I’m a Secular Muslim who believes in Jewish Right to Return to the land of Ancient Israel and Judaea. I am also fully anti-Zionist. I’d like you to see what I see.
I find that Zionists seem to avoid talking about this perspective like the plague on reddit. I’m hoping here at least, there are those that understand what’d being said by the title alone.
But to explain a further, the first thing that makes the rest of the logic happen is the idea that states don’t naturally have the “right to exist” at the expense of the rights and freedoms of individuals. A Muslim state doesn’t have the right to impose Sharia law on those that don’t agree with the theocratic basis not rooted in empirical reality, a majority-white state doesn’t have the right to exclude or even deport people based on their brown or black skin color in order to enforce whiteness only because it’s whiteness, and in the same vein Israel does not have the right to remove people from their homes and kill innocents to preserve a quasi-ethnic Jewish majority and expansion since its founding. All of this should be Secularism 101, and yet? If you want to talk Arabs, then I would also say that the UAE and Saudi doesn’t have the right to make slaves out of Indians for 20 years and then deport their children who were born and raised there, or create second-class citizens out of non-Muslims including Jews. It is something that applies to all countries everywhere. The rights of the individual are the default. A state’s right to invoke the monopoly of violence is invoked only when individuals are in the process of violating other individuals, or if other states and groups are in the process of violating the state’s people.
Once you understand this, then you can also understand how secularists see any colonial or genocidal activity. Just as someone who has a crime done against him is owed recompense for the injustice upon him, so too are those affected by imperialism and genocide owed something. This means pretty explicitly that I believe Jews, as descendants of multiple ethnic cleansings and genocides in the ancient land of Israel, have a right to return as means of reparation or restitution for that exact crime. That would be fine if there weren’t now millions between 1918 and now affected by the whole land theft thing, or unjust exile (nakba, etc.), or being a non-citizen with no rights in a country that your family has lived longer in, or even being an innocent person in Gaza killed as “collateral damage” (they don’t believe an innocent Palestinian life is equal to an innocent Jewish life).
I’ve literally WANTED Zionism to mean “The Jewish Right to Return” due to them being genocided from that land, really badly, but it is Zionists themselves that insist in the whole “Jewish State” thing. Very bizarre. I want to know what it would take for Jews to see what I’m seeing in this logic. The vast supermajority of Jews are still zionists. It makes no sense.