How “trauma” is used to conceal abuse
I think we’ve all seen how therapists have raced to labeled themselves as “trauma-informed” over the past several years. Moreover, the IFS-informed model of the frightened inner child has become a popular framework for understanding the struggles of adulthood. There’s something nefarious going on here that isn’t unique to therapy.
For the past several decades, the “youth market” has become an extremely profitable and politically useful commodity across industries. The premiere archetype created by the music, film, and fashion industries has been the “rebel without a cause.” Young people, who feel misaligned with the systems they born into, who are at the highest risk of attempting suicide, are framed as, at best, misdirected.
This goes hand in hand with the perspective the mental health industry has adopted on trauma, particular youth trauma. Our disordered behaviors may not be “immoral,” as perhaps they once were deemed, however they remain inncorrect responses to one’s present state of being - they are trauma responses.
Trauma is retrospective. I rarely see it considered as ongoing - it always happened in the past. It doesn’t take sides. It’s not anyone’s fault. And it’s the responsibility of the victim to figure out how to live with it rather than prevent it.
Trauma sharply differs from abuse. Abuse would require a perpetrator. Abuse is an injustice that might require action. And if we identified similar patterns of abuse across an entire society, an aggressive or radical response might not be a dysfunctional behavioral at all.
While traumatized people are useful to our institutions as relatable, yet static, images of frustration and suffering, an explicitly abused and wronged population justifies the kind of radical action that industries like the mental healthcare system have never endorsed.