes sure people live the lifestyle that they want or have the things they want in life. Freedom goes perfectly hand in hand with reduced crime rates.

Because freedom doesn't come at the cost of other people's freedom and happiness. It also means that the patriarchy will come to an end, because everyone will be equal regardless of gender. It also means religious freedom for everyone everywhere, and religious wars will end.

I think the tax money should go towards infrastructure. If the law demands that people are free to live how they want (of course not at the expense of other people's freedom), then the infrastructure must go towards ensuring this. Therefore I think the tax money should be spent on building the infrastructure needed for people to feel satisfied with life.

I believe radical freedom movements should start on a local level and that eventually, freedom will rule the world. I believe this marks the end of politics, and the golden age where everyone will TRULY be happy, not happy based on how other people wants us to live, but happy based on our own definition.

People have different goals, dreams and values. I always wish for people to live the lifestyle of their dreams and to reach all their goals. Peace on earth doesn't happen through imposing our values on other people. No one wants to conform to the party you vote for if they are not in alignment with that, and neither should they conform to be honest.

The bankers, the silicon valley technocrats, the governments, and all the powers that should NOT be.. created a miserable world to live in, in terms of entertainment. They want people entertained and distracted but they ruined the internet with AI overviews, LLM's, and social media. Social media was better in the early days when there was no algorithm. The algorithm makes social media suck and ruins the dopamine and make you bored and restless and miserable. Not only that, but social media is usually the only choice I'm left with, when I don't have a surrounding to hang out with anyway.

Society has octrasized me, so I'm left feeling like an outcast. People show their true colors in group circles, and the fake friends was exposed. And besides that, relationships in general has been miserable in the world outdoors, including getting rejected in love as well as seeing stupid satanic synchronicites created by the devil to hurt my emotions, such as men and women making out in front of my face.. like the simulation wants to slap me in my face and say "HAHAHA".

I have been shown the matrix, and how corrupt it is. Ain't no unseeing how corrupt and boring and restless this society and world is. So I'm left with a stupid 666 device in front of me, staring at a screen at algorithmic content being pushed, while my dopamine gets ruined and I fall into misery. Screw this satanic evil world. That's what I want to say.

And if I'm not even allowed to say that without the post getting removed by the filters.. then screw free speech I guess. Ain't no venting if venting is not permitted. I won't vent to people around me cuz there's no venting to people that won't understand you. Here is an outlet. I want to share how I feel about the world. I know I can't be alone feeling this way. I just want to get this out of my chest.

But my world won't collapse if the post is removed anyway, cuz I'm not the one that enjoys social media to begin with. I'm the one that ends up bored, restless and miserable from it and take out my megaphone and rant about illuminati and the bankers on the street.

The bankers, the silicon valley technocrats, the governments, and all the powers that should NOT be.. created a miserable world to live in, in terms of entertainment. They want people entertained and distracted but they ruined the internet with AI overviews, LLM's, and social media. Social media was better in the early days when there was no algorithm. The algorithm makes social media suck and ruins the dopamine and make you bored and restless and miserable. Not only that, but social media is usually the only choice I'm left with, when I don't have a surrounding to hang out with anyway.

Society has octrasized me, so I'm left feeling like an outcast. People show their true colors in group circles, and the fake friends was exposed. And besides that, relationships in general has been miserable in the world outdoors, including getting rejected in love as well as seeing stupid satanic synchronicites created by the devil to hurt my emotions, such as men and women making out in front of my face.. like the simulation wants to slap me in my face and say "HAHAHA".

I have been shown the matrix, and how corrupt it is. Ain't no unseeing how corrupt and boring and restless this society and world is. So I'm left with a stupid 666 device in front of me, staring at a screen at algorithmic content being pushed, while my dopamine gets ruined and I fall into misery. Screw this satanic evil world. That's what I want to say.

And if I'm not even allowed to say that without the post getting removed by the filters.. then screw free speech I guess. Ain't no venting if venting is not permitted. I won't vent to people around me cuz there's no venting to people that won't understand you. Here is an outlet. I want to share how I feel about the world. I know I can't be alone feeling this way. I just want to get this out of my chest.

But my world won't collapse if the post is removed anyway, cuz I'm not the one that enjoys social media to begin with. I'm the one that ends up bored, restless and miserable from it and take out my megaphone and rant about illuminati and the bankers on the street.